A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Thermals and Horsepower



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 8th 05, 06:51 PM
Ken Kochanski (KK)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thermals and Horsepower

One horsepower is defined as lifting 550 pounds one foot in one second.


So, if were climbing at an average of 300 FPM (5 fps)in a two place
ship weighing 1100 pounds ... can we say we are
extracting/consuming/obtaining 10 HP from the thermal ...

KK

  #2  
Old January 8th 05, 07:05 PM
Stewart Kissel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ok, I'll bite...

Would it be the same amount of horsepower if spread
over a two-place ship's wing-span...as it would if
the 1100lbs was a lead weight?



At 18:30 08 January 2005, Ken Kochanski Kk wrote:
One horsepower is defined as lifting 550 pounds one
foot in one second.


So, if were climbing at an average of 300 FPM (5 fps)in
a two place
ship weighing 1100 pounds ... can we say we are
extracting/consuming/obtaining 10 HP from the thermal
...

KK





  #3  
Old January 8th 05, 07:09 PM
Ken Kochanski (KK)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm not an engineer, but I don't think it makes a diference.

I think HP is just a measure of work ... like weight lifted x distance
in y seconds as defined.


Stewart Kissel wrote:
Ok, I'll bite...

Would it be the same amount of horsepower if spread
over a two-place ship's wing-span...as it would if
the 1100lbs was a lead weight?



At 18:30 08 January 2005, Ken Kochanski Kk wrote:
One horsepower is defined as lifting 550 pounds one
foot in one second.


So, if were climbing at an average of 300 FPM (5 fps)in
a two place
ship weighing 1100 pounds ... can we say we are
extracting/consuming/obtaining 10 HP from the thermal
...

KK



  #4  
Old January 8th 05, 07:12 PM
Bob Salvo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Ken,

I think it's more like 14 HP, when a sink rate of 2 fps is included.

BTW, have you noticed when a large gaggle leaves the thermal, the thermal
gets stronger?

Bob

"Ken Kochanski (KK)" wrote in message
oups.com...
One horsepower is defined as lifting 550 pounds one foot in one second.


So, if were climbing at an average of 300 FPM (5 fps)in a two place
ship weighing 1100 pounds ... can we say we are
extracting/consuming/obtaining 10 HP from the thermal ...

KK



  #5  
Old January 8th 05, 07:31 PM
Ken Kochanski (KK)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have noticed them get weaker as ships enter ... i.e. when we just
find a weak thermal to save our butts and the gaggle then comes over
and squashes it. :-)


Bob Salvo wrote:
Hi Ken,

I think it's more like 14 HP, when a sink rate of 2 fps is included.

BTW, have you noticed when a large gaggle leaves the thermal, the

thermal
gets stronger?

Bob

"Ken Kochanski (KK)" wrote in message
oups.com...
One horsepower is defined as lifting 550 pounds one foot in one

second.


So, if were climbing at an average of 300 FPM (5 fps)in a two place
ship weighing 1100 pounds ... can we say we are
extracting/consuming/obtaining 10 HP from the thermal ...

KK


  #6  
Old January 8th 05, 07:31 PM
Ken Kochanski (KK)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have noticed them get weaker as ships enter ... i.e. when we just
find a weak thermal to save our butts and the gaggle then comes over
and squashes it. :-)


Bob Salvo wrote:
Hi Ken,

I think it's more like 14 HP, when a sink rate of 2 fps is included.

BTW, have you noticed when a large gaggle leaves the thermal, the

thermal
gets stronger?

Bob

"Ken Kochanski (KK)" wrote in message
oups.com...
One horsepower is defined as lifting 550 pounds one foot in one

second.


So, if were climbing at an average of 300 FPM (5 fps)in a two place
ship weighing 1100 pounds ... can we say we are
extracting/consuming/obtaining 10 HP from the thermal ...

KK


  #7  
Old January 8th 05, 07:31 PM
Ken Kochanski (KK)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have noticed them get weaker as ships enter ... i.e. when we just
find a weak thermal to save our butts and the gaggle then comes over
and squashes it. :-)


Bob Salvo wrote:
Hi Ken,

I think it's more like 14 HP, when a sink rate of 2 fps is included.

BTW, have you noticed when a large gaggle leaves the thermal, the

thermal
gets stronger?

Bob

"Ken Kochanski (KK)" wrote in message
oups.com...
One horsepower is defined as lifting 550 pounds one foot in one

second.


So, if were climbing at an average of 300 FPM (5 fps)in a two place
ship weighing 1100 pounds ... can we say we are
extracting/consuming/obtaining 10 HP from the thermal ...

KK


  #8  
Old January 8th 05, 11:05 PM
CV
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ken Kochanski (KK) wrote:
I'm not an engineer, but I don't think it makes a diference.

I think HP is just a measure of work ... like weight lifted x distance
in y seconds as defined.


Not quite:
- Weight lifted x distance is "work". The amount of work
is the same, regardless how long it takes to do the lifting.
- When you introduce the time element: work per time unit,
that is called "power".
HP is a unit for measuring power.
CV
  #9  
Old January 9th 05, 12:45 AM
Ken Kochanski (KK)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OK ... I have been trying to understand this better as someone recently
asked about the energy we used to soar ... I could explain how we
thermaled and how we converted altitude for distance, etc., but
couldn't convert that into some statement about horsepower or watts,
etc. So, looking at it another way ... if we have to climb, let's say
30,000' to get around a task ... how do you describe the total energy
involved ... both as a potential ... and also as a reflection of energy
expended if you lets say burn off 30K feet at an average speed of 60
mph in 2 hours.

KK
Running On Entropy (or something else ...)



CV wrote:
Ken Kochanski (KK) wrote:
I'm not an engineer, but I don't think it makes a diference.

I think HP is just a measure of work ... like weight lifted x

distance
in y seconds as defined.


Not quite:
- Weight lifted x distance is "work". The amount of work
is the same, regardless how long it takes to do the lifting.
- When you introduce the time element: work per time unit,
that is called "power".
HP is a unit for measuring power.
CV


  #10  
Old January 9th 05, 12:54 AM
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:51:14 UTC, "Ken Kochanski (KK)"
wrote:

: So, if were climbing at an average of 300 FPM (5 fps)in a two place
: ship weighing 1100 pounds ... can we say we are
: extracting/consuming/obtaining 10 HP from the thermal ...

Gordon bennet. Who does calculations in these barbaric units?

1100lb = 500kg - 5kN

5fps = 1.5m/s

5kN * 1.5m/s =7.5kW = 10hp

OK, more or less!

Ian


--

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.