A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old February 28th 04, 09:37 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...
Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...


Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)



You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.


Yes, it seems to match yours, so I guess two of us makes it qualify as
typical. :-)


I thought you were disagreeing with me based on ignorance.


  #42  
Old February 28th 04, 09:50 PM
Matthew S. Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...



Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)


You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.


Yes, it seems to match yours, so I guess two of us makes it qualify as
typical. :-)



I thought you were disagreeing with me based on ignorance.



I was. I didn't think you'd admit your ignorance though. Bravo!

Matt

  #43  
Old February 28th 04, 09:55 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...
Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...



Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)


You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.

Yes, it seems to match yours, so I guess two of us makes it qualify as
typical. :-)


I thought you were disagreeing with me based on ignorance.


I was.


That is what makes you a nice guy.


  #44  
Old February 28th 04, 11:11 PM
Scott M. Kozel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JL Grasso wrote:

"Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
JL Grasso wrote:
"Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
JL Grasso wrote:
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.

Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Keyboard!

Thank tarver!


I've spewed soda on at least a dozen keyboards, from reading Splappy's posts.


Same here. I think it's time for a class action suit to recoup some
keyboard money!


Keyboard! (but primarily Splappy's fault)
  #45  
Old February 28th 04, 11:25 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rich Ahrens wrote in message si.com...
Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.



Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Jerry


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)


All those moving parts...


keyboard !
  #46  
Old February 28th 04, 11:26 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...


A pitot tube is a fairly delicate instrument.


like your sobriety ?
  #47  
Old February 28th 04, 11:26 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?


I have no interest.



got that bir right!
  #48  
Old February 29th 04, 02:08 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(running with scissors)


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...


A pitot tube is a fairly delicate instrument.


like your sobriety ?

More like his grasp of reality.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #49  
Old February 29th 04, 05:40 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"running with scissors" wrote in
message om...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message

...
"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...


A pitot tube is a fairly delicate instrument.


like your sobriety ?


And in the next message he shows what a brick brain you are.



  #50  
Old February 29th 04, 05:42 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...
Rich Ahrens wrote:

Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.



Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Jerry


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)


All those moving parts...


Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...
--
-Gord.
No doubt the "Delicate Complicated Electronics" involved would require a

"Senior EE" to supervise/oversee their design for the best interest of all.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service running with scissors Instrument Flight Rules 64 March 3rd 04 05:01 AM
Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service running with scissors Instrument Flight Rules 7 February 28th 04 05:07 PM
To Tarver Engineering fudog50 Military Aviation 2 January 9th 04 07:15 PM
About death threats and other Usenet potpourri :-) Dudley Henriques Military Aviation 4 December 23rd 03 07:16 AM
FS: Aviation History Books Neil Cournoyer Military Aviation 0 August 26th 03 08:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.