![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#741
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 1, 3:04 am, Tina wrote:
On Jun 1, 5:37 am, Mxsmanic wrote: terry writes: I dont doubt you analysed it Anthony, but you still havent seen, or aren't willing to admit , that you had it all wrong. Now what has the SOURCE of the air pressure got to do with the discussion? A great deal. Without gravity, air pressure would be zero, and volume would be infinite. As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could have smaller wings on your airplane, right? Well, no. The gas 'laws' are approximations and fail to be predictive except within certain ranges, just as Newtonian physics are valid only in certain ranges.. Doing wing sectional sims, I used the centrifugal force of the displaced air over the wing surfaces. It is a fairly simple algorithm, in accord with physics, and works surprisingly well. It also stalls well, since Energy=Force x distance, and once the airstream kinetic energy is bled off, the airstream reverses and follows the wing to give turbulence. Good Stuff. Ken |
#742
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken S. Tucker writes:
As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could have smaller wings on your airplane, right? Without gravity, wings serve little purpose. |
#743
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 1, 12:07 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Ken S. Tucker writes: As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could have smaller wings on your airplane, right? Without gravity, wings serve little purpose. But you'd still need to steer, right? |
#744
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Carly Fiorina Please don't use foul language in this newsgroup. |
#745
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 3:07*am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
Doing wing sectional sims, I used the centrifugal force of the displaced air over the wing surfaces. It is a fairly simple algorithm, in accord with physics, and works surprisingly well. A fictional force for a fictional calcullation. Sounds about right. LOL Cheers |
#746
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
: On Jun 1, 3:04 am, Tina wrote: On Jun 1, 5:37 am, Mxsmanic wrote: terry writes: I dont doubt you analysed it Anthony, but you still havent seen, or aren't willing to admit , that you had it all wrong. Now what has the SOURCE of the air pressure got to do with the discussion? A great deal. Without gravity, air pressure would be zero, and volume would be infinite. As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could have smaller wings on your airplane, right? Well, no. The gas 'laws' are approximations and fail to be predictive except within certain ranges, just as Newtonian physics are valid only in certain ranges.. Doing wing sectional sims, I used the centrifugal force of the displaced air over the wing surfaces. It is a fairly simple algorithm, in accord with physics, and works surprisingly well. It also stalls well, since Energy=Force x distance, and once the airstream kinetic energy is bled off, the airstream reverses and follows the wing to give turbulence. Good Stuff. Good grief. Bertie |
#747
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:bafc87a0-1671-4ee5-
: On Jun 1, 12:07 pm, Mxsmanic wrote: Ken S. Tucker writes: As a student pilot, if you have no gravity, you could have smaller wings on your airplane, right? Without gravity, wings serve little purpose. But you'd still need to steer, right? Where have you got to go? Bertie |
#748
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:Fym%j.56$kR5.31 @newsfe24.lga: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . Matters not. it's all about keeping th ek00k on the boil, k00kie boi.... Bertie Lame and incorrect, D-. Nope. Your smileys stink. BTW. Don't quit your day job. I haven't. |
#749
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news ![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote in news:84d93dd6a5c60@uwe: terry wrote: LABotomy... Nice pick up Cloudy. I cant take any credit for that one, my spelling is terrable Terry in your case, Terryble. Go to your room. Bertie You wish., Dumb ass. |
#750
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:7zm%j.57$kR5.16 @newsfe24.lga: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . Nope. Oh, and BTW, everyone can see it but you. Therein lies the beauty... Bertie Lame and incorrect again, F. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DC-3 parts to give away | Robert Little | Restoration | 2 | November 23rd 06 03:30 AM |
Who can give a checkout? | Mark S Conway | General Aviation | 2 | May 9th 05 12:15 AM |
Winch give-away | KP | Soaring | 6 | January 11th 05 08:04 PM |
Did you ever give up on an IR? | No Such User | Piloting | 24 | November 26th 03 02:45 PM |
FS 2004 give away | Ozzie M | Simulators | 0 | November 23rd 03 03:50 PM |