![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Casey" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:44:56 -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote: There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just enough to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the beginning of the Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets, they stated that the buried many of them to get the new jets. You should email these folks to help them set their records straight: Air Force History Support Office Reference and Analysis Branch AFHSO/HOR You do it if it's that important to you. History is written by the winners and we all know that there is only the history that we are fed. Sort of like, "What was the real reason behind the Civil War". History says that it was over slavery (depending on whom you speak to), the North says it was about the Secession of the South. But the South says it was over the one sided economics of the day. It was definately NOT slavery as Lincoln vetoed the Emancipation the first time through. But you keep reading those books and stay inside. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Replacement_Tommel" 'SINVA LIDBABY wrote in message ... In article , redc1c4 says... Daryl Hunt wrote: (massive snipage, fore and aft) You missed the P-38 that outlived both the P(F)-51 and the P-47 in the enventories. I remember seeing a flight outside Denver flying over out of Buckley in the late 50s. so i asked the folks who would know: To: AFHSO Research Subject: P 38 Lightning question when was it pulled from active duty? their reply: The P-38 was taken out of front line service in 1949. Many were sold to private individuals. 50 were sold to Italy and 12 were ceded to Honduras. Air Force History Support Office Reference and Analysis Branch AFHSO/HOR and when i asked, (so you couldn't claim they belonged to the "Guards"): thanks for your quick response... i have one quick follow-up: were any retained by Reserve units, or does the phrase "taken out of front line service" mean that the AF stopped all use at that time?: they said: I can find no mention of P-38's being flown by Air Force guard or reserve units. Air Force History Support Office Reference and Analysis Branch AFHSO/HOR so, we're not sure what you were taking/drinking/smoking back in the day, anymore than we are now. the only possible conclusions are that it is some gooooooooooood **** or you're hypoxic. either that, or you're a congenital liar. redc1c4, (yes, this is a SPNAK! %-) -- IIRC when WWII was over the USAF had a choice between scrapping the P-51 or scrapping the P-47, since the P-51 was a "sexier" plane, they chose the P-51 (desiginated F-51 later on). When Korea rolled around, the prop jobs were assigned CAS duties. The Navy and the Marines were using air-cooled Corsairs (not the SLUF Daryl, the original one - the bent wing bird) and enjoyerd a greater success with them than the USAF did. Gee and to think you made the claim that they went out of service in 1949. Imagine that. They were used into the 1950s exactly as I stated. The P-38 was as well as the P-51. Now, answer this one. Why was the Corsair such a sucky bird overall and why did the Gyrenes drool when a P-38 past them in flight? Why were there so many ground loops from the F-4U? Time for you to hit the google search engine and the books once again. But make sure you stay inside. It's not safe out in the real world. Why? Because an air-cooled engine is a lot more rugged when hit by groundfire than a liquid-cooled engine is. hate to bust your bubble but I entered the AF as a Recip Mechanic. It was later on changed to Propulsion Technician. My uniforms weren't green. They were black. The P-38 was the first fighter to be able to disengage anytime it wished. The others didn't have that option. As one Lighting pilot put it, "If I was Jumped from above and didn't like the situation, I just disengaged". If the 38 lost an engine, they found the nearest cloud bank and hid out. Unless you were in one of the pieces of crap that was sold to the British, that is. Now, what was the main difference between the export 38s and the domestic? Comon Hero, let's hear it. BTW red, he'll just claim that the Air Force History Support Office is full of it... No, just you. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Daryl Hunt says...
"Replacement_Tommel" 'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in message IIRC when WWII was over the USAF had a choice between scrapping the P-51 or scrapping the P-47, since the P-51 was a "sexier" plane, they chose the P-51 (desiginated F-51 later on). When Korea rolled around, the prop jobs were assigned CAS duties. The Navy and the Marines were using air-cooled Corsairs (not the SLUF Daryl, the original one - the bent wing bird) and enjoyerd a greater success with them than the USAF did. Gee and to think you made the claim that they went out of service in 1949. Apparently, the P-38 Lightning did. Imagine that. They were used into the 1950s exactly as I stated. I mentioned the P-51 (F-51), the P-47 and the the Corsair. The P-38 was gone by then, Daryl. The P-38 was as well as the P-51. Daryl, by the Korean war they were gone. Now, answer this one. Why was the Corsair such a sucky bird overall and why did the Gyrenes drool when a P-38 past them in flight? Why were there so many ground loops from the F-4U? Time for you to hit the google search engine and the books once again. But make sure you stay inside. It's not safe out in the real world. Daryl, I don't have to hit Google for this because I'm a bit of a warbird buff. The Corsair wasn't a sucky bird at all. It had some problems, yes - The long nose was thought (by the Navy) to be problematic during landings, it had a habit of throwing oil, but it was generally considered a good fighter and considered by many to be the best one in the PTO. Why? Because an air-cooled engine is a lot more rugged when hit by groundfire than a liquid-cooled engine is. hate to bust your bubble but I entered the AF as a Recip Mechanic. It was later on changed to Propulsion Technician. My uniforms weren't green. They were black. The P-38 was the first fighter to be able to disengage anytime it wished. The others didn't have that option. As one Lighting pilot put it, "If I was Jumped from above and didn't like the situation, I just disengaged". If the 38 lost an engine, they found the nearest cloud bank and hid out. Unless you were in one of the pieces of crap that was sold to the British, that is. Now, what was the main difference between the export 38s and the domestic? Comon Hero, let's hear it. They had crappier engines installed in them. BTW what does that have to do with the statement "Because an air-cooled engine is a lot more rugged when hit by groundfire than a liquid-cooled engine is."? BTW are you claiming to have worked on P-38s now? And I trust you know why the P-38s weren't considered a great fighter in ETO and why most of them were shipped off to the PTO don't you? BTW red, he'll just claim that the Air Force History Support Office is full of it... No, just you. So you admit that they were right and that P-38s were withdrawn before the Korean War then? -Tom "For the cause that lacks assistance/The wrong that needs ressistance/For the Future in the distance/And the Good that I can do" - George Linnaeus Banks, "What I Live for" UMA Lemming 404 Local member, 404th MTN(LI) |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:06:14 -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just enough to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the beginning of the Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets, they stated that the buried many of them to get the new jets. You should email these folks to help them set their records straight: Air Force History Support Office Reference and Analysis Branch AFHSO/HOR You do it if it's that important to you. History is written by the winners and we all know that there is only the history that we are fed. Sort of like, "What was the real reason behind the Civil War". History says that it was over slavery (depending on whom you speak to), the North says it was about the Secession of the South. But the South says it was over the one sided economics of the day. It was definately NOT slavery as Lincoln vetoed the Emancipation the first time through. But you keep reading those books and stay inside. First, it wasn't a book but an actual email from someone who has access to that information which red posted which (surprise surprise) showed you to be wrong. Second, "history is written by the winners" doesn't apply here as it's US military history we're talking about and last I checked the US military wasn't fighting itself during WWII. Third, if you're so brain dead as to take someone who *knows* what you're talking about as a bunch of crap it's no wonder you've been laughed at from one end of Usenet to the other. Fourth, why are you trying to change the subject to the Civil War when we're talking about the P-38 and your claim it was still in active service after 1949 when the Air Force itself says you're wrong? Dave -- You can talk about us, but you can't talk without us! US Army Signal Corps!! www.geocities.com/davidcasey98 B Co, 404th Signal Battalion, 404th Infantry Division (Lemming) "We *are* UMA!" |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Daryl Hunt" wrote in message ... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Daryl Hunt" wrote in message ... I can see you are still lying your ass off. Just where did that flight come from? I doubt if I would remember being able to ID anything except, "Plane" in 1949 if even that. Guess Rod Stirling must have been around for that phenonema. And since you didn't post the real McCoy URL or Letter so that it can be followed up on, you are just making things up once again. From http://www.afa.org/magazine/gallery/p-38.asp "The last P-38 was delivered in September 1945, and the type was phased out of service in 1949." Yes. The operative word was Active Duty. Buckley Air Field was Guard up to 2001. Buckley has just recently become and Active Duty AFB in 2001. Your information does coincide with the aholes info. The P-38 was taken out of front line service in 1949. Many were sold to private individuals. 