A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SAAB and EUROFIGHTER question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 19th 08, 03:50 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Therefore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default SAAB and EUROFIGHTER question

Can anyone give me a rundown as to which air craft is the best and the
salient points for the reasons

The Saab aircraft , I would assume cost much less to build than the
Eurofighter but would that decrease its effectiveness in a dog fight

T.I.A. ........................Leslie


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
  #2  
Old August 19th 08, 05:33 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
hielan' laddie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 850
Default SAAB and EUROFIGHTER question

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:36 -0400, Therefore wrote
(in article ):

Can anyone give me a rundown as to which air craft is the best and the
salient points for the reasons


The Eurofighter Typhoon is, probably, a better pure air superiority machine
than the SAAB Grippen. However, the Grippen is by far a better overall
fighter, especially as the lead the Typhoon has in air superiority isn't that
great.

Neither of the two are likely to dethrone the current king of fighter
aircraft, the Su-27 and derivatives thereof, which is considerably better
than the F-15 and at least as good as the F-22.


The Saab aircraft , I would assume cost much less to build than the
Eurofighter but would that decrease its effectiveness in a dog fight


The main reason the Grippen won't sell to the people who will by the Typhoon
is the same reason why those people bought Tornadoes when Viggens were
demonstrably superior. (Especially the RAF, which bought Tornado ADVs which
were _utterly useless_, as their radars had to be removed and replaced by
concrete balast 'cause they didn't bloody work for _years_. The concrete's
gone now, but the radars still don't work the way they were supposed to. A
long-range interceptor which doesn't have a working radar is, basically, a
large lawn dart. The IDS version of the Tornado worked quite well, despite a
high loss rate in Desert Storm, so it wasn't a design problem.) Basically,
it's politics. The Swedes aren't a member of the EuroClub, so they'll get
frozen out.


T.I.A. ........................Leslie


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access



  #3  
Old August 19th 08, 07:25 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
®i©ardo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,950
Default SAAB and EUROFIGHTER question

hielan' laddie wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:36 -0400, Therefore wrote
(in article ):

Can anyone give me a rundown as to which air craft is the best and the
salient points for the reasons


The Eurofighter Typhoon is, probably, a better pure air superiority machine
than the SAAB Grippen. However, the Grippen is by far a better overall
fighter, especially as the lead the Typhoon has in air superiority isn't that
great.

Neither of the two are likely to dethrone the current king of fighter
aircraft, the Su-27 and derivatives thereof, which is considerably better
than the F-15 and at least as good as the F-22.

The Saab aircraft , I would assume cost much less to build than the
Eurofighter but would that decrease its effectiveness in a dog fight


The main reason the Grippen won't sell to the people who will by the Typhoon
is the same reason why those people bought Tornadoes when Viggens were
demonstrably superior. (Especially the RAF, which bought Tornado ADVs which
were _utterly useless_, as their radars had to be removed and replaced by
concrete balast 'cause they didn't bloody work for _years_. The concrete's
gone now, but the radars still don't work the way they were supposed to. A
long-range interceptor which doesn't have a working radar is, basically, a
large lawn dart. The IDS version of the Tornado worked quite well, despite a
high loss rate in Desert Storm, so it wasn't a design problem.) Basically,
it's politics. The Swedes aren't a member of the EuroClub, so they'll get
frozen out.

T.I.A. ........................Leslie


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access



Surely, another reason why the Viggen didn't do well in international
sales was because of an American veto as they were powered by American
engines.

--
Moving things in still pictures!
  #4  
Old August 21st 08, 01:35 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
hielan' laddie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 850
Default SAAB and EUROFIGHTER question

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:25:50 -0400, ®i©ardo wrote
(in article ):

hielan' laddie wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:36 -0400, Therefore wrote
(in article ):

Can anyone give me a rundown as to which air craft is the best and the
salient points for the reasons


The Eurofighter Typhoon is, probably, a better pure air superiority machine
than the SAAB Grippen. However, the Grippen is by far a better overall
fighter, especially as the lead the Typhoon has in air superiority isn't
that
great.

Neither of the two are likely to dethrone the current king of fighter
aircraft, the Su-27 and derivatives thereof, which is considerably better
than the F-15 and at least as good as the F-22.

The Saab aircraft , I would assume cost much less to build than the
Eurofighter but would that decrease its effectiveness in a dog fight


The main reason the Grippen won't sell to the people who will by the
Typhoon
is the same reason why those people bought Tornadoes when Viggens were
demonstrably superior. (Especially the RAF, which bought Tornado ADVs which
were _utterly useless_, as their radars had to be removed and replaced by
concrete balast 'cause they didn't bloody work for _years_. The concrete's
gone now, but the radars still don't work the way they were supposed to. A
long-range interceptor which doesn't have a working radar is, basically, a
large lawn dart. The IDS version of the Tornado worked quite well, despite
a
high loss rate in Desert Storm, so it wasn't a design problem.) Basically,
it's politics. The Swedes aren't a member of the EuroClub, so they'll get
frozen out.

T.I.A. ........................Leslie


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access



Surely, another reason why the Viggen didn't do well in international
sales was because of an American veto as they were powered by American
engines.



That didn't help, but AFIK there's only one verified instance of a sale being
blocked due to that.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 54.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 2 August 19th 08 10:50 PM
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 50.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 3 August 18th 08 11:06 PM
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 48.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 August 18th 08 01:10 PM
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 47.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 August 18th 08 01:10 PM
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 46.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 August 18th 08 01:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.