A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NTSB prelim report out



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 8th 06, 09:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 80
Default NTSB prelim report out

http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...06X01297&key=2

For you amateur FAR lawyers to chew on:

"The glider was equipped with a panel mounted communication radio,
global positioning system (GPS) unit, and a transponder; however, the
pilot did not turn on the GPS and transponder. The transponder's
activation is not required for glider operations (for more details see
14 CFR Part 91.215). According to the glider pilot, he did not turn on
the transponder because he was only intending on remaining in the local
glider area, and because he wanted to reserve his batteries for radio
use. The glider was equipped with two batteries (one main and one
spare), however, due to the previous glider flights, the pilot was
unsure of the remaining charge in the battery."

  #2  
Old September 9th 06, 12:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ramy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default NTSB prelim report out

Very lucky pilot, both in the air and on the ground, if he gets away
with it...


wrote:
http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...06X01297&key=2

For you amateur FAR lawyers to chew on:

"The glider was equipped with a panel mounted communication radio,
global positioning system (GPS) unit, and a transponder; however, the
pilot did not turn on the GPS and transponder. The transponder's
activation is not required for glider operations (for more details see
14 CFR Part 91.215). According to the glider pilot, he did not turn on
the transponder because he was only intending on remaining in the local
glider area, and because he wanted to reserve his batteries for radio
use. The glider was equipped with two batteries (one main and one
spare), however, due to the previous glider flights, the pilot was
unsure of the remaining charge in the battery."


  #3  
Old September 9th 06, 12:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Greg Arnold
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 251
Default NTSB prelim report out

An interesting statement from the report:

"The transponder's activation is not required for glider operations (for
more details see 14 CFR Part 91.215)."


Ramy wrote:
Very lucky pilot, both in the air and on the ground, if he gets away
with it...


wrote:
http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...06X01297&key=2

For you amateur FAR lawyers to chew on:

"The glider was equipped with a panel mounted communication radio,
global positioning system (GPS) unit, and a transponder; however, the
pilot did not turn on the GPS and transponder. The transponder's
activation is not required for glider operations (for more details see
14 CFR Part 91.215). According to the glider pilot, he did not turn on
the transponder because he was only intending on remaining in the local
glider area, and because he wanted to reserve his batteries for radio
use. The glider was equipped with two batteries (one main and one
spare), however, due to the previous glider flights, the pilot was
unsure of the remaining charge in the battery."


  #4  
Old September 9th 06, 12:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike the Strike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 952
Default NTSB prelim report out

Reminds me of an old instructor who told me that instruments that were
not working were as useful as runway behind you!

So if the glider had its transponder turned on, the TCAS on the jet
would likely have alerted the Hawker pilots in time to avoid the
collision?

Mike


"The glider was equipped with a panel mounted communication radio,
global positioning system (GPS) unit, and a transponder; however, the
pilot did not turn on the GPS and transponder. The transponder's
activation is not required for glider operations (for more details see
14 CFR Part 91.215). According to the glider pilot, he did not turn on
the transponder because he was only intending on remaining in the local
glider area, and because he wanted to reserve his batteries for radio
use. The glider was equipped with two batteries (one main and one
spare), however, due to the previous glider flights, the pilot was
unsure of the remaining charge in the battery."


  #5  
Old September 9th 06, 02:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Terry[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default NTSB prelim report out


Mike the Strike wrote:
Reminds me of an old instructor who told me that instruments that were
not working were as useful as runway behind you!

So if the glider had its transponder turned on, the TCAS on the jet
would likely have alerted the Hawker pilots in time to avoid the
collision?

Mike

================================================== =========

Has it been established that the Hawker had TCAS? and if it did, what
type configuration?

I have flown airliners with a scalable display which shows all targets
up to 40 NM around the aircraft. Other airliners have a much more
modest display. Given the smaller panel space in a bizjet, the modest
display would be the best to hope for. If you know how TCAS works, then
I appologize if I offend:

TCAS II has a two level threat warning area. The first area, which is
largest forward of the airplane will generate an audible "TRAFFIC,
TRAFFIC" at this time, the display I am familiar with would should the
target as an amber where previous it was a white on black diamond with
relative altitude displayed. If the target's and the unit's flight path
are projected to enter the inner threat area, a resolution advisory
(RA) is given to the pilots. At the RA level, the vertical speed
indicator will have red arcs for rate of climb/descent to not do and
green arcs to fly towards. The announciation will say: "CLIMB, CLIMB,"
or "CLIMB NOW" for added urgency. Insert "DESCEND" for alternate
scenarios. At completion of the confict, the TCAS will announce:
"MONITOR VERTICAL SPEED" and "CLEAR OF CONFLICT."

Pilots are free to deviate from ATC clearance when an RA is received.
Had the transponder been operating on the glider with correct mode C
indications and the bizjet had TCAS II installed and operating, the
bizjet pilot would have heard the "TRAFFIC, TRAFFIC" and likely
"MONITOR VERTICAL SPEED" with some change required in their descent
rate.

Would the transponder have prevented this? Yes, if the glider had a
correctly functioning mode C transponder and the bizjet had a TCAS
system selected on and the bizjet pilots promptly followed any RA. A
lot of ifs there.

