A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Manufacturing Quality



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old August 7th 06, 05:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default Manufacturing Quality


"Jonathan Goodish" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote:
Well, in 2005 Ford sold almost 10 times as many F-series trucks as the
closet Japanese competitor (Toyota). If 95% of truck buyers don't "use
it as a truck," there's still something that those buyers like better
about a Ford truck.


Its called the lemming affect. It took a while to fade in the car
market, but now it is almost gone, other than Toyota seems to be
developing it quite well for its cars. Trucks will follow,
unfortunately.



The Ford F-150 has been the best selling truck for 30 years straight.
It has been the best selling VEHICLE in the United States for quite a
number of consecutive years. That isn't because of a "lemming effect,"
though I know quite a few Honda and Toyota owners who are definitely
lemmings.

Ford would have to fall pretty hard for a pretty long time in order for
the Japanese to catch up. Ford's fall would have to be combined with a
broader and more capable line of Japanese trucks (i.e. heavy duty). So
far, the Japanese haven't been willing to make a truly heavy duty truck
for the mass market.

In 2005, Ford sold just shy of 1 million F-series trucks. The closest
Japanese competitor--Toyota--sold around 125,000 trucks. That's a huge
gap, and in the middle was Dodge with around 450,000 and GM, with
somewhere around 800,000, I believe. The Ford/GM dominance of the truck
market likely makes the costs to gain market share prohibitive for the
Japanese competitors.


Asuming ford will be around for any length of time. Ford's numbers are
dismal and Wall Street has their stock nearly down to junk value. The
Japanese can just sit and wait for Ford and GM to spiral into oblivion.



  #72  
Old August 7th 06, 05:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default Manufacturing Quality


"B A R R Y" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:15:32 -0600, Newps wrote:



But it could be done. Look at the goofy looking Civic Honda brought
over in the 70's. We all laughed.


Remember when people laughed and said "Who the hell would want a
Japanese luxury car?"

Along came Lexus...


Which is now the highest rated car overall and tops in nearly every
individual area.


  #73  
Old August 7th 06, 05:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default Manufacturing Quality


"Newps" wrote in message
...


Thomas Borchert wrote:

Newps,


We want big and powerful.



Until the fuel prices climb some more...


It's at $3 a gallon now and there's no sign of a let up in truck sales.


Except for the fact they can't give them away.


  #74  
Old August 7th 06, 08:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Manufacturing Quality

Stubby,

That's the only way I can explain guys driving around a load of air in
the back when they could be enjoying a nice Lexus.


You nailed it.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #75  
Old August 7th 06, 08:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Manufacturing Quality

Morgans,

but for
some it is not want, but *need*, for the big and powerful.


For some, yes. Few. At least in comparison to the stupid SUV sales
numbers.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #76  
Old August 7th 06, 08:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Manufacturing Quality

Newps,

It's at $3 a gallon now and there's no sign of a let up in truck sales.


See Barry's post.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #77  
Old August 7th 06, 12:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Manufacturing Quality

In an article before ,
someone wrote:

You don't fool people with an inferior product for very long.


unless you have something else going for you (like an monopoly).

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #78  
Old August 7th 06, 02:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Michelle Settle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Manufacturing Quality


"B A R R Y" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:15:32 -0600, Newps wrote:



But it could be done. Look at the goofy looking Civic Honda brought
over in the 70's. We all laughed.


Remember when people laughed and said "Who the hell would want a
Japanese luxury car?"

Along came Lexus...


If I remember correctly, the first Japanese luxury cars were the Acura and
the Toyota Cressida.

Michelle


  #79  
Old August 7th 06, 03:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Manufacturing Quality


"Newps" wrote in message
. ..


Jon Kraus wrote:
Heck, I see that Honda is now making a
better full-size pickup truck than Ford's F-150.


Please. I like Honda cars but that thing they build is not a full size
truck.


Well I bought a Ridgeline a few months and 7000 miles ago. While it isn't as
big as a full size Ford or Chevy it has LOTS of hauling room in the bed that
I get to use fully because I don't have to put a tool box in the back. The
reason I don't have to put in a tool box is because it has a lockable trunk
that I could hide a 250 body in. This trunk also has a drain and is somewhat
insulated so last 4th of July I filled it with ice and beer.

The thing rides like a luxury car and the back seats are real seats instead
of the padded rear wall that most 4 5 passenger trucks have.

So sure it can't pull more than 4000 pounds. I can live with that.


  #80  
Old August 7th 06, 03:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 178
Default Manufacturing Quality

Jose wrote:
You don't fool people with an inferior product for very long.
Chevy Chevette.

Exactly. How long did that last?


1975 to 1987. Plenty long. Twelve years, but it seemed like forever
(my wife had one). I guess it wasn't all that long, but it was the best
selling car of its time.


Fleets! All of my local utilities (water, power, telco, etc...) had
them. They had a "Scooter" version that didn't even come with armrests
or a back seat. I had one assigned to me as a telephone company CO
technician.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quality helicopter sim? AirDolphin Simulators 11 September 15th 06 06:04 AM
Poor Audio Quality, FlightCom 403 Stereo Intercom mikem Owning 5 April 17th 06 04:40 PM
ASA 100 ISO 9001 QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL QCMAN Products 0 December 16th 04 04:31 PM
Sailplane Manufacturing Sites/Information - College Project Matt Soaring 2 February 13th 04 02:11 PM
During hot air balloon races in Reno/Sparks, avoid Quality Inn Joe Clark General Aviation 0 July 18th 03 11:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.