If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Just push the blue button!
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:07:20 GMT, Mike wrote:
So is everyone who flies VFR over the top or on a *moonless* night. Are all those pilots irrational as well? Perhaps, but if that's the case Kennedy was no more or less irrational than thousands of other pilots who put themselves into similar situations. That's my point. "Clearly he was a victim of spatial disorientation, which certainly can happen at night, but that particular night he had at least some *moonlight*." Your comment from a previous post, Mike. And I still stand by it. What's your point? If it's not obvious, no sense in discussing it. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Just push the blue button!
"Gezellig" wrote in message
... On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:05:13 GMT, Mike wrote: I never tell anyone if they should go or not. That's their own decision to make. 20% of fatal GA accidents are at night even though night flights make up only 5% of the GA traffic. Of those fatal accidents, the most common is exactly the situation that Kennedy found himself. So it wasn't as if Kennedy was in an easy situation and did something monumentally stupid. The chain of mistakes he made was at least a small monument to stupidity, imo. No more so than the dozens of people who manage to kill themselves the same way each year. To simply dismiss Kennedy as stupid and unskilled negates any educational value which can be derived from the accident. Personally I prefer to learn from the mistakes of others. To claim that stupidity is rampant doesn't dilute Kennedy's chain of stupid mistakes. I dismissed nothing, I made an opine which was clear. Is it not educational to learn when someone made a slew of stupid mistakes? It is when you start thinking you are immune to stupidity. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Just push the blue button!
"Gezellig" wrote in message
... On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:07:20 GMT, Mike wrote: So is everyone who flies VFR over the top or on a *moonless* night. Are all those pilots irrational as well? Perhaps, but if that's the case Kennedy was no more or less irrational than thousands of other pilots who put themselves into similar situations. That's my point. "Clearly he was a victim of spatial disorientation, which certainly can happen at night, but that particular night he had at least some *moonlight*." Your comment from a previous post, Mike. And I still stand by it. What's your point? If it's not obvious, no sense in discussing it. Your implication was that I wasn't being consistent, yet how you came to that conclusion is anyone's guess. For all I know English is not your first language and something was lost in translation. If you can't back up your assertion, then so be it. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Just push the blue button!
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:27:25 GMT, Mike wrote:
No more so than the dozens of people who manage to kill themselves the same way each year. To simply dismiss Kennedy as stupid and unskilled negates any educational value which can be derived from the accident. Personally I prefer to learn from the mistakes of others. To claim that stupidity is rampant doesn't dilute Kennedy's chain of stupid mistakes. I dismissed nothing, I made an opine which was clear. Is it not educational to learn when someone made a slew of stupid mistakes? It is when you start thinking you are immune to stupidity. Ok, you can argue in circles, I'll sit by and watch you feint. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Gezellig Hands Mike His Ass - In A Sack
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:30:26 GMT, Mike wrote:
"Gezellig" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:07:20 GMT, Mike wrote: So is everyone who flies VFR over the top or on a *moonless* night. Are all those pilots irrational as well? Perhaps, but if that's the case Kennedy was no more or less irrational than thousands of other pilots who put themselves into similar situations. That's my point. "Clearly he was a victim of spatial disorientation, which certainly can happen at night, but that particular night he had at least some *moonlight*." Your comment from a previous post, Mike. And I still stand by it. What's your point? If it's not obvious, no sense in discussing it. Your implication was that I wasn't being consistent, yet how you came to that conclusion is anyone's guess. For all I know English is not your first language and something was lost in translation. If you can't back up your assertion, then so be it. heh I apologize for having the temerity to suggest that your post was inaccurate or your use of English was, well, shall we say sub- optimal? I can see that no-one can tell you that you are wrong, but it might be a good idea to see a clinical psychologist to discuss