![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message link.net... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Seems a number of people have forgotten that liberalism has abandoned liberal principles. Modern liberalism is just monarchy dressed up in new clothes. It was not so long ago that the people who today call themselves liberals were called aristocrats and Tories. Bingo. Few people today understand the differences between classic liberalism and modern liberalism. They are polar opposites. I think it is funny as heck that liberals like to compare JFK's administration to Camelot. Shows what their real values are. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whenever we get into these kinds of discussions it usually means things are
going OK and we have no major issues to unite against. I hope all continues to go well this year, GA could use it! Peter |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Most of it comes from taxes on airline tickets. And airlines generate most of the costs. The average G/A guy who flys a Cessna 182 100 hours a year doesn't begin to pay for the system. The average G/A who flies a Cessna 182 100 hours a year doesn't begin to burden the system. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" writes:
"Theorem" wrote in message ... BllFs6 wrote: Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke If only it was even as good as that ![]() Liberalism is more imprisoning than communism ever thought of being while hiding under the fake facade of true freedom..... Jesus was a liberal. Then why do liberals hate him? Why don't liberals espouse the principals that Jesus taught? In fact, we do, mostly. We just deny that he's a particularly authoritative source, and arrive at many of the same principles from other directions. Now, if the *Christians* could just get together around those principles, we might have something. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Photos: dd-b.lighthunters.net Snapshots: www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Well, although that may be true for you, there are lots of Cessna 182's that make a lot of instrument approaches at airports with control towers. Or, even instrument approaches at airports without control towers; all supported by center equipment, controllers, FAA approach designers, expensive flight inspections, etc., etc. How many control towers would be shut down if those Cessna 182s did not exist? How many approaches could be dropped if those Cessna 182s did not exist? How many centers could be shut down? How many controllers could be terminated? Etc., etc., etc. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Well....that is true for the cost of the center building. It isn't necessarily true where an approach control serves what is primarily a general aviation airport. What's a primarily general aviation airport? One where the majority of the traffic is general aviation? Yup, there are plenty of airports with approach control facilities that have more general aviation traffic than air carrier traffic, but there aren't very many that would have approach control facilities if the airlines weren't there. And, it certainly isn't true for instrument approach procedures established for airports that have no commercial traffic (which is many, many more instrument approach procedures than those established for airports with mostly, or some, commercial operations. Yup. But a lot of those airports that have no commercial traffic today are airports that formerly had commercial traffic and exist only because they were built for the purpose of commercial traffic. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... I think it is funny as heck that liberals like to compare JFK's administration to Camelot. Shows what their real values are. I think it odd that Democrats call their party the party of Jefferson. If Jefferson was alive today he'd be vilified by Democrats as a right wing extremist. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote:
Seems a number of people have forgotten that liberalism has abandoned liberal principles. Yup, and it's distressing to see conservatism in America is doing the same thing WRT conservative principles. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... Yup, and it's distressing to see conservatism in America is doing the same thing WRT conservative principles. Bingo again. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Philip Sondericker" wrote in message ... Okay, I was gonna stay out of this, but since people are comparing liberalism to poison, cigarettes and other cancerous substances, it may be time to remind everyone that our country was founded on some quite liberal principles. Thomas Jefferson would likely be appalled to hear liberalism likened to "poison". Thomas Jefferson was a classic liberal. When people use the term "liberal" or "liberalism" today they are referring to modern liberalism. Classic liberalism and modern liberalism are polar opposites. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Owning | 314 | June 21st 04 06:10 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |