Did the F/A-22 Raptor turn the corner in 2003?

I am pre-qualified as an expert witness, in California and Washington, WRT
electrical engineering matters.

Must be a typo. I think you meant expert witless.

Don't recall ever meeting your wife on my trips to the CTF for test
readiness
not at Plant 42 at the DPRO when the planes were accepted. I guess her
signature wold be on file in SPO records though, sonething that I could
check
if I knew her name. Kind of unusual because the other planes were bought
off
by MG Ralph Torino, the program director.

Those 6 were bought off by instrumentation, long before Torino stamped off
on them.

Funny, I thought planes were bought off after an FCA/PCA. How do you
instrument that?




Lets quit. You have twisted my pea brain around enough.

Odd that you would not know, unless you are one of those pico coffee bean
chewers.



Nope, ASD SPO. Told you that. You have been too busy dreaming up insults and
nonsense to be paying attention. Actually when I think about it Gens Scofield
and Torino would have bought off on them as FSD assets and Cols Reynolds,
Jabour, and Wolfenberger after they were upgraded in later years.

On 08 Jan 2004 17:19:46 GMT, (Denyav) wrote:

Stealth aircraft have a need for protection from the weather. It's got
nada to do with security from photos. And, many military bases don't
allow flight line pictures, even

Right,the passive stealth is an extremely "sight-sensitive" technology.Any
trained eye could figure out threat and non threat zones if he or she gets a
glimpse of the platform.
That was the reason why even the security personel were not allowed to look at
f117 during tests three decades ago.
But have you any idea why every US passive stealth platform is on display now
almost on daily basis?
Because you dont even need to know the shape of stealth platform in order to
effectively counter it now.
Technology did not stop thirty years ago.

True, Soviet technology stopped at least forty years ago.

Al Minyard

True, Soviet technology stopped at least forty years ago.

Yup.thats the reason why only US,UK and Germans managed to develop a working
multistatic system.

On 12 Jan 2004 06:13:52 GMT, (Denyav) wrote:

True, Soviet technology stopped at least forty years ago.

Yup.thats the reason why only US,UK and Germans managed to develop a working
multistatic system.

Utter bullsh**

Al Minyard

Utter bullsh**

Al Minyard

At least you should have respect for the system developed by countrymen.