your last suggestion and the emotions that gave rise to it. You could have simply said that you are unable to grasp the concept of comprehending context. Maybe if you if you read the entire post before leaping to your baseless conclusion you'll have better luck. If you insist on prompting your flawed perspective then I suggest that you go fornicate yourself with a broken bottle. HTH & HAND. You have no point - you are a blitherer who brings up irrelevancies. I dispose of them, not to convince a moron like you, but for the benefit of others not intractably stupid like you. You, a compulsive imbecile, have convincingly demonstrated that you will continue to bring up such inanities repeatedly, even after they have been utterly shot down, just as a dog will return to its vomit. A lumbering, listing, weaving and bobbing idiot like a drunk lurching and staggering slowly along the sidewalk from one lamppost to the next, post after post, as you plow along, burping and belching, through a swamp of sewage in order to drape your flabby self into a chair, reeking tired beer fumes with every exhalation. It takes a special kind of Usenet k00k-- a village drunkard of RAP -- to produce senseless posts like this, and you seem to have cornered the market. TO ALL: Come and meet Mike, all-round pig-headed oaf.*With cabbages*as his intellectual equals, he excels at spectacular*self-nukes, turning himself into piles of radioactive dust with every post. You've probably seen blind-drunk old men with two left feet and only one leg avoid fresh pools of warm vomit on the footpath with more skill and finesse than Mike has at avoiding the inevitable... yet another spectacular self-nuke. But wait, he will entertain you with a flurry of posts to the Ulti-Troll, Mxmaniac, who sucks in the least brained and most defenseless turning those, like Mike here, into Trick ****ing Ponies, asses bared, Mxed screwed like the box-o-rocks idiots they are. Off with you, Little Boy, I have a life and now that I have denigrated yours in front of all of your buddy-wuddies, I can only hope, slightly and not for more than a nanosecond, you don't stall, spin and crash in real flight as you have hear in this thread. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Just push the blue button!
"Gezellig" wrote in message
... On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:27:25 GMT, Mike wrote: No more so than the dozens of people who manage to kill themselves the same way each year. To simply dismiss Kennedy as stupid and unskilled negates any educational value which can be derived from the accident. Personally I prefer to learn from the mistakes of others. To claim that stupidity is rampant doesn't dilute Kennedy's chain of stupid mistakes. I dismissed nothing, I made an opine which was clear. Is it not educational to learn when someone made a slew of stupid mistakes? It is when you start thinking you are immune to stupidity. Ok, you can argue in circles, I'll sit by and watch you feint. Hmm, well I don't think that one came out exactly as you intended, but I doubt you have the literacy level to know why. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Gezellig Hands Mike His Ass - In A Sack
"Gezellig" wrote in message
... On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:30:26 GMT, Mike wrote: "Gezellig" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:07:20 GMT, Mike wrote: So is everyone who flies VFR over the top or on a *moonless* night. Are all those pilots irrational as well? Perhaps, but if that's the case Kennedy was no more or less irrational than thousands of other pilots who put themselves into similar situations. That's my point. "Clearly he was a victim of spatial disorientation, which certainly can happen at night, but that particular night he had at least some *moonlight*." Your comment from a previous post, Mike. And I still stand by it. What's your point? If it's not obvious, no sense in discussing it. Your implication was that I wasn't being consistent, yet how you came to that conclusion is anyone's guess. For all I know English is not your first language and something was lost in translation. If you can't back up your assertion, then so be it. heh I apologize for having the temerity to suggest that your post was inaccurate or your use of English was, well, shall we say sub- optimal? I can see that no-one can tell you that you are wrong, but it might be a good idea to see a clinical psychologist to discuss your last suggestion and the emotions that gave rise to it. You posted the following, and you have the nerve to make such implications? Try looking in the mirror sometime, sonny. You might be surprised what you'll find. You could have simply said that you are unable to grasp the concept of comprehending context. Maybe if you if you read the entire post before leaping to your baseless conclusion you'll have better luck. If you insist on prompting your flawed perspective then I suggest that