If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
"Montblack" wrote in message ... ("Robert Henry" wrote) To some of their friends, I'm "the uncle guy" that says always hit the deer. BTW, congrats on missing that mountain deer. I've only hit one deer in over 25 years of driving, but I was on my motorcycle - so it's worth more points. g Do you also run over dogs, pregnant women and kids? Should someone run over you if you are in the road on a motorcycle or on foot? Why not, in the big scheme of things your life is not worth more than a deer's life? Montblack http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
I think the point is hit the deer rather than swerve into oncoming traffic.
Sorry but I'll hit the deer over the semi in the other lane or even the teenager with the **** box in the other lane. I hit a cat once. I could either hit a row of parked cars, head into oncoming traffic or hit the cat. I still feel bad about it and it was 23 years ago, but I made the correct choice. Margy Enrique wrote: "Montblack" wrote in message ... ("Robert Henry" wrote) To some of their friends, I'm "the uncle guy" that says always hit the deer. BTW, congrats on missing that mountain deer. I've only hit one deer in over 25 years of driving, but I was on my motorcycle - so it's worth more points. g Do you also run over dogs, pregnant women and kids? Should someone run over you if you are in the road on a motorcycle or on foot? Why not, in the big scheme of things your life is not worth more than a deer's life? Montblack http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
"Enrique" wrote in
: "Montblack" wrote in message ... ("Robert Henry" wrote) To some of their friends, I'm "the uncle guy" that says always hit the deer. BTW, congrats on missing that mountain deer. I've only hit one deer in over 25 years of driving, but I was on my motorcycle - so it's worth more points. g Do you also run over dogs, pregnant women and kids? Should someone run over you if you are in the road on a motorcycle or on foot? Why not, in the big scheme of things your life is not worth more than a deer's life? Montblack http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif If it that or kill someone else YES. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Henry wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message ... Robert Henry wrote: Gravel AND snow. Snow is quite common for about 5 months of the year here in PA! My only really bad ABS experience was in snow. Well, actually, I have quite the opposite - which is not an argument - just an experience relayed. I learned to drive in New England. Tangentially, I've always wanted a bumper sticker that read "Graduate: Boston School of Driving" I think fewer people would tailgate me...when I cut them off. just kidding I rear-ended someone once (not even any scratches) on a road covered newly by snow over a span of about 10 minutes. The white snow was heated by the warm engines at the intersection in the minutes before I got there. I almost fell when I got out of the car because the white glaze was extremely slick. It was extremely thin white ice (like glaze), not black. Moreover, I couldn't stop and I couldn't steer. If I had ABS, the outcome might have been different, and it could have been worse as I steered around the car and went right through the intersection into crossing traffic. I'll never know, but I do know I couldn't steer and braking was of little effect. I can actually remember looking at the speedometer going back and forth from 12-15 to 0, 10 to 0.... I was already in first gear in the automatic for conditions. I was thinking mainly of snow with some depth to it. Sounds like you are talking about snow that has been packed hard by traffic. That is really more like ice at that point. I don't make any claim that regular brakes are better on ice than ABS. Neither is worth a hoot unless you have chains or studded tires. Trust me, with ABS on ice or hard packed snow, you'll not have any braking either and likely won't be able to steer on top of that. Later, in the mountains of NY at 1am, there was an inch of snow on the road and snowing. A deer was in the middle of the road, there was oncoming traffic, and I was going about 40. As I got closer and the cars converged on the deer, the deer ran in front of me. I was able, somehow, to steer left into oncoming traffic as the deer went to my right, and steer back into my lane to avoid the oncoming traffic. When we finally came to a stop, I stalled the car, and couldn't restart it until I got a grip on what almost just happened. I know without ABS, I would have hit something. Why do you know that? ABS doesn't make you steer any better, unless you've locked your brakes. I agree that average to poor drivers will do better with ABS. Very good drivers will often not do much better and and can do worse with ABS, especially on dry pavement (threshold braking is better than the fast skid-release-skid-release of ABS) and soft surfaces such as sand, gravel and deep snow. On another occasion, I was entering an intersection during a downpour. The intersection was wide and unfamiliar. The two stop signs were four lanes apart; there are two dedicated turning lanes, one for each right and left and two through lanes. I was in the left through lane. As I realized there were cars entering from stops into the crossing intersection, I looked and found the stop signs for me well out of the visibility restricted peripheral vision. It was daylight and the pedestrian crossing lines added the rainwater obscuring the stop line. Honestly, in hindsight, I was driving too fast for conditions. As I slammed the brakes, I estimated the stopping distance would put me well into and maybe through the intersection. It occurred to me also that if I made a right turn into the intersection, I would have the possibility that vehicles crossing from the left would steer left of me if I stayed as far right as possible in the breakdown/parking lane as I turned right onto the crossing street. This also increased the stopping distance available before the intersection. The car stopped about 30 feet from the corner of the intersection after making the right turn. Without ABS, I am sure that I would have skidded straight through the intersection and t-boned the police car (no exaggeration) turning left. Most likely because of conditions, the police officer didn't come back around and issue a ticket for failure to stop. Yes, this is a condition where ABS can be valuable. However, good braking technique without ABS is about equally good. I ride motorcycles and subscribe to several motomags. In their tests of both ABS and non-ABS bikes, the non-ABS bikes have thus far always achieved shorter stopping distances with a skilled rider aboard. Matt |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Montblack wrote:
("Robert Henry" wrote) snip Later, in the mountains of NY at 1am, there was an inch of snow on the road and snowing. A deer was in the middle of the road, there was oncoming traffic, and I was going about 40. As I got closer and the cars converged on the deer, the deer ran in front of me. I was able, somehow, to steer left into oncoming traffic as the deer went to my right, and steer back into my lane to avoid the oncoming traffic. When we finally came to a stop, I stalled the car, and couldn't restart it until I got a grip on what almost just happened. I know without ABS, I would have hit something. We drill this into the heads of our high school age nieces: ALWAYS HIT THE DEER!!! Hit the deer at the slowest speed possible, sure ...but don't go nuts trying to avoid contact. Hell, I've had the nieces out practicing hitting deer. Look! A (real) semi is in the oncoming lane and a (real) huge pickup is behind you, there's an (imaginary) deer wandering out on the 2 lane road, and you're doing 50 mph. What do you do?...right now! Our Answer: Slow down - "thud", watching carefully your rearview mirror AND for that semi to cross into your lane ...trying to avoid hitting the second damn deer that just darted out on the other side of the road. We tell them hitting the deer is about 4th on the list of what's important - right now. Who's behind you, who's in front of you, and how's your car moving down the road are all that matter for the next 10 seconds. Drive the car!! (Hmm. Sounds familiar, like I've heard that somewhere before) To some of their friends, I'm "the uncle guy" that says always hit the deer. Yes, hitting the deer is better than hitting a car, tree, etc. But if the opposing lane is clear, it is better to try to steer around the deer. What this says is that, just like in aviation, situational awareness is key. You must always know what is beside and behind you, not just what is in front. You should be able to pretty much instantly make a decision as to what to do when a deer jumps out. The only problem with teaching people to always hit the deer (and I don't know that you are necessarily saying this here), is what happens when you replace deer with a kid on a bicycle or a steel ingot that just fell from a flatbed? I'd have to have someone have the "hit the obstacle" reflex so deeply ingrained that they hit a 10 year-old on a bike when the opposing lane was clear into the next county. BTW, congrats on missing that mountain deer. I've only hit one deer in over 25 years of driving, but I was on my motorcycle - so it's worth more points. Ouch! I've had some close calls on my Voyager, but so far haven't picked up any hair... Matt |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
("Enrique" wrote)
