If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Wow... with all the childish bickering going on here, its a wonder
anything useful comes out of these discussions. Grow up, people! I usually dont get into these, but the name-calling was just getting too much, so here's my 2-cents worth: I purchased a Micro for my 152. I have had some experience with these products, having installed a Monroy 200, then a 300 in my Duchess. What a piece of junk (my opinion). Erroneous altitudes and numbers all over the place. I sent it back and got a Trafficscope VRX. I ended up installing the VRX and I am very impressed with how accurate it (seems) to be. Misses a few planes once in a while, but not enough to keep me from using it. Lesson learned... if theres a choice between to products that do the same thing, the cheaper one is usually less reliable. The Micro doesnt give altitude, but for the $296 I paid for it ($289 + $7 shipping), I wouldnt expect it to. An audio alert would be an interestng add-on, but not really needed since it sits right in front of my nose! Thats bunk if you're looking outside and think you cant see 10 bright LEDs... they really grab your attention. But then, Ive actually used the product. The unit functions similarly to the VRX with respect to reliability... if it lights up, I can usually count on seeing an aircraft. Wish I knew the altitude, but I guess thats what the more expensive unit is for. Anyway, nice job, Surecheck. I will recommend these to whoever asks (and even those that dont). Just wish I could display the traffic info on my Garmin 430. Jim Utic Thomas Borchert wrote: Dave, True. There is no "alert" per se, but it does give an indication as to the nearest aircraft around me Let's see: It's giving you a visual indication. While checking whether that comes on, it will keep you from looking outside where the traffic is - both traffic with an active transponder and that without one. Seems to me that the net result is a loss of total time spent scanning for traffic - for all of 200 bucks. And yes, units with an aural warning are different in that very respect. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Utic" wrote:
...but the name-calling was just getting too much, so here's my 2-cents worth: ... I have had some experience with these products, having installed a Monroy 200, then a 300 in my Duchess. What a piece of junk (my opinion). Erroneous altitudes and numbers all over the place. I had a Monroy 200, now a 300. There are much less frequent anomalies than with the 200, and mine works very well. I will grant that some competing units may work as well or better. But I bought it before the latest competition came out, and I have no buyer's remorse. Fred F. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
There are better systems, but the cost is prohibitive. My experience
with the Monroy was not as pleasant. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Terrorist Alert!!!! :-) | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 7 | March 29th 04 04:15 AM |
controller killed | Jeff | Piloting | 16 | March 5th 04 10:22 AM |
Skyguide traffic controller killed | HECTOP | Piloting | 39 | March 3rd 04 01:46 AM |
FBI Issues Alert Against Almanac Carriers | noname | Military Aviation | 1 | December 30th 03 01:13 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |