![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would never have picked up on it, but the aviation magazines made a big
thing of it at the time. Bob Gardner "Robert Moore" wrote in message . 8... "Bob Gardner" wrote This reminds me of the time when LearJet got a jet certified for 51,000 feet...the photograph in the aviation press showed both pilots smiling into the camera at FL510 without an oxygen mask in sight. Always wondered how the FAA reacted to that. They probably had "quick donners" available, which modifies the reg. Bob Moore |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Aviation wrote: Do they put their oxygen masks on FIRST or start the dive first? Masks go on first. After the Payne Weber incident, there was some discussion about instituting a policy whereby at least one of the flight crew is wearing a mask at all times above a certain altitude. I don't know if that was emplemented. Crews would set the autopilot to perform the descent even if they lose consciousness. Someone also pointed out my goof about "holding" your breath upon going from cabin (8000 ft pressure) to ambient (25-35,000 ft pressure). In estimating how much time the average civilian passenger could go without TAKING a breath of good air (14,000 ft or below), I used the HOLD your breath estimate. Assuming there is 3-5 minutes of mask-oxygen and one minute of "holding" the last breath, they've got 3-6 minutes to get down to breathable (14,000 ft?) air and then below. Once again. You cannot hold the last breath for 1 minute. You can't hold it for five seconds. The air will rush out of your lungs as rapidly as it rushes out of the plane, and there isn't a single thing you can do about it. As soon as the pressure gets below about 10 psi, the oxygen will start to leave your bloodstream. You have perhaps 45 seconds before you turn into a babbling idiot - probably much less. If they don't get you down to a decent altitude in less than about 4 minutes, you may stay a babbling idiot for the rest of your life. A few more minutes, and you will probably die. For the movie Executive Decision, they were cruising at 39,000 ft. so they'd have to dive 25,000 ft to 14,000 ft in 5 minutes, 5,000 ft/minute, average. Doable? Mike Rappaport posted that his aircraft can descend at 10,000 fpm. He also posted the opinion that many jets can do better than that. I found some rate of ASCENT data of about 3850 ft/min at http://www.altairva-fs.com/fleet/poh...0747%20POH.htm but descent data isn't clear to me but it looks like 2500 ft/min from cruise altitude down to 10,000 ft is the recommended ROD. Recommended descent rate goes out the window in an emergency. Think on it a little. Most jet airliners top out between 400 and 500 mph. Idle the engines and point the nose down, you should be able to get a rate of descent in excess of 25,000 fpm. Hit 500 knots straight down, and you're talking 50,000 fpm, but the pullout would probably pull the wings off. The discussion of the ear problem seems unsettled. Upon going from 8000 ft cabin pressure to 25000+ ft pressure in a couple of seconds (if loss of pressure is total), some rapid swallowing should equilibrate your ears to low pressure. Descending from 25,000+ (39,000) ft at 5,000 ft/min could result in reversible or IRREVERSIBLE damage depending on a person's ability to equilibrate REALLY fast. If you have the presence of mind to do the exercises necessary to save your ears when the pressure drops, perhaps you'd have the presence of mind to hold your nose and blow into your ears on the way down? Even if you don't, it beats dying. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message hlink.net... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message m... Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude this is an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of ambient. When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading is above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure. This is incorrect, pressurization is the differential between ambient and cabin preasure. Mike MU-2 Please reconsider your statement above as it applies to pressurization of A/C cabins at altitude. At altitude A/C cabins are like a pressure vessel. A/C cabins are pressurized to maintain ~ 12 PSI Gauge, ~ the same as normal atmospheric pressure @ 11,000' ASL, in the cabin irrespective of altitude above 11,000' ASL. Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type A/C pressure systems are set to operate from departure point. If set manually from info provided by ATC this is "Unadjusted Barometric Presser" read from an instrument at the base of the Tower, a specified height above the ramp. Most modern commercial A/C are equipped with automatic systems that capture relevant data upon command/that is reset for each flight. Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Moore" wrote in message ... