zoom's zooming againZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

It's no different than you claiming you're hot **** because you got wanked
into the "hall of fame." Someone who really did do those things and earned
them doesn't need to try to throw them in people's faces.


Interesting you would choose that argument while defending zoom.

For the record do you know Ignacio Rivera Guadalupe He is a friend of
mine. Haven't seen him for awhile but he is a policeman in San Juan.
Kinda of evens out the turf puts it back to one on one. Besides you are
so brave why would you need the police. Only one reason you are
following the lead of your puppeteer zzzoom and hiding behind the
police,he is an expert at that. However the last tjme he tried to sic
the police on me he got tossed at Sun N Fun.

Cut the BS and the smoke screen and answer the questions I posed to
you.

Frank M.Hitlaw
Jakarta, Indonesia

Juan,

Since you appear to know more about the Walton crash than anyone else here,
please end the suspense and tell us what caused it. No finger pointing, no
accusations, just what caused the crash, in simple English. I'm not
interested in accusations against this person or that person, this company
or that company, just what caused John Walton's plane to go in. If it was a
design flaw, then tell us, as accurately as possible, what that design flaw
was, and what needs to be done to correct it. Not PAST design flaws, but
the one that caused Walton to crash. And note that I have addressed you as
a peer. Please accord me that same courtesy. Thank you.

Red

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...


Here's a quote from yesterdays ANN article:

"ANN's Jim Campbell, flying an R-44 helo (which is
proving to be an impressive load-hauler, even in the
oppressive heat) in outlying disaster areas..."

What a hoot he's got them convinced at the home office that he's flying
relief
missions in a R-44 . Bet he was getting a free ride in one for an article
and
wasn't even flying solo let alone flying "loads" as he's implying. Our
hero :-)
I bet jauns swooning LOL!!

Sorry but this was just too funny to pass up.

See ya

Chuck (never been a hero) S

You got that right, you never have been and never will be, you only
eliminate them, not become them. So what are you doing to help the victims
of Katrina? Sitting on your fat ass at home, wondering how you're going to
fight that lawsuit, or trying to come up with better, improved ways of
claiming that people die because they forget to install the
"optional/required" fuselage cover? That autopsy report must have hit you
like the proverbial ton of bricks!

Too hypocritical to pass up, putz.

Juan

Well, then next time you need to buy an irony meter made out of steely.

{;-)


Jim


"Richard Riley" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 02:12:12 GMT, "LCT Paintball"
wrote:

:
:
: It's no different than you claiming you're hot **** because you got
wanked
: into the "hall of fame." Someone who really did do those things and
earned
: them doesn't need to try to throw them in people's faces.
:
:
:Interesting you would choose that argument while defending zoom.

Yeah. It made my irony meter explode. And I paid extra for a heavy
duty industrial grade irony meter just last year.

Chuck: I liked your: "All sizzle and no bacon" Another one that sticks in
my mind was " All Hat and no cows"

I think it's "All hat, no cattle". "Cows" doesn't sound manly enough.
--
Mickey

In article , Juan Jimenez says...
OK pucho where in the media did I say that?? Give us the source. Where did
I say
he crashed because he didn't have the standard equiptment fuselage cover
on?
Back up what you say for once.

EVERYWHERE, meathead. You spoke to an AP reporter, remember? Or did you
think we wouldn't see that?

OK pucho one more time, exactly where did I say he crashed because he didn't
have a fuselage cover? Sure I talked to a lot of reporters but I never said that
he crashed because he didn't have a fuselage cover.YOU made that up since
you can't tell the truth any better then your hero zoom.

Chuck S

"credibility it's all about credibility" chuck s

In article , Juan Jimenez says...


"BobR" wrote in message
oups.com...

Gee, Chuck, the source was that great reporter for the Aero-News
Nutwork, Jaun(wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on the ass)
Knowitall.

http://www.jacksonholestartrib.com/a...3a00803ed5.txt

Wrong again, BillyBob! Yuk! chuckle


Actually your exactly right Bob .Here's what I said right from jaun's source:

"It's not designed to fly without a fuselage cover," Slusarczyk said, adding
that he hopes to visit Jackson, see the wreckage and confer with the National
Transportation Safety Board to help determine the cause of the crash."

It wasn't designed to without a fuselage cover but I never said that's why it
crashed. That is a figment of jauns imagination It's no wonder that not even
zoom wants jaun to write for him LOL!!!

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Oh, so you're above the law?

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...
Won't even need the videocrew, I've got two professional photogs to
document
Frank's short trip to the island and the five finger salute on his face.

I can just see this punk trying to convince a Puertorican cop in my turf
that I should go to jail for assaulting him. ROFL!

"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:kWzTe.7513$jh7.4327@trndny06...
Can we all put together a fund to send Frank to PR with a video crew?

I would like to see:

A) Juan slap him and end up in jail for assault.

or

B) Juan not show up (more likely) and post the footage on a website,
along
with a copy of Juan's threat and the e-mail stating exactly when the
flight
arrives.

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article , Juan Jimenez says...


"BobR" wrote in message
oups.com...

Gee, Chuck, the source was that great reporter for the Aero-News
Nutwork, Jaun(wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on the ass)
Knowitall.

http://www.jacksonholestartrib.com/a...3a00803ed5.txt

Wrong again, BillyBob! Yuk! chuckle


Actually your exactly right Bob .Here's what I said right from jaun's source:

"It's not designed to fly without a fuselage cover," Slusarczyk said, adding
that he hopes to visit Jackson, see the wreckage and confer with the National
Transportation Safety Board to help determine the cause of the crash."

It wasn't designed to without a fuselage cover but I never said that's why it
crashed. That is a figment of jauns imagination It's no wonder that not even
zoom wants jaun to write for him LOL!!!

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Poor Jaun, he never learned english very well and can't seem to
understand the "may" is not an absolute. He sees what he wants to see
and NOTHING else. The only one who has said anything absolute was Jaun
accusing the plane design as being at fault. Wonder where he came up
with that information...imagination or just an out and out lie.

Actually your exactly right Bob .Here's what I said right from jaun's
source:

"It's not designed to fly without a fuselage cover," Slusarczyk said,
adding
that he hopes to visit Jackson, see the wreckage and confer with the
National
Transportation Safety Board to help determine the cause of the crash."

It wasn't designed to without a fuselage cover but I never said that's why
it
crashed.
Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret


Just to play devils advocate here, you were talking to a reporter about the
fatal crash of one of you ultralight designs. If you didn't intend to infer
that flying the ultralight without a fuselage may have contributed to the
crash why on earth would you mention it?

Ric