50 were sold to Italy and 12 were ceded to Honduras. Front line usually means Active Regulars. But to make a point, look up the reasons that the P-47, P-51 and the P-38 was shoved into holes during Korea. In order to get the P-80s, they had to get rid of the Prop Jobs. That would place all of them well past 1949. Of course, The P-38's and P-47's were gone by Korea says the AF says and they should know. The F-51's did indeed soldier on. The 51st Fighter Wing of Osan AB, Korea had a few P-38s as in 1950. They were trying to get rid of them as quickly as possible. Lose one and you get a brand new F-80. Didn't take them long. They also had a few P-51s as well. Not according to their unit history, it says they were only at Kimpo in Korea in 1950 and further says they were all P-80 by that time having converted from P-51's in 1948 They onlyP-38's they had were for training when first formed in Jan 1941 http://www.osan.af.mil/Public/51FW/51fw-history.html The 82nd Fighter Wing used the P-38s for Escort Duties as well during Korea before they were replaced. They were inactivated on 9 Sept 1945 as 97 Fighter Squadron, Two Engine They reformed as a P-51 unit on 12 Apr. 1947 and were officially designated 97 Fighter Squadron, Single Engine, on, 15 Aug. 1947 http://www.82ndfightergroup.com/97history.htm There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just enough to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the beginning of the Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets, they stated that the buried many of them to get the new jets. There's plenty of information about F-51 and Corsair service but it doesnt seem likely any P-38's or P-47's served in official roles in Korea. Keith |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daryl Hunt wrote:
The 51st Fighter Wing of Osan AB, Korea had a few P-38s as in 1950. They were trying to get rid of them as quickly as possible. Lose one and you get a brand new F-80. Didn't take them long. They also had a few P-51s as well. The 82nd Fighter Wing used the P-38s for Escort Duties as well during Korea before they were replaced. There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just enough to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the beginning of the Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets, they stated that the buried many of them to get the new jets. Martin Caidin, not that he's necessarily a valid source, stated such in the intro to his book "Fork-Tailed Devil: The P-38". Claimed that orders came down to "dispose" of the Lightnings - but they weren't to be handed to our nominal allies, the South Koreans, so they were bulldozed into a ditch and covered over. (He then maunders about how much those planes would be worth today, yadda yadda yadda.) The implication was that he had witnessed it personally, but again, it was Caidin, so who knows if that was true. -Marc (actually, my bull**** alarm is pinging - he may have been referring to the initial withdrawal of US troops from Korea that led the DPRK to think it'd be safe to invade. I'll have to dig up the book & check.) -- Marc Reeve actual email address after removal of 4s & spaces is c4m4r4a4m4a4n a4t c4r4u4z4i4o d4o4t c4o4m |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc Reeve" wrote in message ... Daryl Hunt wrote: The 51st Fighter Wing of Osan AB, Korea had a few P-38s as in 1950. They were trying to get rid of them as quickly as possible. Lose one and you get a brand new F-80. Didn't take them long. They also had a few P-51s as well. The 82nd Fighter Wing used the P-38s for Escort Duties as well during Korea before they were replaced. There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just enough to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the beginning of the Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets, they stated that the buried many of them to get the new jets. Martin Caidin, not that he's necessarily a valid source, stated such in the intro to his book "Fork-Tailed Devil: The P-38". Claimed that orders came down to "dispose" of the Lightnings - but they weren't to be handed to our nominal allies, the South Koreans, so they were bulldozed into a ditch and covered over. (He then maunders about how much those planes would be worth today, yadda yadda yadda.) The implication was that he had witnessed it personally, but again, it was Caidin, so who knows if that was true. -Marc (actually, my bull**** alarm is pinging - he may have been referring to the initial withdrawal of US troops from Korea that led the DPRK to think it'd be safe to invade. I'll have to dig up the book & check.) -- I suspect he's right BUT that incident happened in 1945 , a lot of other planes got treated the same way right after the war as the units were disbanded and the men shipped home. Keith |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:52:51 +0100, a stranger
