If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:bnzLb.6520$8H.20195@attbi_s03...
"Dave S" wrote in message . net... Now... a question about realities.. The POH nazi's will say that the Word as written is good, praise be to the POH... if I base flight decisions and speeds on MY calculated numbers rather than the max weight sea level standard day numbers published in the almighty POH.. am I going to be asking for trouble here? It depends on what you mean by 'trouble'. The laws of physics prevail over the POH in determining whether your engine mount will break... Why do folks worry about engine mounts breaking? They are far stronger, in most cases, than the rest of the structure. For production airplanes, the legal standards for certification include a 9G strength for fuselage/cabin structure for crashworthiness, and I have seen other specs calling for the same 9Gs specifically on engine mounts. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Druine Turbulent | Stealth Pilot | Home Built | 0 | August 30th 04 05:05 PM |
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 70 | January 11th 04 08:35 PM |