A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

#1 Piston Fighter was British



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 1st 03, 05:11 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: #1 Piston Fighter was British
From: (The Revolution Will Not Be Televised)
Date: 7/1/03 8:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 30 Jun 2003 17:53:46 GMT,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

There were two constants on every mission. One was the 180mph cruise.


How would you know? Did you handle the throttles and observe the ASI
all the time? Did you calibrate the ASI youself? Did you experience
cleaning and replacing the pitot head personally or did you pick that
up third-hand?

The
second was the 4,000 pound bomb load.


Did you measure the weight yourself to confirm this, or were you
relying on other people to weigh & load the bombload?

I can still feel that 100 octane eating into my skin.


How did you know it was 100 octane and not 100/115 or 130/150 or 87
octane with the wrong dye? Does 100 octane provide a specific and
unique dermatological irritation which you recognised? In which case,
were you a qualified dermatologist to make that diagnosis in the first
place?

Gavin Bailey


I was the navigator as well as the Bombardier.. I calculated all ETA's on
180mph indicated converted to groundspeed to get ETA's. We calibrated our
airspeed indicators based on measured speed runs during shakedowns and
calibrated errors accordingly. I had a full set of instruments in front of me
at all times and watched them carefully. We had to hold airspeed to zero
tolerence to get bombing accuracy. We carried 8 500 pound bombs which I was
responsible for inspecting the loading, checking the arming wires for security
and making sure all the A=2 bomb shackles were properly installed.God, I never
dreamt you knew so little.

Arthur Kramer
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #4  
Old July 1st 03, 09:24 PM
The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 14:31:15 -0400, Stephen Harding
wrote:

You've made a fair point about personal experience versus historical
record, but you're really starting to sound asinine in this effort.


Thanks for your opinion. I note that you didn't make the point,
asinine or not.

I think all will agree there is a place for history and a place for
personal experience. We can probably all agree reading something and
personally experiencing something are not equivalent.


Of course not. I'd never suggested that, although I get the suspicion
that's what Art thinks I believe. It also appears to be an approach
he has erroneously attributed to several other posters on this group,
at least two of which have posted in this thread. If the tone of the
posts annoys you or you find them "asinine", I suggest you take it up
with the poster responsible for initiating the exchange at that level.
I'm happy enough to discuss things on a rational level, and I
genuinely respect Kramer's experience and contribution, but that
appears insufficient to maintain a rational and respectful level of
exchange on his part.

Fine by me, if that's how he prefers it.

We can probably all agree that being told our knowledge is inadequate
because it was not obtained by personal experience, or that your personal
experience is "wrong" or not general, based on someone's readings, can be
annoying in the extreme.


I'd like to know where I've ever done this to anybody, let alone Art
Kramer in particular.

Leave it at that and move on. No killfiling required from anyone!


This isn't the first instance of Art provoking such a reaction, and
your selectivity in responding is notable.

Gavin Bailey

--

"...this level of misinformation suggests some Americans may be
avoiding having an experience of cognitive dissonance."
- 'Poll shows errors in beliefs on Iraq, 9/11'
The Charlotte Observer, 20th June 2003
  #5  
Old July 1st 03, 09:58 PM
Stephen Harding
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Revolution Will Not Be Televised wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 14:31:15 -0400, Stephen Harding
wrote:

You've made a fair point about personal experience versus historical
record, but you're really starting to sound asinine in this effort.


Thanks for your opinion. I note that you didn't make the point,
asinine or not.


???
Never mind.

[snip]

I'm happy enough to discuss things on a rational level, and I


Well your little "did you weigh the bomb load" "discussion" is not really
rational and becoming tedious in its repetition. No need kicking a dead
horse.

This isn't the first instance of Art provoking such a reaction, and
your selectivity in responding is notable.


Well I don't agree with Art's statements that only personal experience is
worth anything in comparison to learned experience. We'd never really
know anything if that were true.

But I will admit I'm a fan of Art's and have just come to accept that he
has very strong opinions about things that aren't going to be easily changed,
and so be it. No point getting flustered about it.

Consider yourself fortunate you are not French!


SMH
  #7  
Old July 1st 03, 09:27 PM
The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:11:40 -0400, Cub Driver
wrote:

Sorry, I thought I was in your killfile.


I don't know about Art, but as of today you're in mine.


I'm somehow reminded of your exchanges with Eric Schilling at this
point. Perhaps your tolerance of being unreasonably dismissed by
veterans is higher than mine. I still read his contributions and
yours (and even bought your book as a consequence).

Gavin Bailey

--

"...this level of misinformation suggests some Americans may be
avoiding having an experience of cognitive dissonance."
- 'Poll shows errors in beliefs on Iraq, 9/11'
The Charlotte Observer, 20th June 2003
  #8  
Old July 2nd 03, 01:37 AM
Dave Holford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



ArtKramr wrote: (among other stuff)

We had to hold airspeed to zero tolerence to get bombing accuracy.

Arthur Kramer



"zero tolerance" Now I'm really impressed!

Dave
  #10  
Old July 2nd 03, 04:22 AM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: #1 Piston Fighter was British
From: av8r
Date: 7/1/03 2:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

Hi ya Art!

The 344th BG was the first group to attack Utah Beach. They bombed a
number of German coastal artillery sites. The next group over Utah
Beach was the 387th BG. Due to cloud cover, all bombing was carried out
below the cloud base. As I indicated in my previous e-mail, the cloud
base ranged from 1,650 ASL to 3,000 feet ASL. The 366th BG was the last
to drop its ordnance, just a mere five minutes before the initial
landings took place. They carpet bombed the area using 100 pound bombs
that tore up the barbed wire and explode buried land mines, both
anti-tank and anti-personnel. A beneficial side effect was that bombs
created instant fox holes. They were deep enough for the assaulting
ground forces to use yet not deep enough to hinder either the armored
nor landing vehicles.

Cheers...Chris



You said the magic words that make my blood run cold...100 pounders. (sheesh)We
carried 40 hundred pounders. 40 of the little *******s. Do you know how long
it takes to kick out 40 bombs by intervalometer flying straight and level with
your bomb bay doors open , low enough to take small arms fire?. A lifetime,
that's how long. Talk about time standing still. We used that same damned load
hitting the marshalling yards at Cologne, coming home full of small arms fire;
holes and dents. But those little *******s sure made short work of barbed wire
and railroad tracks and ties.

Arthur Kramer
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: 1990 "Hornet: The Inside Story of the F/A-18" Fighter Jet Book Jim Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 1 November 8th 05 09:06 AM
Fighter Ultralight Kevin Berlyn Home Built 0 January 15th 05 10:24 AM
Fighter Ultralight Website Kevin Berlyn Home Built 0 December 27th 04 10:11 AM
FS: 1990 "Hornet: The Inside Story of the F/A-18" Fighter Jet Book J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 December 4th 03 05:38 AM
FS: 1990 "Hornet: The Inside Story of the F/A-18" Fighter Jet Book Jim Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 September 15th 03 04:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.