Do you also run over dogs, pregnant women and kids? Should someone run over you if you are in the road on a motorcycle or on foot? Why not, in the big scheme of things your life is not worth more than a deer's life? In the really-really-really BIG scheme of things, there's an asteroid out there that was taught - "Always hit the planet!" At which point, Montblack = a deer = a ladybug = Madagascar...all dust. Until that Kodak/Hubble moment happens - stealing a line from The West Wing: "Why is a [deer's] life worth less to me than an American life?" "I don't know, but it is." -- Montblack "I like to watch" http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:57:11 GMT, "Matthew S. Whiting"
wrote: snip I was taught, no matter what the target, don't suddenly swerve. In heavy traffic swerving can cause more problems than it solves. Like seat belts you are playing the odds. Always maintain control as long as possible. I had an SUV pull out in front of my Transam a couple years back. Had I swerved left I'd still have hit him, but it would have driven me right into oncoming traffic and spun him. Had I swerved right I'd have driven him right into that oncoming traffic and it would have put what was left of the TA into the big trees. Traffic was very heavy. When the parts settled two more cars coming from the other direction swerved to avoid the cars slowing down and they hit the SUV which was now setting in the left turn lane. That traffic doesn't slow for anything including stopped cars or icy road. Ouch! I've had some close calls on my Voyager, but so far haven't picked up any hair... I hit a deer during a night landing at GDW a few years back. There were no deer on the runway, but this one decided she wanted to be on the other side. The timing was about as close as it could get to minimize the damage. She was going so fast that her head hit behind the prop circle.. Just milliseconds earlier and she'd have hit the prop and nose gear. Milliseconds later and she'd have hit farther out on the wing where the impact would have had much more leverage and in a much more fragile area. As it was the impact ruptured the fuel bladder in the tank on that side, even though the deer did not make contact with the tank. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?) www.rogerhalstead.com Return address modified due to dumb virus checkers Matt |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Roger Halstead wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:57:11 GMT, "Matthew S. Whiting" wrote: snip I was taught, no matter what the target, don't suddenly swerve. In heavy traffic swerving can cause more problems than it solves. In heavy traffic, I agree. With no traffic, I completely disagree. Swerving is by far the most effective avoidance maneuver if you have a place to swerve too. This is true of cars, motorcycles, and particularly, airplanes. It is especially hard to stop the latter, even when on the ground! If you were taught to never, ever swerve, then you should ask for your money back as you had a lousy teacher. Like seat belts you are playing the odds. Always maintain control as long as possible. Absolutely. I never suggested losing control. I had an SUV pull out in front of my Transam a couple years back. Had I swerved left I'd still have hit him, but it would have driven me right into oncoming traffic and spun him. Had I swerved right I'd have driven him right into that oncoming traffic and it would have put what was left of the TA into the big trees. Traffic was very heavy. When the parts settled two more cars coming from the other direction swerved to avoid the cars slowing down and they hit the SUV which was now setting in the left turn lane. That traffic doesn't slow for anything including stopped cars or icy road. Read what I wrote earlier. I never suggested swerving into either traffic or large fixed objects. Nice that you snipped out the relevant parts of my previous post(s). Matt |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
"Enrique" wrote in
: Do you also run over dogs, pregnant women and kids? Should someone run over you if you are in the road on a motorcycle or on foot? Why not, in the big scheme of things your life is not worth more than a deer's life? You "hit the deer" because you will most likely injure your self and others less by doing that than swerving wildly into a tree, or worse, into oncoming traffic..... I imagine the points thing is more of a tounge in cheek .... -- ET "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:59:45 GMT, "Matthew S. Whiting"
wrote: snip Read what I wrote earlier. I never suggested swerving into either traffic or large fixed objects. Nice that you snipped out the relevant parts of my previous post(s). Don't take it personal, I always try to snip everything except the points I'm answering. Sometimes a bit extra gets lost. I hate to see a one line answer on two pages of accumulated post. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?) www.rogerhalstead.com Return address modified due to dumb virus checkers Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|