I don't beleive that transponders are the magic sheild that some do.
There are far too many airplanes that do not have this installed.

  #6  
Old September 9th 06, 02:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike Schumann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 539
Default NTSB prelim report out

Transponders won't protect you from most VFR traffic, but they will protect
you from IFR traffic, thanks to not only TCAS, but also the ability of ATC
to see you and keep the traffic away from you.

Mike Schumann

"Terry" wrote in message
ups.com...

Mike the Strike wrote:
Reminds me of an old instructor who told me that instruments that were
not working were as useful as runway behind you!

So if the glider had its transponder turned on, the TCAS on the jet
would likely have alerted the Hawker pilots in time to avoid the
collision?

Mike

================================================== =========

Has it been established that the Hawker had TCAS? and if it did, what
type configuration?

I have flown airliners with a scalable display which shows all targets
up to 40 NM around the aircraft. Other airliners have a much more
modest display. Given the smaller panel space in a bizjet, the modest
display would be the best to hope for. If you know how TCAS works, then
I appologize if I offend:

TCAS II has a two level threat warning area. The first area, which is
largest forward of the airplane will generate an audible "TRAFFIC,
TRAFFIC" at this time, the display I am familiar with would should the
target as an amber where previous it was a white on black diamond with
relative altitude displayed. If the target's and the unit's flight path
are projected to enter the inner threat area, a resolution advisory
(RA) is given to the pilots. At the RA level, the vertical speed
indicator will have red arcs for rate of climb/descent to not do and
green arcs to fly towards. The announciation will say: "CLIMB, CLIMB,"
or "CLIMB NOW" for added urgency. Insert "DESCEND" for alternate
scenarios. At completion of the confict, the TCAS will announce:
"MONITOR VERTICAL SPEED" and "CLEAR OF CONFLICT."

Pilots are free to deviate from ATC clearance when an RA is received.
Had the transponder been operating on the glider with correct mode C
indications and the bizjet had TCAS II installed and operating, the
bizjet pilot would have heard the "TRAFFIC, TRAFFIC" and likely
"MONITOR VERTICAL SPEED" with some change required in their descent
rate.

Would the transponder have prevented this? Yes, if the glider had a
correctly functioning mode C transponder and the bizjet had a TCAS
system selected on and the bizjet pilots promptly followed any RA. A
lot of ifs there.

I don't beleive that transponders are the magic sheild that some do.
There are far too many airplanes that do not have this installed.



  #7  
Old September 9th 06, 03:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default NTSB prelim report out

Would the transponder have prevented this? Yes, if the glider had a
correctly functioning mode C transponder and the bizjet had a TCAS
system selected on and the bizjet pilots promptly followed any RA. A
lot of ifs there.


With a BizJet, Turboprop or Airliner with TCAS? Maybe.. or at least given
the pilots a heads up they were not alone and put the eyes into a quadrant
of airspace or a blind reaction to RA warnings.

If it had been a smaller, non jet with no TCAS capability?.. NO.. No chance
at all for a warning.
If the non TCAS equiped airplane was talking to ATC, where ATC "might" have
been able to issue a traffic warning? Maybe

Is TIS service from Reno Approach available in that area? A transponder
"might" have made a difference in a TIS service area IF the airplane had a
TIS display capability.


I don't beleive that transponders are the magic sheild that some do.
There are far too many airplanes that do not have this installed.


I agree, a Transponder is not a force field to keep threats away, and a lot
of people cruise just below Class A airspace so they don't need ATC
assistance or have to deal with IFR clearances.

BT


  #8  
Old September 9th 06, 03:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default NTSB prelim report out

I believe the glider pilot was from Japan. May be time for a hasty
retreat back to the homeland.

  #9  
Old September 9th 06, 04:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default NTSB prelim report out


"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:vDpMg.3357$8J2.3041@fed1read11...

I agree, a Transponder is not a force field to keep threats away, and a
lot of people cruise just below Class A airspace so they don't need ATC
assistance or have to deal with IFR clearances.

BT

Funny, I used to fly IFR just so I didn't have to deal with all that VFR
crap.

Bill Daniels


  #10  
Old September 9th 06, 08:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Cats
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 164
Default NTSB prelim report out


Terry wrote:
snip

Would the transponder have prevented this? Yes, if the glider had a
correctly functioning mode C transponder and the bizjet had a TCAS
system selected on and the bizjet pilots promptly followed any RA. A
lot of ifs there.


From the report:


"The Hawker 800XP was equipped with a TCAS warning system."

It says the glider had a transponder but not if it was mode C. So, we
know that the Bizjet had the equipment - if I was the glider pilot and
lost my plane due to not turning on some kit I have, I would be sick,
sick sick.



I don't beleive that transponders are the magic sheild that some do.
There are far too many airplanes that do not have this installed.


*nothing* is a magic shield, but when one has the kit not using will
look like madness to many observers. Radar doesn't prevent all
collisions at sea, not all vessels are equipped with it, and there are
problems spotting small sailing vessels - but no-one suggests it should
be turned off.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
18 Oct 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 October 19th 05 02:19 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.