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude this is an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of ambient. When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading is above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure. In the Boeing aircraft that I flew (B-727,B-707,B-720) there were two gages on the FE's panel. One was a simple altimeter that indicated the cabin altitude at all times and the other, a differential pressure gage that indicated the difference in pressure between outside and inside. The maximum differential for those aircraft was around 8.6 psi. The only way to determine the absolute pressure inside the aircraft would be to use a graph to convert the altimeter indication to pressure. Bob Moore The protocols you reiterate above will translate to a ~ constant pressure of 12 PSI Gauge inside the cabin as the A/C moves through it's flight profile above ~ 11,000'. Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon Woellhaf" wrote in message news:jvFIb.85543$VB2.191432@attbi_s51... During the explosive decompression portion of my Air Force altitude chamber training, we sat in a small chamber adjacent to the larger main chamber with our masks off. The airtight door between the two chambers was closed. The large chamber was evacuated to 50,000 feet, or so. We were at about 10,000 feet and had our masks off. Without warning, the hatch between the chambers was suddenly opened. There was a loud bang, and the pressure in the two chambers very quickly equalized to about 30,000 feet. The whole chamber filled with thick fog. I felt for my mask and put it on. Ever after, I have been amused at the flight attendant's briefing, "In the unlikely event of a sudden loss of cabin pressure, the oxygen masks in front of you will automatically deploy. Simply put the mask over your mouth and nose and breath normally. Etc. etc." Yeah, right! First there's a loud bang and everyone thinks a bomb has gone off. Then the cabin fills with super cold thick fog. The pilot puts the plane in a dive to get to breathable air and the masks are hanging a couple feet in front of you. I think it would be absolute chaos. Have any of you experienced an actual explosive decompression while in flight? Jon Never experienced it personally, but have met 4 A/C that have over my 40+/- years of CFR/ARFF experience. There were a few injuries from flying stuff, otherwise many had "Bloody Noses", while some had "bleeding from the ears. In most instances those injured by various "Flying Objects" showed signs of hypoxia. Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim, if I install a transponder pin with a carbon fiber ground plane,
inside a fiberglass fuselage, what equipment is needed to see how well it's working? Or do I just fly around and ask ATC "Can you see me now? Can you see me now?" (actually, I've already installed it, but I'm not flying yet.) On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:57:13 -0800, Jim Weir wrote: :Yes, I got results on the carbon fiber and I would have SWORN that I posted them :to this site. : :Putting a GPS antenna UNDER a small bowl-shaped carbon fiber radome immediately :killed any GPS signal into a 27 dB gain active antenna INCLUDING satellites that :were directly overhead. : :Figuring that the carbon was so lousy a transmissive path, I drilled a hole on :the top of the bowl and used the bowl as the groundplane. VIOLA. The GPS :antenna worked every bit as well on TOP of the carbon fiber as it did on a metal :ground plane of approximately the same size. : :I can't say this is true for any other service than GPS (transponder, vhf nav & :com, etc.) but it did test well for GPS. : :Jim : : : :Richard Riley :shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: : :- :-Did you ever get results on the carbon? : :Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) :VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor :http://www.rst-engr.com |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... Was that in reference to a stray bullet causing the decompression? If so, I'd have to agree that he's full of it. Yes, just so. He agreed that the sky marshal would have frangible bullets, but argued that the terrorist would not. That would lead to a bullet through the airplane (he didn't specify window, which I understand to be a problem) followed by explosive decompression "and all that that entails." all the best -- Dan Ford The comments below are applicable to modern commercial Pax A/C. Anyone familiar with the structure of an A/C will immediately ROFL at the idea of a 9mm bullet penetrating the external skin if fired from inside the cabin. It would take a substantially more powerful weapon than a 9mm to cause a "Window Failure", even then impact would have to be near 90 degrees because of their "Plug design, plus they are thicker in the center than the edge This curvature is on the inside. The same applies to a bullet exiting through the A/C skin. Consider between what is seen as the interior cabin wall & the "External Skin" of the A/C is a layer of insulation, assorted wiring, plumbing in some places, plus untold ribs, stiffeners, & other assorted structural components all of which have some "Curvature" to them. All these components are riveted together through "Lap Joints". All joints/connections are sealed with "Sealant" of varying strengths. The structure of an A/C is designed to flex, expand, & contract as the A/C goes thru pressurization/de-pressurization cycles. There are a few places a "Very High Velocity Bullet" of large caliber could possibly exit the external skin if it the internal point of impact was at a "very specific angle, very close to 90 degrees to external skin" if fired from close range internally. Consider all the materials described above a bullet would have to impact/penetrate, without its path being diverted by some degree of ricochet. Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:04:08 -0500, "Ron Natalie"
