A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Presidential TFR @ Kill Devil Hills



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 17th 03, 04:36 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Montblack" wrote in message
...

Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:

1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.
2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has

ever
had.


Bush is clearly more intelligent than Clinton. Now, you'll of course
disagree with that, but if you examine their administrations you find that
Bush has accomplished more in three years than Clinton did in eight.

At least he didn't screw up as much stuff as Clinton did (and yes, he did
lay the ground work for running the 90's boom into the ditch).

I shudder to think what would have happened, post 9/11, if Gore had been in
office.

That said, I'll not vote to re-elect Bush, but I also shudder to think where
we'll end up with Dean, or worse yet, Hillary in office.



  #2  
Old December 17th 03, 05:30 PM
Booger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Montblack" wrote in

message
...

Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:

1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.
2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has

ever
had.


Bush is clearly more intelligent than Clinton. Now, you'll of course
disagree with that, but if you examine their administrations you find

that
Bush has accomplished more in three years than Clinton did in eight.

At least he didn't screw up as much stuff as Clinton did (and yes, he did
lay the ground work for running the 90's boom into the ditch).

I shudder to think what would have happened, post 9/11, if Gore had been

in
office.

That said, I'll not vote to re-elect Bush, but I also shudder to think

where
we'll end up with Dean, or worse yet, Hillary in office.


So if Dean or Hillary scare you so much, vote for Bush.


  #3  
Old December 17th 03, 11:20 PM
David Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

I shudder to think what would have happened, post 9/11, if Gore had been

in
office.


OUR GUY LOST! GET OVER IT ALREADY!

-- David Brooks


  #4  
Old December 17th 03, 08:21 AM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

("Steven P. McNicoll" wrote)
Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:

1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.
2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has

ever
had.


Bush is clearly more intelligent than Clinton. Now, you'll of course
disagree with that, but if you examine their administrations you find that
Bush has accomplished more in three years than Clinton did in eight.



Steven - just jumping in on your post because I deleted the other replies
already.

1. I don't think GW is dumb, stupid or inept.
2. I *do* think raw intellect is something you can get a sense of - much
like charisma, warmth and sincerely.

3. Intellect is not the end all in setting up a successful administration.

4. For example: GW doesn't answer questions with a strong command of the
situation (news conferences/interviews/etc). Clinton owned those situations
for the better part of 8 years. This is where 75% of my "Presidential
Intellect" observations come from.

If there are maybe 10 criteria that Bush, and all former Presidents are
scored on - and intellect is one of them, then I sincerely believe Bush
would rank near the bottom (compared to past Presidents) in that one
category - raw intelligence.

Now it comes down to definitions of intellect.

--
Montblack
http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif


  #5  
Old December 17th 03, 05:21 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
...

Steven - just jumping in on your post because I deleted the other replies
already.

1. I don't think GW is dumb, stupid or inept.
2. I *do* think raw intellect is something you can get a sense of - much
like charisma, warmth and sincerely.

3. Intellect is not the end all in setting up a successful

administration.

4. For example: GW doesn't answer questions with a strong command of the
situation (news conferences/interviews/etc). Clinton owned those

situations
for the better part of 8 years. This is where 75% of my "Presidential
Intellect" observations come from.

If there are maybe 10 criteria that Bush, and all former Presidents are
scored on - and intellect is one of them, then I sincerely believe Bush
would rank near the bottom (compared to past Presidents) in that one
category - raw intelligence.

Now it comes down to definitions of intellect.


What did Bush do to cause you to conclude he is one of our least intelligent
Presidents? What did Clinton do to cause you to conclude he is one of our
most intelligent Presidents?


  #6  
Old December 17th 03, 04:19 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
...
| ("MikeM" wrote)
| Bush is an IDIOT!
|
|
| Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:
|
| 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.

Still smarter than you.

| 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever
| had.
|

Not saying much. The guy allowed himself to be blackmailed by an intern, for
crying out loud.

If intelligence had anything to do with it, they would make ME president!


--
Christopher J. Campbell
World Famous Flight Instructor
Port Orchard, WA


If you go around beating the Bush, don't complain if you rile the animals.



  #7  
Old December 17th 03, 06:23 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
...
| ("MikeM" wrote)
| Bush is an IDIOT!
|
|
| Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:
|
| 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.
| 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever
| had.
|

What you say may be true, but Reagan was smarter than Clinton. In fact, he
probably still is.


  #8  
Old December 17th 03, 07:01 PM
Tony Cox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Montblack" wrote in message
...
| ("MikeM" wrote)
| Bush is an IDIOT!
|
|
| Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:
|
| 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.
| 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has

ever
| had.
|

What you say may be true, but Reagan was smarter than Clinton. In fact, he
probably still is.


Why does everyone seem to think intelligence is particularly
important? The 'smartest' government in UK history was that
of Harold Wilson in the 60's, with 6 Oxbridge stared 1st's in
the cabinet. They proceeded to bugger up everything they
touched (and being socialists, they wanted to touch everything).

Smart people tend to believe they know it all. Give me
superior judgment with a touch of humility any day.

--
Dr. Tony Cox
Citrus Controls Inc.
e-mail:
http://CitrusControls.com/


  #9  
Old December 17th 03, 07:10 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tony Cox" wrote in message
ink.net...

Why does everyone seem to think intelligence is particularly
important? The 'smartest' government in UK history was that
of Harold Wilson in the 60's, with 6 Oxbridge stared 1st's in
the cabinet. They proceeded to bugger up everything they
touched (and being socialists, they wanted to touch everything).

Smart people tend to believe they know it all. Give me
superior judgment with a touch of humility any day.


Smart people abhor socialism.


  #10  
Old December 16th 03, 10:56 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , MikeM
wrote:

Does anyone else find it ironic that the President's very presence at
the celebration of 100 years of powered flight has shut down almost
2,000 square miles of airspace?


Bush is an IDIOT!


well, that certainly settles the issue.

--
Bob Noel
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract Tiger Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 05:24 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? Larry Dighera Piloting 38 November 19th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.