Wing De-Icing Question

In article ,
says...


On Feb 17, 3:23*am, VOR-DME wrote:
In article
,
says...



The NASA study on tail stall notwithstanding?

In this case I think Gezellig is right.
After the high-profile Roselawn (ATR) accident a few years ago, and the
Vickers
Viscount accidents dating back to 1954, we have had ample time to improve
our
icing awareness, particularly for the most vulnerable aircraft/mission
profiles, and if the truth be known we don't have much to show for it . . .

Umm...I was questioning Bertie....Gezellig's post was down thread.
Attribution, attribution.......

Sorry - I dont receive "Bertie" or "Mxsmanic" or any responses to these
self-styled, self-sufficient spammers. The filters I have developed leave me in
ignorant bliss with regard to these intellectually impoverished ignoramuses.
Don't know how your's got through. If you are involved in discussion with
same, frequency change is approved - go away.

In article ,
says...




I don't indulge with Bertie much either but in this thread I was
curious about what his reaction to a previous poster hence my question
to him. I didn't realize I needed your permission to do that . I
haven't seen your 'nym on here much in the past, and that's been
without benefit of filters.....just lucky, I guess.



OK I apologize.
I admit I'm a bit peeved about what some self-indulgent guys have done to
normal exchange and discourse here. . .

On Feb 17, 6:38*am, VOR-DME wrote:
In article ,
says...



I don't indulge with Bertie much either but in this thread I was
curious about what his reaction to a previous poster hence my question
to him. *I didn't realize I needed your permission to do that . *I
haven't seen your 'nym on here much in the past, and that's been
without benefit of filters.....just lucky, I guess.

OK I apologize.
Roger that........
..

On Feb 17, 12:43*am, Austin "The Geeker" Whitten ©¿©¬ aus...@geeks-
in-route.com wrote:


Yessir and that means you fukk up and post AssClown reponses to the
wrong peoples.

AssClown.
--
Austin Whitten, President; Geeks-In-Route, Inc;
3808 Gunn Hwy Ste C Tampa, FL 33618 866-661-GEEK Ext 701
813-480-0103 Mobile 813-388-4902 Faxwww.geeks-in-route.com

Such a sterling contribution..............not.

On Feb 17, 4:41*am, Dave Doe wrote:
In article 5ce52bc4-6f80-4f81-802a-dee4be16d346
@h20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com, says...



On Feb 16, 5:23*pm, Gezellig wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:42:52 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
I belong to a world-wide flight safety work group that uses the base
all the time. It can be useful as you say. Our work is primarily
involved with the low altitude aerobatic display environment but many
in our community are airline people and have a great interest in
anything that enhances the learning curve safety wise.
I was pleasantly surprised to discover that in our work group alone,
the interest in tailplane icing has increased since yesterday to the
point where information has been spreading throughout the low to
medium altitude turbo-prop scheduled and non- scheduled operations
world wide.
-DH

There's something radically wrong here. Of course the horz stabil can
ice, a tail can ice. Of course there should be a sh**load of info on it
but I'll be damned if I know where it is. POH? Cessna 15x or 17x?
Diamonds?

You're right. There should be much more written on the issue. NASA has
been working on it for quite a while now and in fact has done a film
piece on it for distribution throughout the aviation community.
Just in case you haven't seen the NASA piece, I've included a link on
it for you. It's worth watching!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...23060735779946

A very good video, I have emailed it to some Air New Zealand folk, and
hope they distribute it around.

--
Duncan

Flight safety works in many mysterious ways sometimes. An accident
always causes discussion and movement in the community. The
speculation of course is seldom useful and can actually be detrimental
in certain cases, but the exposure and subsequent distribution of
flight safety issues like tailplane icing that don't get much press
every day can be a VERY positive factor in increasing awareness of
these issues.
Spreading the word is always helpful.
-DH

VOR-DME wrote in
:

In article
,
says...




The NASA study on tail stall notwithstanding?


In this case I think Gezellig is right.

And, it appears, you were both wrong...


Bertie

VOR-DME wrote in
:

In article
,
says...


On Feb 17, 3:23*am, VOR-DME wrote:
In article
,
says...



The NASA study on tail stall notwithstanding?

In this case I think Gezellig is right.
After the high-profile Roselawn (ATR) accident a few years ago, and
the
Vickers
Viscount accidents dating back to 1954, we have had ample time to
improve
our
icing awareness, particularly for the most vulnerable
aircraft/mission profiles, and if the truth be known we don't have
much to show for it . . .

Umm...I was questioning Bertie....Gezellig's post was down thread.
Attribution, attribution.......

Sorry - I dont receive "Bertie" or "Mxsmanic" or any responses to
these self-styled, self-sufficient spammers. The filters I have
developed leave me in ignorant bliss


Ah, ignorant blss, how nice for you.


Bertie