A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airbus A 380 is rolling



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old April 23rd 05, 05:21 AM
Robert B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Galban" wrote in message
oups.com...

Jay Beckman wrote:


Thought I read somewhere that Emirates Air already wants to rasie the


capacity of the A380...round about 800 pax, IIRC.

Good grief! Now you'll have to get to the airport 4 hrs. early. Can
you imagine how long it would take to check in and board 800 people and
their luggage?

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)


Forget check-in and luggage... Can you imagine Custom lines if a couple of
these suckers land at the same time?


  #72  
Old April 23rd 05, 09:25 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Faky,

it is at the least very risky to be putting all
of your eggs in one basket with the A380.


It would be - if Airbus did. They don't. They have a line of aircraft
covering all needs, including a competitor to the 787, the 350. To
pretend that Boeing's line-up is anywhere near as complete ais Airbus's
would be, well, strange.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #73  
Old April 23rd 05, 09:25 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dean,

No subsidies, no A350


Boeing would be long dead without subsidies.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #74  
Old April 23rd 05, 09:25 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dean,

Bull****, Boeing doesn't receive government subsidies.


Bruhaha.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #75  
Old April 23rd 05, 09:25 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John,

Good grief! Now you'll have to get to the airport 4 hrs. early. Can
you imagine how long it would take to check in and board 800 people and
their luggage?


This is so funny. It reads like what one read in the trade magazines of
the late 60s about the 747. Exactly, almost word for word. Look at us
today: Does anyone think anything about boarding a 747 flight?

Ah, human nature and innovation...

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #76  
Old April 23rd 05, 09:25 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cub,

(which will probably never get off the ground).


How do you get these ideas? A friend of mine is busy designing the
vertical stabilizer as we speak. It will fly, since it will be the
succesor of the 330.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #77  
Old April 23rd 05, 11:18 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:25:16 +0200, Thomas Borchert
wrote:

Does anyone think anything about boarding a 747 flight?


Yes, I do.

Or rather, I don't, if I can help it.



-- all the best, Dan Ford

email (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum:
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
the blog: www.danford.net
In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com
  #78  
Old April 23rd 05, 01:43 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:


Boeing would be long dead without subsidies.


define "subsidies"

--
Bob Noel
looking for a sig the lawyers will like
  #79  
Old April 23rd 05, 01:45 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:

This is so funny. It reads like what one read in the trade magazines of
the late 60s about the 747. Exactly, almost word for word. Look at us
today: Does anyone think anything about boarding a 747 flight?


yes. One reason I like RJ's and turboprop aircraft is the short time required
to load and unload the aircraft.

--
Bob Noel
looking for a sig the lawyers will like
  #80  
Old April 23rd 05, 05:15 PM
Chris Colohan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thomas Borchert writes:
Good grief! Now you'll have to get to the airport 4 hrs. early. Can
you imagine how long it would take to check in and board 800 people and
their luggage?


This is so funny. It reads like what one read in the trade magazines of
the late 60s about the 747. Exactly, almost word for word. Look at us
today: Does anyone think anything about boarding a 747 flight?

Ah, human nature and innovation...


Yeah, you notice that these planes have more than one door -- it would
be _so_ nice if airports would design gates to use multiple doors at
the same time...

(I know, some airports in Europe do this. Just not here.)

Chris
--
Chris Colohan Email: PGP: finger
Web:
www.colohan.com Phone: (412)268-4751
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Information on A310 that lost it's rudder enroute to Canada from Cuba Corky Scott Piloting 3 March 27th 05 03:49 PM
Australia chooses Airbus tankers John Cook Military Aviation 0 April 16th 04 10:25 AM
Airbus 15 minutes of fame over? Buzzer Military Aviation 5 January 20th 04 04:42 AM
Airbus Charts Course for Military Contracts Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 24th 03 11:04 PM
Airbus Aiming at U.S. Military Market Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 21st 03 08:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.