If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
stall recognition and recovery
Andy, thanks for posting these.
I read the NTSB report and was bewildered ... how could such otherwise competent pilots perform so recklessly? Mostly I want to know if there's something I can glean from it for my own flying. There was probably a two-person instance of crowd behavior at play (comment, BB?), but the way I talk to myself in the cockpit, I don't feel immune. 2NO |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
stall recognition and recovery
On Feb 19, 6:20*pm, Ramy wrote:
On Feb 19, 4:43*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Feb 19, 12:02*pm, Ramy wrote: On Feb 19, 7:44*am, Andy wrote: The following references are provided, without my comment, for those interested in the subject of stall recognition and recovery. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1234...?mod=djemalert... reports on the referenced fatal accident: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...05MA003&rpt=fa http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2007/AAR0701.pdf Andy I simply don't buy it. How any pilot with even basic experience, not to mention thousands of hours, will react to a stall warning by pulling on the stick/yoke?? and "pitched up to a 31-degree angle" ?? It's not like they were so close to the ground that they had to pullup to clear it. As usual, the NTSB rather put the blame on the pilots... Ramy What you think the pilots should not be blamed becasue they could not possibly be so incompetent to conduct the amazing list of bad decisions and errors that made? That's an interesting defense. Well if that accident chain does not deserve to be blamed on the pilots I don't know what does. Lets see, lets climb the sucker to FL410, with the AP in rate mode so is really slow when we get there, lets not monitor airspeed during this (even though we know are pushing the envelope). Lets not follow engine failure checklists properly, lets not pitch over and correctly do a windmills start, etc. (I can't recall if it as established how much they knew about core lock if at all, but they failed to execute basic restart procedure). Lets not declare our emergency and try to cover up for a while hoping we can get ourselves out of this hole. Lets not fly the sucker when all else goes wrong and maintain glide to any of several airports etc. etc. etc. This flight crew deserved evey bit of cricism they got. Some aspects of training programs and the core lock on the GE engines etc. need to be addressed but are very distant factors in my opinion. And dude if that does ### convince you these folks were an accident waiting to happen read ### cockpit transcript. Dude. Most commentators came down hard on the pilots as well, including several magazine articles. There are multiple fatal accidents where things as "simple" as misunderstanding stick shaker/pusher vs. Mach buffeting, obstructed pitot/static systems (and fighting the stick pusher thinking it was Mach induced, etc. etc.). However none of those are even close to *the chain of events this flight crew managed to accomplish. Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't think we are talking about the same accidents Darryl. I was referring to the recent one in the article. And I don't say pilots should not be blamed for many possible mistakes they do. All I say is that I don't buy the claim that experience pilot purposely pulled the yoke and piched up to 31 degree angle without recognizing he is stalling the aircraft. Unless I missread the article this is a complete BS. Ramy I am sure we can all think of cases where we read "pilot error" and know that it is wrong finger pointing. However your reverse argument that people should not blame pilots because they could not pull back/ pitch up an aircraft into a deep stall or fail to recover from a stall is fanciful. And I'm not judging anything to do with the current accident, just saying there is no way to say pilots would not do something just because you think an experienced pilot would not do it. While I misunderstood what accident you were referring to there are enough concerning things circulating already about the recent accident - enough to guarantee I'll read the report carefully. But I would not rush to jump to conclusions either way. In the following accidents forget the flight crew's involvement in arriving at the point bad things happen, but their efforts to do just what you say an experienced crew would not do is what I'm pointing out... 1974 B727 fatal crash, crew screwed up checklists and left pitot anti- ice off and then mistook what was happening as they climbed with a blocked pitot, even though they noted things looked strange and fought the stick pusher all the way into a deep stall. Oh they had the nose up 25 degrees higher than it should be... http://flyingsc.com/learn/res/impossible_climb.html 1972 BEA Trident Heathrow. The crew deactivated the stick pusher after first incorrectly retracting the wing LE droop, and stalled. Lots of possible contributing factors but it is hard to argue this was not pilot error in how they handled the stall (may have been complicated by the possible medical condition of the pilot). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British...ays_Flight_548 and http://www.super70s.com/super70s/Tec...8(Trident).asp There are others out there, including likely cases of mishandling of stall or mach tuck when autopilots either automatically or manually disconnect and pilots are suddenly faced with unexpected control forces. Is that mach tuck or stick push? Is that mach buffer or stall buffet/stick shaker? Do I push or pull? You should also appreciate how detatched from the reality of what was happening to their aircraft that the two pilots who screwed up at FL 410 were. They stalled. What made it so amazing was all the other stuff they did wrong. However even with obvious blame on the crew I thought the NTSB did a good job highlighting training deficiencies - especially issue with doing simulator stall training only at relatively low altitude and not letting them go though to full stick pusher stage - which may confuse a crew if the stick pusher does activate. (which kind of mirrors my concern about the need for full on spin training in GA aircraft and gliders. I think it is unforgivable to just teach recovery from an the very earliest incipient stall and pilots should be exposed to deep stalls and spins and their recovery (and yes I know the irony is some people will die in spin training)). Darryl |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
stall recognition and recovery
On Feb 19, 9:46*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Feb 19, 6:20*pm, Ramy wrote: On Feb 19, 4:43*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Feb 19, 12:02*pm, Ramy wrote: On Feb 19, 7:44*am, Andy wrote: The following references are provided, without my comment, for those interested in the subject of stall recognition and recovery. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1234...?mod=djemalert... reports on the referenced fatal accident: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...05MA003&rpt=fa http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2007/AAR0701.pdf Andy I simply don't buy it. How any pilot with even basic experience, not to mention thousands of hours, will react to a stall warning by pulling on the stick/yoke?? and "pitched up to a 31-degree angle" ?? It's not like they were so close to the ground that they had to pullup to clear it. As usual, the NTSB rather put the blame on the pilots.... Ramy What you think the pilots should not be blamed becasue they could not possibly be so incompetent to conduct the amazing list of bad decisions and errors that made? That's an interesting defense. Well if that accident chain does not deserve to be blamed on the pilots I don't know what does. Lets see, lets climb the sucker to FL410, with the AP in rate mode so is really slow when we get there, lets not monitor airspeed during this (even though we know are pushing the envelope). Lets not follow engine failure checklists properly, lets not pitch over and correctly do a windmills start, etc. (I can't recall if it as established how much they knew about core lock if at all, but they failed to execute basic restart procedure). Lets not declare our emergency and try to cover up for a while hoping we can get ourselves out of this hole. Lets not fly the sucker when all else goes wrong and maintain glide to any of several airports etc. etc. etc. This flight crew deserved evey bit of cricism they got. Some aspects of training programs and the core lock on the GE engines etc. need to be addressed but are very distant factors in my opinion. And dude if that does ### convince you these folks were an accident waiting to happen read ### cockpit transcript. Dude. Most commentators came down hard on the pilots as well, including several magazine articles. There are multiple fatal accidents where things as "simple" as misunderstanding stick shaker/pusher vs. Mach buffeting, obstructed pitot/static systems (and fighting the stick pusher thinking it was Mach induced, etc. etc.). However none of those are even close to *the chain of events this flight crew managed to accomplish. Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't think we are talking about the same accidents Darryl. I was referring to the recent one in the article. And I don't say pilots should not be blamed for many possible mistakes they do. All I say is that I don't buy the claim that experience pilot purposely pulled the yoke and piched up to 31 degree angle without recognizing he is stalling the aircraft. Unless I missread the article this is a complete BS. Ramy I am sure we can all think of cases where we read "pilot error" and know that it is wrong finger pointing. However your reverse argument that people should not blame pilots because they could not pull back/ pitch up an aircraft into a deep stall or fail to recover from a stall is fanciful. And I'm not judging anything to do with the current accident, just saying there is no way to say pilots would not do something just because you think an experienced pilot would not do it. While I misunderstood what accident you were referring to there are enough concerning things circulating already about the recent accident - enough to guarantee I'll read the report carefully. But I would not rush to jump to conclusions either way. In the following accidents forget the flight crew's involvement in arriving at the point bad things happen, but their efforts to do just what you say an experienced crew would not do is what I'm pointing out... 1974 B727 fatal crash, crew screwed up checklists and left pitot anti- ice off and then mistook what was happening as they climbed with a blocked pitot, even though they noted things looked strange and fought the stick pusher all the way into a deep stall. Oh they had the nose up 25 degrees higher than it should be... http://flyingsc.com/learn/res/impossible_climb.html 1972 BEA Trident Heathrow. The crew deactivated the stick pusher after first incorrectly retracting the wing LE droop, and stalled. Lots of possible contributing factors but it is hard to argue this was not pilot error in how they handled the stall (may have been complicated by the possible medical condition of the pilot). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British...ays_Flight_548 andhttp://www.super70s.com/super70s/Tech/Aviation/Disasters/72-06-18(Tri.... There are others out there, including likely cases of mishandling of stall or mach tuck when autopilots either automatically or manually disconnect and pilots are suddenly faced with unexpected control forces. Is that mach tuck or stick push? Is that mach buffer or stall buffet/stick shaker? Do I push or pull? You should also appreciate how detatched from the reality of what was happening to their aircraft that the two pilots who screwed up at FL 410 were. They stalled. What made it so amazing was all the other stuff they did wrong. However even with obvious blame on the crew I thought the NTSB did a good job highlighting training deficiencies - especially issue with doing simulator stall training only at relatively low altitude and not letting them go though to full stick pusher stage - which may confuse a crew if the stick pusher does activate. (which kind of mirrors my concern about the need for full on spin training in GA aircraft and gliders. I think it is unforgivable to just teach recovery from an the very earliest incipient stall and pilots should be exposed to deep stalls and spins and their recovery (and yes I know the irony is some people will die in spin training)). Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for the eye openning links. Makes me wanting to replace my airline tickets with a cruise... Interesting to learn that blocked pitot may cause higher reading. I always expected it to show lower reading. I am wondering if this is true for gliders ASI as well. Ramy |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
stall recognition and recovery
On Feb 20, 1:58*am, wrote:
On Feb 19, 9:46*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Feb 19, 6:20*pm, Ramy wrote: On Feb 19, 4:43*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Feb 19, 12:02*pm, Ramy wrote: On Feb 19, 7:44*am, Andy wrote: The following references are provided, without my comment, for those interested in the subject of stall recognition and recovery. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1234...?mod=djemalert... reports on the referenced fatal accident: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...05MA003&rpt=fa http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2007/AAR0701.pdf Andy I simply don't buy it. How any pilot with even basic experience, not to mention thousands of hours, will react to a stall warning by pulling on the stick/yoke?? and "pitched up to a 31-degree angle" ?? It's not like they were so close to the ground that they had to pullup to clear it. As usual, the NTSB rather put the blame on the pilots... Ramy What you think the pilots should not be blamed becasue they could not possibly be so incompetent to conduct the amazing list of bad decisions and errors that made? That's an interesting defense. Well if that accident chain does not deserve to be blamed on the pilots I don't know what does. Lets see, lets climb the sucker to FL410, with the AP in rate mode so is really slow when we get there, lets not monitor airspeed during this (even though we know are pushing the envelope). Lets not follow engine failure checklists properly, lets not pitch over and correctly do a windmills start, etc. (I can't recall if it as established how much they knew about core lock if at all, but they failed to execute basic restart procedure). Lets not declare our emergency and try to cover up for a while hoping we can get ourselves out of this hole. Lets not fly the sucker when all else goes wrong and maintain glide to any of several airports etc. etc. etc. This flight crew deserved evey bit of cricism they got. Some aspects of training programs and the core lock on the GE engines etc. need to be addressed but are very distant factors in my opinion. And dude if that does ### convince you these folks were an accident waiting to happen read ### cockpit transcript. Dude. Most commentators came down hard on the pilots as well, including several magazine articles. There are multiple fatal accidents where things as "simple" as misunderstanding stick shaker/pusher vs. Mach buffeting, obstructed pitot/static systems (and fighting the stick pusher thinking it was Mach induced, etc. etc.). However none of those are even close to *the chain of events this flight crew managed to accomplish. Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't think we are talking about the same accidents Darryl. I was referring to the recent one in the article. And I don't say pilots should not be blamed for many possible mistakes they do. All I say is that I don't buy the claim that experience pilot purposely pulled the yoke and piched up to 31 degree angle without recognizing he is stalling the aircraft. Unless I missread the article this is a complete BS. Ramy I am sure we can all think of cases where we read "pilot error" and know that it is wrong finger pointing. However your reverse argument that people should not blame pilots because they could not pull back/ pitch up an aircraft into a deep stall or fail to recover from a stall is fanciful. And I'm not judging anything to do with the current accident, just saying there is no way to say pilots would not do something just because you think an experienced pilot would not do it. While I misunderstood what accident you were referring to there are enough concerning things circulating already about the recent accident - enough to guarantee I'll read the report carefully. But I would not rush to jump to conclusions either way. In the following accidents forget the flight crew's involvement in arriving at the point bad things happen, but their efforts to do just what you say an experienced crew would not do is what I'm pointing out... 1974 B727 fatal crash, crew screwed up checklists and left pitot anti- ice off and then mistook what was happening as they climbed with a blocked pitot, even though they noted things looked strange and fought the stick pusher all the way into a deep stall. Oh they had the nose up 25 degrees higher than it should be... http://flyingsc.com/learn/res/impossible_climb.html 1972 BEA Trident Heathrow. The crew deactivated the stick pusher after first incorrectly retracting the wing LE droop, and stalled. Lots of possible contributing factors but it is hard to argue this was not pilot error in how they handled the stall (may have been complicated by the possible medical condition of the pilot). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British...ays_Flight_548 andhttp://www.super70s.com/super70s/Tech/Aviation/Disasters/72-06-18(Tri... There are others out there, including likely cases of mishandling of stall or mach tuck when autopilots either automatically or manually disconnect and pilots are suddenly faced with unexpected control forces. Is that mach tuck or stick push? Is that mach buffer or stall buffet/stick shaker? Do I push or pull? You should also appreciate how detatched from the reality of what was happening to their aircraft that the two pilots who screwed up at FL 410 were. They stalled. What made it so amazing was all the other stuff they did wrong. However even with obvious blame on the crew I thought the NTSB did a good job highlighting training deficiencies - especially issue with doing simulator stall training only at relatively low altitude and not letting them go though to full stick pusher stage - which may confuse a crew if the stick pusher does activate. (which kind of mirrors my concern about the need for full on spin training in GA aircraft and gliders. I think it is unforgivable to just teach recovery from an the very earliest incipient stall and pilots should be exposed to deep stalls and spins and their recovery (and yes I know the irony is some people will die in spin training)). Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for the eye openning links. Makes me wanting to replace my airline tickets with a cruise... Interesting to learn that blocked pitot may cause higher reading. I always expected it to show lower reading. I am wondering if this is true for gliders ASI as well. Ramy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Any ASI will behave that way. If the pitot becomes blocked the ASI turns into an Altimeter. The pressure in the pitot side of the ASI remains constant, and the static pressure decreases as you climb. Net result is that the ASI will show increasing airspeed as you climb, and decreasing airspeed as you descend. This of course assumes that the static isn't plugged up as well. Pete |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
stall recognition and recovery
I'm not saying these guys didn't screw up, but lets give them a break.
They're descending at night, in the soup and icing up. What's going through their heads? Is the de-icing system working right? Are we experiencing more icing than this system can handle? If the stab ices up it may result in a steep nose down situation. If the pitot ices up, we may get a false stall warning???? About then the damned "stick- pusher" shoves the nose way down. Stick-shaker OK, stick-pusher BAD idea. JJ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
stall recognition and recovery
On Feb 20, 7:21*am, wrote:
. Stick-shaker OK, stick-pusher BAD idea. JJ The stick pusher will only activate if other stall warning, or low speed protection, systems have failed to prevent the aircraft becoming critically close to stall speed (strictly stall alpha). Why do you think that entering a stall, which for some aircraft may be unrecoverable, is better than having a stick pusher prevent the stall? Andy |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
stall recognition and recovery
Nyal Williams wrote:
Of course I meant the former. I can't even get to the second idea from my statement; I pulled the trigger too quickly on that one - sorry! I should have looked at things more carefully. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
stall recognition and recovery
Not a problem; this has been an interesting thread; time for it to die.
At 02:41 21 February 2009, Eric Greenwell wrote: Nyal Williams wrote: Of course I meant the former. I can't even get to the second idea from my statement; I pulled the trigger too quickly on that one - sorry! I should have looked at things more carefully. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fundamentals of Stall Recovery | w3n-a | Owning | 3 | December 5th 08 07:25 PM |
Recognition of Stalls | w3n-a | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 4th 08 02:52 PM |
Stall Recovery | Danny Deger | Piloting | 12 | January 30th 07 01:01 AM |
Proper stall recovery technique | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 0 | February 2nd 04 10:33 PM |
Qn: Casein Glue recognition | Vassilios Mazis | Soaring | 0 | August 20th 03 10:00 PM |