![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote:
"cjcampbell" wrote in message Jim Macklin wrote: LOL BTW, matter transmission as done on StarTrek can NEVER happen and just because of the Heisenberg (sp) effect. Einstein's equation works both ways, E=MC^2 means that to create matter with a weight equal to a person would require the energy of several thousand atomic bombs, under full control and without destruction of the mechanism. The only reason it works on Star Trek is because of the discovery of controlled matter-antimatter reactions. In the early days it was difficult and dangerous, but dilithium crystals found on other planets made control of the reaction much easier. The transporter was impossible without the crystals, The transporter on Star Trek works because they were scheduled to start shooting and the shuttle craft / set wasn't done so they had to come up with something quick to get up and down to a planet. Geoff: Please cease your rational, pragmatic, logical and truthful comments in this thread. They just don't make sense. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"cjcampbell" wrote in
oups.com: But back to light sabers. Larry Niven in his stories posited a "variable sword." This is actually a wire only one molecule thick (and therefore extremely sharp) coiled in the handle of a flashlight-like device. The wire can be extended out any length up to about four feet. It is held straight and rigid by a force field that affects only the wire -- the same type of force field that enables spaceships to crash into planets without harm to the occupants (although they may be buried beneath tons of rock). If this was a glowing force field, it would look just like a light saber. So you could say that Lucas was just copying something that Larry Niven had already invented. Larry Niven? Wasn't he in the Pink Panther? The Pink Panther didn't have a light sabre! |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Judah wrote: "cjcampbell" wrote in oups.com: But back to light sabers. Larry Niven in his stories posited a "variable sword." This is actually a wire only one molecule thick (and therefore extremely sharp) coiled in the handle of a flashlight-like device. The wire can be extended out any length up to about four feet. It is held straight and rigid by a force field that affects only the wire -- the same type of force field that enables spaceships to crash into planets without harm to the occupants (although they may be buried beneath tons of rock). If this was a glowing force field, it would look just like a light saber. So you could say that Lucas was just copying something that Larry Niven had already invented. Larry Niven? Wasn't he in the Pink Panther? The Pink Panther didn't have a light sabre! That was David Niven. And, while I haven't looked, I would be surprised if the Pink Panther has never had a light sabre. Larry Niven wrote a series of novels called the Known Space novels. One of the things common to all these novels is the stasis field, a kind of force field in which time ceases to exist. Thus, it does not keep other objects out by means of a wall of energy, but because time does not pass within the forcefield, anything starting to enter the stasis field is frozen by time and pushed away. Larry Niven also was one of the creators of The Green Lantern. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"cjcampbell" wrote in
oups.com: That was David Niven. And, while I haven't looked, I would be surprised if the Pink Panther has never had a light sabre. Larry Niven wrote a I knew it was David Niven. I was a making what was evidently a bad joke. series of novels called the Known Space novels. One of the things common to all these novels is the stasis field, a kind of force field in which time ceases to exist. Thus, it does not keep other objects out by means of a wall of energy, but because time does not pass within the forcefield, anything starting to enter the stasis field is frozen by time and pushed away. Sounds like the Cone of Silence! But if Time is frozen, objects shouldn't be pushed away - that would require an opposing force. They should simply freeze in time and stop moving, perhaps collapsing upon themselves as the balance of the entering object continues through the field. Seems pretty simple to me. Larry Niven also was one of the creators of The Green Lantern. I used to like the Green Lantern when I was a kid. But now that you've described the horrible lack of logic endowed by his creators, I have lost all respect for Greeny. I guess it's back to Superman for me. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
check the writing of Keith Lamur, of course Isaac Asimov.
Too much of the novels in the sci-fi section are sexual fantasy, bring back the good shoot 'em up space opera. "Judah" wrote in message . .. | "cjcampbell" wrote in | oups.com: | | That was David Niven. And, while I haven't looked, I would be surprised | if the Pink Panther has never had a light sabre. Larry Niven wrote a | | I knew it was David Niven. I was a making what was evidently a bad joke. | | series of novels called the Known Space novels. One of the things | common to all these novels is the stasis field, a kind of force field | in which time ceases to exist. Thus, it does not keep other objects out | by means of a wall of energy, but because time does not pass within the | forcefield, anything starting to enter the stasis field is frozen by | time and pushed away. | | Sounds like the Cone of Silence! | | But if Time is frozen, objects shouldn't be pushed away - that would require | an opposing force. They should simply freeze in time and stop moving, perhaps | collapsing upon themselves as the balance of the entering object continues | through the field. Seems pretty simple to me. | | Larry Niven also was one of the creators of The Green Lantern. | | I used to like the Green Lantern when I was a kid. But now that you've | described the horrible lack of logic endowed by his creators, I have lost all | respect for Greeny. I guess it's back to Superman for me. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" writes:
check the writing of Keith Lamur, of course Isaac Asimov. Too much of the novels in the sci-fi section are sexual fantasy, bring back the good shoot 'em up space opera. A lot of science-fiction targets testosterone-befuddled young males, so this is understandable. Asimov was nice because he managed to do without the sex stuff. Clarke usually manages that, too. Larry Niven has great science but there's too much fantasy-adventure and sex thrown in. Too much of _Ringworld_ is spent in what turns out to be a medieval adventure-novel atmosphere. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Judah wrote: "cjcampbell" wrote in oups.com: That was David Niven. And, while I haven't looked, I would be surprised if the Pink Panther has never had a light sabre. Larry Niven wrote a I knew it was David Niven. I was a making what was evidently a bad joke. series of novels called the Known Space novels. One of the things common to all these novels is the stasis field, a kind of force field in which time ceases to exist. Thus, it does not keep other objects out by means of a wall of energy, but because time does not pass within the forcefield, anything starting to enter the stasis field is frozen by time and pushed away. Sounds like the Cone of Silence! But if Time is frozen, objects shouldn't be pushed away - that would require an opposing force. They should simply freeze in time and stop moving, perhaps collapsing upon themselves as the balance of the entering object continues through the field. Seems pretty simple to me. Larry Niven also was one of the creators of The Green Lantern. I used to like the Green Lantern when I was a kid. But now that you've described the horrible lack of logic endowed by his creators, I have lost all respect for Greeny. I guess it's back to Superman for me. Well, Niven is not really one of the creators; he merely wrote the Green Lantern bible for DC. So you can keep liking Greeny. Superman has his own logic problems. Like, how did Martha Kent sew Superman's invulnerable costume? How did Superman manage to cut those lenses for his glasses out of the indestructible cockpit bubble? Larry Niven, btw, wrote an article called "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex." It described the physics of Superman and Lois Lane ever getting together and why it was an impossibility. Superman, of course, is grandfathered under the FARs. His pilot certificate is signed by Orville Wright. He is also authorized to fly through all restricted areas, TFRs, and other restricted airspace without filing any notification or requesting permission. I am still waiting for a couple FAA types to try to "Hoover" Superman. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the old Superman TV series with George Reeves. The
"bad guy" shots at him and we see the "Man of Steel" stand there, hands on hips as the bullets are bouncing off his chest. After 6 shots the bad gut throws his gun at him and Superman ducks. "cjcampbell" wrote in message ups.com... | | Judah wrote: | "cjcampbell" wrote in | oups.com: | | That was David Niven. And, while I haven't looked, I would be surprised | if the Pink Panther has never had a light sabre. Larry Niven wrote a | | I knew it was David Niven. I was a making what was evidently a bad joke. | | series of novels called the Known Space novels. One of the things | common to all these novels is the stasis field, a kind of force field | in which time ceases to exist. Thus, it does not keep other objects out | by means of a wall of energy, but because time does not pass within the | forcefield, anything starting to enter the stasis field is frozen by | time and pushed away. | | Sounds like the Cone of Silence! | | But if Time is frozen, objects shouldn't be pushed away - that would require | an opposing force. They should simply freeze in time and stop moving, perhaps | collapsing upon themselves as the balance of the entering object continues | through the field. Seems pretty simple to me. | | Larry Niven also was one of the creators of The Green Lantern. | | I used to like the Green Lantern when I was a kid. But now that you've | described the horrible lack of logic endowed by his creators, I have lost all | respect for Greeny. I guess it's back to Superman for me. | | Well, Niven is not really one of the creators; he merely wrote the | Green Lantern bible for DC. So you can keep liking Greeny. | | Superman has his own logic problems. Like, how did Martha Kent sew | Superman's invulnerable costume? How did Superman manage to cut those | lenses for his glasses out of the indestructible cockpit bubble? | | Larry Niven, btw, wrote an article called "Man of Steel, Woman of | Kleenex." It described the physics of Superman and Lois Lane ever | getting together and why it was an impossibility. | | Superman, of course, is grandfathered under the FARs. His pilot | certificate is signed by Orville Wright. He is also authorized to fly | through all restricted areas, TFRs, and other restricted airspace | without filing any notification or requesting permission. I am still | waiting for a couple FAA types to try to "Hoover" Superman. | |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: "Jim Macklin" writes: check the writing of Keith Lamur, of course Isaac Asimov. Too much of the novels in the sci-fi section are sexual fantasy, bring back the good shoot 'em up space opera. A lot of science-fiction targets testosterone-befuddled young males, so this is understandable. Asimov was nice because he managed to do without the sex stuff. Clarke usually manages that, too. Larry Niven has great science but there's too much fantasy-adventure and sex thrown in. Too much of _Ringworld_ is spent in what turns out to be a medieval adventure-novel atmosphere. Could be worse. Heinlein, for example. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim Macklin wrote: I like the old Superman TV series with George Reeves. The "bad guy" shots at him and we see the "Man of Steel" stand there, hands on hips as the bullets are bouncing off his chest. After 6 shots the bad gut throws his gun at him and Superman ducks. George Reeves also looked like a normal human being. He didn't worry about his abs -- he had a real stomach. I never have figured out why people think they need these fantastically strong abs. All they do is keep your guts from falling out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airtex Interior Refurbish - Day 48 | Mike Spera | Owning | 4 | May 16th 05 07:10 PM |
JFT - Ejection Seat Question | Pat Carpenter | Naval Aviation | 1 | March 8th 04 11:05 PM |
Ejection Seat parts needed please!!!! | Chris Jamesson | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 06:00 PM |
LF: ACES II ejection seat | Tim Bayne | Military Aviation | 2 | September 20th 03 10:57 PM |
ACES II ejection seat | Davide | Products | 0 | September 20th 03 10:57 PM |