wrote: "Bob Gardner" wrote in message news:bgFIb.16418$I07.44872@attbi_s53... Well, it's been awhile, John, and I can hardly remember things that happened last week, much less things that happened in the 70s. However, I do not recall anything odd happening to my body during the ascent to 25000 but do recall my lips doing the blub-blub-blub thing during the decompression. As the pressure in the chamber rapidly increased, it kinda pushed the trapped gas out. It's the other parts of your body doing the blub-blub-blub thing that's problematic. Just remember it's absolutely essential to drink lots of beer, eat a lot of chips with a hot dip and baked beans the night before to make the altitude chamber a truely memorable experience. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Nesbitt wrote in message
news ![]() "Robert Moore" wrote in message ... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude this is an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of ambient. When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading is above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure. In the Boeing aircraft that I flew (B-727,B-707,B-720) there were two gages on the FE's panel. One was a simple altimeter that indicated the cabin altitude at all times and the other, a differential pressure gage that indicated the difference in pressure between outside and inside. The maximum differential for those aircraft was around 8.6 psi. The only way to determine the absolute pressure inside the aircraft would be to use a graph to convert the altimeter indication to pressure. Bob Moore The protocols you reiterate above will translate to a ~ constant pressure of 12 PSI Gauge inside the cabin as the A/C moves through it's flight profile above ~ 11,000'. Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type http://books.nap.edu/books/030908289...6.html#pagetop http://print.nap.edu/pdf/0309082897/pdf_image/36.pdf Paul Nixon |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote:
"Cub Driver" wrote: Was that in reference to a stray bullet causing the decompression? If so, I'd have to agree that he's full of it. Yes, just so. He agreed that the sky marshal would have frangible bullets, but argued that the terrorist would not. That would lead to a bullet through the airplane (he didn't specify window, which I understand to be a problem) followed by explosive decompression "and all that that entails." The comments below are applicable to modern commercial Pax A/C. Anyone familiar with the structure of an A/C will immediately ROFL at the idea of a 9mm bullet penetrating the external skin if fired from inside the cabin. It would take a substantially more powerful weapon than a 9mm to cause a "Window Failure", even then impact would have to be near 90 degrees because of their "Plug design, plus they are thicker in the center than the edge This curvature is on the inside. The same applies to a bullet exiting through the A/C skin. Consider between what is seen as the interior cabin wall & the "External Skin" of the A/C is a layer of insulation, assorted wiring, plumbing in some places, plus untold ribs, stiffeners, & other assorted structural components all of which have some "Curvature" to them. All these components are riveted together through "Lap Joints". All joints/connections are sealed with "Sealant" of varying strengths. The structure of an A/C is designed to flex, expand, & contract as the A/C goes thru pressurization/de-pressurization cycles. There are a few places a "Very High Velocity Bullet" of large caliber could possibly exit the external skin if it the internal point of impact was at a "very specific angle, very close to 90 degrees to external skin" if fired from close range internally. Consider all the materials described above a bullet would have to impact/penetrate, without its path being diverted by some degree of ricochet. Really? I saw a movie in the 1960s where a guy with a .38 revolver tried to shoot another pax on an airliner (I think it was a DC-7), and he missed and the slug went through the cabin wall and hit an engine and set it on fire. :-] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Order your FREE Small Blue Planet Toys Christmas Catalog before Oct 20th! | Small Blue Planet Toys | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 15th 03 05:26 PM |
Invest small Earn Large ($20 000+) | promethean | General Aviation | 0 | October 3rd 03 06:08 AM |
Small Blue Planet Toys goes Postal !! Economy Shipping Options now availalble | Small Blue Planet Toys | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 11th 03 04:00 PM |