A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PowerFLARM antenna mounts



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old July 15th 12, 04:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Richard[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 551
Default PowerFLARM antenna mounts

On Saturday, July 14, 2012 8:57:07 AM UTC-7, Peter Higgs wrote:
At 15:03 14 July 2012, Richard wrote:
>On Saturday, July 14, 2012 7:19:34 AM UTC-7, Peter Higgs wrote:
>> At 13:43 14 July 2012, Richard wrote:
>> >On Friday, July 13, 2012 12:11:03 AM UTC-7, Ramy wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:02:33 PM UTC-7, noel.wade wrote:
>> >> > On Jul 9, 10:34=3DA0pm, "Matt Herron Jr.."=
> <m.=3D
>> > wrote:
>> >> > > I won't be buying powerFlarm until the antenna=
> inst=3D
>> >allation is as unobtrusive as my Transponder.
>> >> >=3D20
>> >> > Please see the latest response from the FLARM folks. BUT, =
>please
>> >> > remember that:
>> >> >=3D20
>> >> > 1) The PowerFLARM runs at a *much* lower power level than
>> >> > Transponders. That means that antenna placement and visibi=
>lity is
>> >> > always going to be a slightly touchier issue than with tran=
>sponders.
>> >> >=3D20
>> >> > 2) The Dipole is only 3 inches long (tip to tip) and very
>> >> > unobtrusive.
>> >> > I again refer you to the in-flight photo of my installation=
>:
>> >> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/noel_wade/7518094912/
>> >> > And again, here's Tim Taylor's installation=
>:
>> >> > https://plus.google.com/photos/10893...330632/albums=
>/57617222=3D
>> >49435143009/5761722263754238914
>> >> >=3D20
>> >> > So...
>> >> > Is the FLARM antenna situation annoying? Yes.
>> >> > Are there a few details about the PowerFLARM that I wish we=
>re
>> >> > different? Yes.
>> >> > Is it OK to grumble about this stuff? Sure.
>> >> > Are people blowing the issues up larger than they need to b=
>e (on bot=3D
>> >h
>> >> > sides)? Yes.
>> >> > Is the antenna situation a good reason to avoid buying it? =
>Hell No!
>> >> >=3D20
>> >> > I challenge anyone to find a PowerFLARM user who has instal=
>led the
>> >> > system (after the initial range issues were sorted), and do=
>esn&#=3D
>> >39;t want
>> >> > it or doesn't like using it.
>> >> >=3D20
>> >> > --Noel
>> >>=3D20
>> >> Noel, both your's and Tim's instalation looks great from=
> an
>> >obvio=3D
>> >us reason: the antenna is installed behind the compass! But many of u=
>s
>> >don&=3D
>> >#39;t have compass on top of the glare shield, which makes a big
>> >difference=3D
>> >..
>> >>=3D20
>> >> However I suspected that the claim that the whole dipole antenna=
> must
>> be
>> >=3D
>> >above the glare shield is exaggerated, and this seem to be confirmed =
>by
>> >the=3D
>> > Flarm folks. I would like Flarm to clarify if in their opinion it is
>> >suffi=3D
>> >cient for collision avoidance to have the whole antenna below the gla=
>re
>> >shi=3D
>> >eld.
>> >>=3D20
>> >> Ramy
>> >
>> >Ramy,
>> >
>> >The antenna you may have been waiting for:
>> >
>> >http://www.craggyaero.com/cables_&_antennas.htm
>> >
>> >Approx 3" with a 6" ground plane bulkhead mount. I will in=
>stall in my
>> >Vent=3D
>> >us b and test today and tomorrow. I plan to put the ground on the
>> >undersid=3D
>> >e of the panel cover.
>> >
>> >Richard
>> >www.craggyaero.com
>>=20
>> Hi Richard, unfortunately because of the brewster angle, the
groundplane
>> type of antenna will not receive much from directly ahead, at the same
>> altitude, and even less beneath the groundplane.
>> The Dipole has a maximum response directly forward, but with a null
>> above... something like a ring doughnut.
>>=20
>> Pete
>
>Pete,
>
>I understand all this. I have tested with a spectrum analyzer and did
>not=
> see a significant difference. Also PowerFlarm has recommend this
antenna
>=
>although they said a dipole may be slightly better. If you dipole is
>above=
> the instrument panel I would suspect it is greately degraded by all the
>in=
>struments carbon fiber etc underneath.
>I will do some flight testing today and will post the results.
>
>Richard
>www.craggyaero.com
>
Hi Richard, there are several types of groundplane antennas, including the
one with three counterpoises at 45 deg to the horizontal. All tested by
ground stations, so not really in 'free space'. Also one with the
grondplane in the form of a sharp cone.
However there is one variation, called the 'Sleeved Balun' which uses a
sleeve of second co-ax outer, doubled back along the co-ax. It has to be
at least a quarter wave (taking into account the dielectric constant.) but
I should think 3 inches would be sufficient.
Whatever you use there is bound to be a Null somewhere, and overhead and
underneath with the dipole is probably best in this application.
A proper match of the grondplane (or counterpoise.) is mostly needed to
reduce any SWR on the co-ax, which would otherwise become a radiating part
of the system.

Pete


Pete,

After flying with the Antenna with the 6" ground plane today, I can say it isn't significantly different than the dipole antenna. I still recommend that all use both antennas. I have the 6" ground plane one on my instrument panel cover and a dipole attached vertily to the vent in the nose of my ventus b.

The arch enenmy of perfect is just good enough.

Richard
www.craggyaero.com
  #52  
Old August 14th 14, 01:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Papa3[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 753
Default PowerFLARM antenna mounts

Hey all,

I've read (and reread) the installation notes for PowerFlarm. All of the illustrations I've seen seem to show only one dipole antenna (the Primary Flarm Antenna) mounted above the glareshield. Does this mean that the ADS-B antenna can be mounted underneath? I'm assuming due to the higher power output of Transponders the answer to that is "yes"... Any clarification appreciated.

P3
  #53  
Old August 14th 14, 01:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Luke Szczepaniak
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 177
Default PowerFLARM antenna mounts

On 08/13/2014 8:54 PM, Papa3 wrote:
Hey all,

I've read (and reread) the installation notes for PowerFlarm. All of the illustrations I've seen seem to show only one dipole antenna (the Primary Flarm Antenna) mounted above the glareshield. Does this mean that the ADS-B antenna can be mounted underneath? I'm assuming due to the higher power output of Transponders the answer to that is "yes"... Any clarification appreciated.

P3

I've had issues with the PCAS/ADS-B antenna mounted inside the
instrument pod of my 27. It was surrounded by carbon (both the
instrument pod and the fuselage..) on all sides but the top so I was
only getting traffic warnings from XPNDRs above me.. Other pilots I
know have reported success with this location but I have noticed a
significant improvement since I moved it out side of the instrument tub.

YMMV
Luke
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PowerFLARM Brick and PowerFLARM Remote Display Manuals Available Paul Remde Soaring 30 May 25th 12 11:58 PM
PowerFlarm antenna install Sam Zimmerman Soaring 10 November 11th 10 10:54 PM
Suction cup mounts Ed Winchester[_2_] Soaring 2 September 18th 09 03:58 AM
PDA mounts Mhudson126 Soaring 10 May 19th 04 07:24 PM
Commercial - New PDA mounts from RAM Paul Remde Soaring 0 September 11th 03 06:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.