you go fornicate yourself with a broken bottle. HTH & HAND. You have no point - you are a blitherer who brings up irrelevancies. I dispose of them, not to convince a moron like you, but for the benefit of others not intractably stupid like you. You, a compulsive imbecile, have convincingly demonstrated that you will continue to bring up such inanities repeatedly, even after they have been utterly shot down, just as a dog will return to its vomit. A lumbering, listing, weaving and bobbing idiot like a drunk lurching and staggering slowly along the sidewalk from one lamppost to the next, post after post, as you plow along, burping and belching, through a swamp of sewage in order to drape your flabby self into a chair, reeking tired beer fumes with every exhalation. It takes a special kind of Usenet k00k-- a village drunkard of RAP -- to produce senseless posts like this, and you seem to have cornered the market. TO ALL: Come and meet Mike, all-round pig-headed oaf. With cabbages as his intellectual equals, he excels at spectacular self-nukes, turning himself into piles of radioactive dust with every post. You've probably seen blind-drunk old men with two left feet and only one leg avoid fresh pools of warm vomit on the footpath with more skill and finesse than Mike has at avoiding the inevitable... yet another spectacular self-nuke. But wait, he will entertain you with a flurry of posts to the Ulti-Troll, Mxmaniac, who sucks in the least brained and most defenseless turning those, like Mike here, into Trick ****ing Ponies, asses bared, Mxed screwed like the box-o-rocks idiots they are. Off with you, Little Boy, I have a life and now that I have denigrated yours in front of all of your buddy-wuddies, I can only hope, slightly and not for more than a nanosecond, you don't stall, spin and crash in real flight as you have hear in this thread. Ah, how cute. Gezellig found an automated giberish generator and now he really thinks he's quite the wit. I must at least give him half credit in that regard. You're not, son. You're just another spew bag with nothing useful to offer (other than entertainment). In the end, the best you could do is try to make the case on how you are better and smarter than everyone else and no such thing would ever happen to you. If you want to think that, go ahead son. It's your funeral. Just don't get so bent out of shape next time when someone points out how full of $hit you are. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Gezellig Hands Mike His Ass - In A Sack
heh I apologize for having the temerity to suggest that your post was inaccurate or your use of English was, well, shall we say sub- optimal? I can see that no-one can tell you that you are wrong, but it might be a good idea to see a clinical psychologist to discuss your last suggestion and the emotions that gave rise to it. You could have simply said that you are unable to grasp the concept of comprehending context. Maybe if you if you read the entire post before leaping to your baseless conclusion you'll have better luck. If you insist on prompting your flawed perspective then I suggest that you go fornicate yourself with a broken bottle. HTH & HAND. You have no point - you are a blitherer who brings up irrelevancies. I dispose of them, not to convince a moron like you, but for the benefit of others not intractably stupid like you. You, a compulsive imbecile, have convincingly demonstrated that you will continue to bring up such inanities repeatedly, even after they have been utterly shot down, just as a dog will return to its vomit. A lumbering, listing, weaving and bobbing idiot like a drunk lurching and staggering slowly along the sidewalk from one lamppost to the next, post after post, as you plow along, burping and belching, through a swamp of sewage in order to drape your flabby self into a chair, reeking tired beer fumes with every exhalation. It takes a special kind of Usenet k00k-- a village drunkard of RAP -- to produce senseless posts like this, and you seem to have cornered the market. TO ALL: Come and meet Mike, all-round pig-headed oaf.*With cabbages*as his intellectual equals, he excels at spectacular*self-nukes, turning himself into piles of radioactive dust with every post. You've probably seen blind-drunk old men with two left feet and only one leg avoid fresh pools of warm vomit on the footpath with more skill and finesse than Mike has at avoiding the inevitable... yet another spectacular self-nuke. But wait, he will entertain you with a flurry of posts to the Ulti-Troll, Mxmaniac, who sucks in the least brained and most defenseless turning those, like Mike here, into Trick ****ing Ponies, asses bared, Mxed screwed like the box-o-rocks idiots they are. Off with you, Little Boy, I have a life and now that I have denigrated yours in front of all of your buddy-wuddies, I can only hope, slightly and not for more than a nanosecond, you don't stall, spin and crash in real flight as you have hear in this thread. Mike quickly vomited before hitting the killfile You *PLONK* |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Gezellig Hands Mike His Ass - In A Sack
"Gezellig" wrote in message
... heh I apologize for having the temerity to suggest that your post was inaccurate or your use of English was, well, shall we say sub- optimal? I can see that no-one can tell you that you are wrong, but it might be a good idea to see a clinical psychologist to discuss your last suggestion and the emotions that gave rise to it. You could have simply said that you are unable to grasp the concept of comprehending context. Maybe if you if you read the entire post before leaping to your baseless conclusion you'll have better luck. If you insist on prompting your flawed perspective then I suggest that you go fornicate yourself with a broken bottle. HTH & HAND. You have no point - you are a blitherer who brings up irrelevancies. I dispose of them, not to convince a moron like you, but for the benefit of others not intractably stupid like you. You, a compulsive imbecile, have convincingly demonstrated that you will continue to bring up such inanities repeatedly, even after they have been utterly shot down, just as a dog will return to its vomit. A lumbering, listing, weaving and bobbing idiot like a drunk lurching and staggering slowly along the sidewalk from one lamppost to the next, post after post, as you plow along, burping and belching, through a swamp of sewage in order to drape your flabby self into a chair, reeking tired beer fumes with every exhalation. It takes a special kind of Usenet k00k-- a village drunkard of RAP -- to produce senseless posts like this, and you seem to have cornered the market. TO ALL: Come and meet Mike, all-round pig-headed oaf. With cabbages as his intellectual equals, he excels at spectacular self-nukes, turning himself into piles of radioactive dust with every post. You've probably seen blind-drunk old men with two left feet and only one leg avoid fresh pools of warm vomit on the footpath with more skill and finesse than Mike has at avoiding the inevitable... yet another spectacular self-nuke. But wait, he will entertain you with a flurry of posts to the Ulti-Troll, Mxmaniac, who sucks in the least brained and most defenseless turning those, like Mike here, into Trick ****ing Ponies, asses bared, Mxed screwed like the box-o-rocks idiots they are. Off with you, Little Boy, I have a life and now that I have denigrated yours in front of all of your buddy-wuddies, I can only hope, slightly and not for more than a nanosecond, you don't stall, spin and crash in real flight as you have hear in this thread. Mike quickly vomited before hitting the killfile You *PLONK* Music to my ears. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Gezellig Hands Mike His Ass - In A Sack
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:47:14 GMT, Mike wrote:
"Gezellig" wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:30:26 GMT, Mike wrote: "Gezellig" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:07:20 GMT, Mike wrote: So is everyone who flies VFR over the top or on a *moonless* night. Are all those pilots irrational as well? Perhaps, but if that's the case Kennedy was no more or less irrational than thousands of other pilots who put themselves into similar situations. That's my point. "Clearly he was a victim of spatial disorientation, which certainly can happen at night, but that particular night he had at least some *moonlight*." Your comment from a previous post, Mike. And I still stand by it. What's your point? If it's not obvious, no sense in discussing it. Your implication was that I wasn't being consistent, yet how you came to that conclusion is anyone's guess. For all I know English is not your first language and something was lost in translation. If you can't back up your assertion, then so be it. heh I apologize for having the temerity to suggest that your post was inaccurate or your use of English was, well, shall we say sub- optimal? I can see that no-one can tell you that you are wrong, but it might be a good idea to see a clinical psychologist to discuss your last suggestion and the emotions that gave rise to it. You posted the following, Stay down, Dickhead, for Crissakes STAY DOWN!!!! -- Will in New Haven |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PUSH START | stanley adelson | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 15th 08 01:16 AM |
Looking for KFC225 autopilot red disconnect button | Rich Grise | General Aviation | 5 | May 23rd 05 06:48 PM |
Looking for KFC225 autopilot red disconnect button | Rich Grise | Owning | 4 | May 21st 05 05:02 PM |
'Mute' button for jets explored | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 1 | July 5th 04 07:42 PM |
more reasons for GA: John Gilmo I was ejected from a plane for wearing "Suspected Terrorist" button | Martin Hotze | Piloting | 80 | August 3rd 03 12:41 AM |