If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran
Mike Weeks is an evil individual...
....yet he has taken an extremely bad poker hand and played it as best he could(USS Liberty murders...GOI story stunk to high heaven right from get-go...gets stinkier and stinkier when you even begin to scratch the surface) |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive'build-up for war with Iran
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran
Defendario wrote: IsReeL stinks. It needs wiped from the pages of history, like Mahmoud says. That;s another stupid and bigoted comment you've made about the Jews - are you an anti-semite? It's amazing the amount of stupid comments made in this thread so far. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran
Mike... 1)hyperlink me to where Ambassador Richard Parker completely discredited Greg Reight in 1997 2)http://hometown.aol.com/libertyincident/JEJMpage4.html Mike .... a)is the bombed out Egyptian planes photo doctored like the IDF Gun Camera Photo in the IDF History Report of 1982? b)..is it like the doctored Thames/ Cristol gun camera photo provided by the Government of Israel to Cristol on p.79 of "The Liberty Incident" This is a serious issue, Mike.... I'm looking at LIFE Magazine Vol62...June 16, 1967 page 38D....did LIFE crop the photo also,Mike? 3)With Israel now being caught TWICE in doctoring Gun Camera Photos...can we assume Reight is now telling the truth that Israel had no photo recon aircraft units in 1967??? What reason would Reight have to lie at this late date? |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran
Mike... 1)hyperlink me to where Ambassador Richard Parker completely discredited Greg Reight in 1997 2)http://hometown.aol.com/libertyincident/JEJMpage4.html Mike .... a)is the bombed out Egyptian planes photo doctored like the IDF Gun Camera Photo in the IDF History Report of 1982? b)..is it like the doctored Thames/ Cristol gun camera photo provided by the Government of Israel to Cristol on p.79 of "The Liberty Incident" This is a serious issue, Mike.... I'm looking at LIFE Magazine Vol62...June 16, 1967 page 38D....did LIFE crop the photo also,Mike? 3)With Israel now being caught TWICE in doctoring Gun Camera Photos...can we assume Reight is now telling the truth that Israel had no photo recon aircraft units in 1967??? What reason would Reight have to lie at this late date? |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran
Mike ...you stated the Reight phot had been cropped to eliminate the
shadow of the Delta-winged Mirage...where did Reight produce such a cropped photo? That is a serious charge....Where did Ambassador Parker completely discredit Reight in 1967. Is the Delta-Winged Mirage Photo at the same angle as the 6/16/1967 LIFE Magazine photo on page 38D???? Is this another example of doctoring? Could the IDF have realized their mistake in giving LIFE Magazine photo recon pictures and sent an overflight on a different date than 6/5/1967... ....Again, are those two photos at the same angle???.... This is where the West Bank land was grabbed, Mike...it would have serious geo-politial implications in the UN Security Council if there was photographic proof that the US and UK assisted in a land grab.... ...as opposed to "defending a state surrounded by neighbors bent on its destruction". Mike...seize the opportunity to turn back from your wicked, wicked ways and join me in turning the "senseless slaughter" of those 34 into some kind of "meaningful sacrifice". 1)Is this another example of doctoring? 2)Are those two photos at the same angle???.... http://hometown.aol.com/libertyincident/JEJMpage4.html versus The photo in LIFE Magazine Vol62...June 16, 1967 page 38D.... 3)and please,hyperlink me to where Ambassador Richard Parker completely discredited Greg Reight in 1997... 4)Was "dead in the water" filmed in 1997? Hyperlink me to the date/publication where Greg Reight first made his claims and produced the supposedly cropped photo |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive'build-up for war with Iran
William Black wrote:
As usual some thought provoking and interesing materal, which can best be found by SNIPS OF MUCH FOOLISH CHEST THUMPING BY BOTH "DEFENDARIO" AND "DARN GOOD INTELLIGENCE" After a nuclear attack on Iran Russia and China would almost certainly start a campaign to marginalise the US internationally, and they'd get a lot of support. I don't know if you noticed but the US isn't that popular at the moment. Ports all over the world would close to US shipping, attacks on US embassies and tourists and US owned industrial plants. Along with international boycots of US products plus China would dump all those dollars. Dump them where? The only "victim" of a Russian or Chinese led "boycott" of the US or attempt to marginalize would be the comlete implosion of the PRC's economy, and the subsequent melt down of the domestic authority of the PRC government. How does the old line go, " If ypu owe the bank a mllion bucks ad ca't pay ou are in trouble. If youowe the bak a illion bucks and can't pay, the bank is in trouble." The PC economy, and the PRC work force, can not risk edangering their American markets. World War III or a huge US depression... Your choice... |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive'build-up for war with Iran
Darn Good Intelligence wrote:
William Black wrote: "Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message groups.com... So you think that Russia and China would intervene on the behalf of the Iranian lunatics? I don't think they'd dare. Would you bet your life? Yes. The Russians and Chinese would kick up a big fuss if the U.S attacks Iran but they wouldn't use military means to stop the U.S. That would be WW3. So what would the US attacking Iran be? There has to be a time when the bullying has to be stopped. The action advocated against Iran just means that states that previously felt a degree of security suddenly feel more threatened - and it's not by Iran, China or Russia! Ricardo -- "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand Ignorance and prejudice, and fear, walk hand in hand ..." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nations sending Iran to Security Council (for Israel via the US, of course!): | NOMOREWARFORISRAEL | Naval Aviation | 1 | July 13th 06 05:05 AM |
Bush administration finalizes military attack on Iran | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 11 | January 5th 06 09:38 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |