![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... "Montblack" wrote in message ... Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being: 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents. 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever had. Bush is clearly more intelligent than Clinton. Now, you'll of course disagree with that, but if you examine their administrations you find that Bush has accomplished more in three years than Clinton did in eight. At least he didn't screw up as much stuff as Clinton did (and yes, he did lay the ground work for running the 90's boom into the ditch). I shudder to think what would have happened, post 9/11, if Gore had been in office. That said, I'll not vote to re-elect Bush, but I also shudder to think where we'll end up with Dean, or worse yet, Hillary in office. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... "Montblack" wrote in message ... Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being: 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents. 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever had. Bush is clearly more intelligent than Clinton. Now, you'll of course disagree with that, but if you examine their administrations you find that Bush has accomplished more in three years than Clinton did in eight. At least he didn't screw up as much stuff as Clinton did (and yes, he did lay the ground work for running the 90's boom into the ditch). I shudder to think what would have happened, post 9/11, if Gore had been in office. That said, I'll not vote to re-elect Bush, but I also shudder to think where we'll end up with Dean, or worse yet, Hillary in office. So if Dean or Hillary scare you so much, vote for Bush. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
... I shudder to think what would have happened, post 9/11, if Gore had been in office. OUR GUY LOST! GET OVER IT ALREADY! -- David Brooks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Steven P. McNicoll" wrote)
Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being: 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents. 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever had. Bush is clearly more intelligent than Clinton. Now, you'll of course disagree with that, but if you examine their administrations you find that Bush has accomplished more in three years than Clinton did in eight. Steven - just jumping in on your post because I deleted the other replies already. 1. I don't think GW is dumb, stupid or inept. 2. I *do* think raw intellect is something you can get a sense of - much like charisma, warmth and sincerely. 3. Intellect is not the end all in setting up a successful administration. 4. For example: GW doesn't answer questions with a strong command of the situation (news conferences/interviews/etc). Clinton owned those situations for the better part of 8 years. This is where 75% of my "Presidential Intellect" observations come from. If there are maybe 10 criteria that Bush, and all former Presidents are scored on - and intellect is one of them, then I sincerely believe Bush would rank near the bottom (compared to past Presidents) in that one category - raw intelligence. Now it comes down to definitions of intellect. -- Montblack http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote in message ... Steven - just jumping in on your post because I deleted the other replies already. 1. I don't think GW is dumb, stupid or inept. 2. I *do* think raw intellect is something you can get a sense of - much like charisma, warmth and sincerely. 3. Intellect is not the end all in setting up a successful administration. 4. For example: GW doesn't answer questions with a strong command of the situation (news conferences/interviews/etc). Clinton owned those situations for the better part of 8 years. This is where 75% of my "Presidential Intellect" observations come from. If there are maybe 10 criteria that Bush, and all former Presidents are scored on - and intellect is one of them, then I sincerely believe Bush would rank near the bottom (compared to past Presidents) in that one category - raw intelligence. Now it comes down to definitions of intellect. What did Bush do to cause you to conclude he is one of our least intelligent Presidents? What did Clinton do to cause you to conclude he is one of our most intelligent Presidents? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote in message ... | ("MikeM" wrote) | Bush is an IDIOT! | | | Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being: | | 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents. Still smarter than you. | 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever | had. | Not saying much. The guy allowed himself to be blackmailed by an intern, for crying out loud. If intelligence had anything to do with it, they would make ME president! -- Christopher J. Campbell World Famous Flight Instructor Port Orchard, WA If you go around beating the Bush, don't complain if you rile the animals. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote in message ... | ("MikeM" wrote) | Bush is an IDIOT! | | | Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being: | | 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents. | 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever | had. | What you say may be true, but Reagan was smarter than Clinton. In fact, he probably still is. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... "Montblack" wrote in message ... | ("MikeM" wrote) | Bush is an IDIOT! | | | Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being: | | 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents. | 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever | had. | What you say may be true, but Reagan was smarter than Clinton. In fact, he probably still is. Why does everyone seem to think intelligence is particularly important? The 'smartest' government in UK history was that of Harold Wilson in the 60's, with 6 Oxbridge stared 1st's in the cabinet. They proceeded to bugger up everything they touched (and being socialists, they wanted to touch everything). Smart people tend to believe they know it all. Give me superior judgment with a touch of humility any day. -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony Cox" wrote in message ink.net... Why does everyone seem to think intelligence is particularly important? The 'smartest' government in UK history was that of Harold Wilson in the 60's, with 6 Oxbridge stared 1st's in the cabinet. They proceeded to bugger up everything they touched (and being socialists, they wanted to touch everything). Smart people tend to believe they know it all. Give me superior judgment with a touch of humility any day. Smart people abhor socialism. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , MikeM
wrote: Does anyone else find it ironic that the President's very presence at the celebration of 100 years of powered flight has shut down almost 2,000 square miles of airspace? Bush is an IDIOT! well, that certainly settles the issue. -- Bob Noel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 05:24 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 38 | November 19th 03 04:04 PM |