called by some "Keith Willshaw" came forth and told this tale in us.military.army The 51st Fighter Wing of Osan AB, Korea had a few P-38s as in 1950. They were trying to get rid of them as quickly as possible. Lose one and you get a brand new F-80. Didn't take them long. They also had a few P-51s as well. Not according to their unit history, it says they were only at Kimpo in Korea in 1950 and further says they were all P-80 by that time having converted from P-51's in 1948 Wait! What are doing confusing Daryl with facts? Don't you know that Daryl was a super-secret special Air Force guy? Who went through Airborne School dunk? And that he's always right even though the United States Air Force says he's wrong? -- Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail WE *ARE* UMA Lemmings 404 Local |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Replacement_Tommel" 'SINVA LIDBABY wrote in message ... hate to bust your bubble but I entered the AF as a Recip Mechanic. It was later on changed to Propulsion Technician. My uniforms weren't green. They were black. The P-38 was the first fighter to be able to disengage anytime it wished. The others didn't have that option. As one Lighting pilot put it, "If I was Jumped from above and didn't like the situation, I just disengaged". If the 38 lost an engine, they found the nearest cloud bank and hid out. Unless you were in one of the pieces of crap that was sold to the British, that is. Now, what was the main difference between the export 38s and the domestic? Comon Hero, let's hear it. They had crappier engines installed in them. BZZTTT, wrong answer. The domestics had counterrotating engines. If you lost and engine, the torgue factor was lessened. The Exports had right turn engines only and were prone to spriral when the Left Engine was lost. BTW what does that have to do with the statement "Because an air-cooled engine is a lot more rugged when hit by groundfire than a liquid-cooled engine is."? BTW are you claiming to have worked on P-38s now? Give your trolling a rest for a bit. And I trust you know why the P-38s weren't considered a great fighter in ETO and why most of them were shipped off to the PTO don't you? Do you? Or are you going to post something by a long since dead author. Newsflash, those are opinions as well. BTW red, he'll just claim that the Air Force History Support Office is full of it... No, just you. So you admit that they were right and that P-38s were withdrawn before the Korean War then? My vision may be failing now but it was fine when I saw the squadron of them overfly the Dairy I was living at at the time. And they were out of Buckley Air Field outside of Denver. In otherwords, Air National Guard. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Front line usually means Active Regulars.
Really...what lines do you think the Air National Guard and the U.S.A.F. Reserve were on when they took part in the Viet Nam War, Gulf War and other hotspots since then. But to make a point, look up the reasons that the P-47, P-51 and the P-38 was shoved into holes during Korea. In order to get the P-80s, they had to get rid of the Prop Jobs. That would place all of them well past 1949. Of course, * You are quite delusional making a statement like this. No one in their right mind would risk a court martial or worse for such an act. It would have certainly taken more than one person to dispose of an aircraft in the manner you are suggesting. How long do think something like this could be kept a secret? The 51st Fighter Wing of Osan AB, Korea had a few P-38s as in 1950. They were trying to get rid of them as quickly as possible. Lose one and you get a brand new F-80. Didn't take them long. They also had a few P-51s as well. * The 51st Fighter Interceptor Wing duty stations: Itazuke Air Base, Japan - September 22nd, 1950 Kimpo Air Base, South Korea (K-14) - October 10th, 1950 Itazuke Air Base, Japan - December 10th, 1950 Tsuiki Air Base, Japan - January 15th, 1951 Suwon Air Base, South Korea (K-13) - October 1st, 1951 through to July 26th, 1954 NOTE: The 51st F.I.W. was redesignated 51st Air Base Wing on the 20th of October, 1971 and activated on the 1st of November, 1970 at Osan Air Base, Republic of Korea. The 51st F.I.W. used the following types of aircraft: Northrop F-61 1948 to 1950 Lockheed F-80 Shooting Star 1948 to 1951 North American F-82 Mustang 1949 to 1950 North American F-86 Sabre 1951 to 1960 Lockheed F-94 Starfire 1954 to 1955 Convair F-102 Delta Dagger 1959 to 1964 I'll leave it at this point. So much for P-38's, which incidentally in 1948 were redesignated F-38. And the same for P-51 (F-51) Mustangs and the P-47 (F-47) Thunderbolts. The 82nd Fighter Wing used the P-38s for Escort Duties as well during Korea before they were replaced. * More Grade 'A' bull****. The 82nd Fighter Wing was established on the 28th of July, 1947. It was organized on the 15th of August, 1947. The wing was discontinued on the 1st of August, 1948. It was activated on the the same day. On the 2nd of October, 1949 it was inactivated. On the 22nd of June, 1972 it was redesignated the 82nd Flying Wing and subsequently activated on the 1st of February, 1973. * The 82nd Fighter Wing was assigned to Strategic Air Command. Duty stations included: Grenier Field, New Hampshire - August 15th, 1947 to 1st of August, 1948 Grenier Air Force Base, New Hampshire - 1st of August, 1948 to 2nd of October, 1949. Williams Air Force Base, Arizona - 1st of February, 1973 * The 82nd Fighter Wing operated the following types of aircraft: North American P-51D Mustang 1947-1948 North American F-51D Mustang 1948-1949 There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just enough to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the beginning of the Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets, they stated that the buried many of them to get the new jets. * Have you been hearing strange voices again!!!!!!!!!! Cheers...Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |