If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
(journeyman) wrote
Surely you mean the C-182RG is both complex & high perf. The C-182 is only "high performance". The C-177RG is, of course, "complex" but not "high performance". Yep! A slip of the fingers. :-) Bob Moore |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, I think I understand now and I'm going to try and summarize what I've
gathered from reading the other posts in this thread. Thanks for everyone who answered me even though I know this dead horse has been beaten in the past. Please let me know if I'm wrong. 1) I have a friend who needs to go practice some IFR approaches to stay current. I am a private pilot ASEL. I'm pretty sure that it is not a problem with me being his safety pilot but he told me I can log the time PIC. Is this correct? Yes, the pilot flying in simulated instrument conditions will log PIC because he is the sole manipulator of the controls and I will log PIC because prior to the flight I was designated as the PIC and the safety pilot. I can only log PIC if I'm properly rated for the aircraft that we are flying. 2) What are the requirements for complex and high performance aircraft? I thought that an endorsement was required for planes with retractable gear and a adjustable prop and another for planes with a greater than 200 horsepower engine. In my log book I see an endorsement line for the HP (there isn't a FAR reference though) but not for the complex. I looked up "complex" in the FAR and could not find anything regarding this. 61.31(e) and (f). Thanks for helping me find this. I think the Index should point to these for "Complex" and "High Performance". I have the ASA 2003 FAR/AIM and couldn't find it right off the bat. 3) Ok, now the combination of the two. Lets say I do need an endorsment for the complex/HP aircraft. Can I log time as the safety pilot in this plane if I haven't yet gotten the endorsment for complex/HP? 91.109.b.2 says the safety pilot just needs to be a private pilot with the appropriate category and class ratings. This is kind of answered in the first question but to clear it up I can log the time as safety pilot as long as I meet the category and class requirements. To log PIC in a complex or high perfomance aircraft I must be properly rated. Otherwise I would be considered SIC. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:33:21 GMT, FryGuy wrote:
This is kind of answered in the first question but to clear it up I can log the time as safety pilot as long as I meet the category and class requirements. To log PIC in a complex or high perfomance aircraft I must be properly rated. Otherwise I would be considered SIC. I think you understand it but the use of "rated" in this context is confusing the issue, since that term is used in 91.109 in a different way than you appear to be using it. Rated in this context just refers to category and class (i.e. aircraft, single-engine land). To log PIC as a safety pilot, in addition to being "rated", you must also be current, have the proper endorsements and so forth. In addition, if the pilot flying is also qualified to act as PIC, you must have made an agreement with him that YOU would be the PIC. According to FAA legal opinion, this agreement should be made prior to the flight. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 21:10:41 -0400, Ron Rosenfeld
wrote: Rated in this context just refers to category and class (i.e. aircraft, single-engine land). That should be "airplane, ..." Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:43:09 -0700, "JerryK"
wrote: Here is a wrinkle what if you are rated in category and class, but not current? Ex. you have not landed in class and cat lately. Can you still act as safetly pilot? Of course you can. There is no requirement to be current. 91.109 says "rated". In addition 61.55(d) specifically exempts safety pilots from the requirements of 61.55. You do need a current medical, though. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
is an endorsement for High Performance, without reference to certain FAR
paragraph a valid endorsement? There are a variety of different endorsements, two of which you seem concerned: FAR61.31(e), Complex, defined as Retractable Gear, Flaps and Controllable Pitch Propeller (example, Piper Arrow 200HP, Beech Sundowner 200HP, retractable Cessna Skylane 235HP (also requires High Performance)) or a Seaplane without the retractable gear but has controllable pitch prop and flaps FAR61.31(f), High Performance, Engine with MORE THAN 200HP (example, Beech Bonanza 285HP, Fixed Gear Skylane 235HP) all of which normally have retract gear, prop and flaps Also there is: FAR61.31(g), Pressurized Aircraft at High Altitudes FAR61.31(i), Tail Wheel aircraft FAR61.31(j), Glider, for different launch methods BT "FryGuy" wrote in message 1... I have a couple of questions that are unclear to me regarding being a snip 2) What are the requirements for complex and high performance aircraft? I thought that an endorsement was required for planes with retractable gear and a adjustable prop and another for planes with a greater than 200 horsepower engine. In my log book I see an endorsement line for the HP (there isn't a FAR reference though) but not for the complex. I looked up "complex" in the FAR and could not find anything regarding this. 3) Ok, now the combination of the two. Lets say I do need an endorsment for the complex/HP aircraft. Can I log time as the safety pilot in this plane if I haven't yet gotten the endorsment for complex/HP? 91.109.b.2 says the safety pilot just needs to be a private pilot with the appropriate category and class ratings. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 22:01:22 GMT, Andrew Koenig wrote:
Unless you hold an instructor or ATP certificate, you can only log PIC time for the period during which you are the sole manipulator of the controls. Robert Not true... if more than one pilot is required (pilot and safety Robert pilot) either one may be the PIC and log PIC. Hmmm... other posters differ from you on that. I think you're right -- you need separate endorsements for each kind of high-performance airplane. Robert Not true, an endorsement in a Cessna 210 is good for a Bonanza. That's because a Cessna 210 is both kinds at once, so if you're endorsed for a 210, you effectively have both endorsements. On the other hand, if you're endorsed for a Cessna 177RG, I don't think that endorsement is valid for a 182. The 177 has less than 200 HP? If it does then the 182 might not be valid for the 177 RG. Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
More than once, I've wondered what the regs were prior to some change. Does anyone know of a web site that allows you to look up what the regs were on a certain date? Yes, I believe the FAA site itself lets you enter a date and get the regs as of that date. Search for it - it's not that easy to find but I know I've run across it. It goes by some non-obvious name (or did when I saw it) Jose (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
As you have already seen, lots of people seem to remember private
interpretations or letters from the FAA ruling one way or another. The regulations say that you have to be rated in category and class to act as safety pilot. That means a pilot certified for airplane single engine land can act as safety pilot in any single engine land airplane, from a Pilatus PC-12 to a Cessna 152. The appropriate FAR says: (b) No person may operate a civil aircraft in simulated instrument flight unless -- (1) The other control seat is occupied by a safety pilot who possesses at least a private pilot certificate with category and class ratings appropriate to the aircraft being flown. There is no regulatory requirement that you be able to act as PIC in order to log PIC under any circumstances. In fact the FARs are quite clear about when you may log PIC: (e) Logging pilot-in-command flight time. (1) A recreational, private, or commercial pilot may log pilot-in- command time only for that flight time during which that person -- (i) Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated; (ii) Is the sole occupant of the aircraft; or (iii) Except for a recreational pilot, is acting as pilot in command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is conducted. A strict reading of these two regulations would indicate that a private pilot holding a certificated for single engine land airplanes may log PIC for the time he is acting as safety pilot in a complex or high performance airplane whether he is signed off for those airplanes or not. Others in the FAA or anywhere else may differ in their personal opinions and may even have written letters or articles stating their opinions, but those letters and articles are just that: opinions. It should be remembered that many of these people are attempting to enforce their opinion when they could not get their ideas enacted in the regulations. They lost in committee and review, so now they are attempting to mold public behavior through threats and intimidation. If the regulations do not mean what they say, then the regulations need to be amended. Until then, the regulations have the force of law. All of that being the case, my own personal opinion is that any pilot would be very foolish to attempt to act as safety pilot in any airplane that he was not fully qualified to operate. I think the regulations should be changed. But right now the regulations are specific: you may act as safety pilot and log PIC while doing it. There are no loopholes, gray areas, or private interpretations here that make a convincing argument that the regulations do not permit it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message A strict reading of these two regulations would indicate that a private pilot holding a certificated for single engine land airplanes may log PIC for the time he is acting as safety pilot in a complex or high performance airplane whether he is signed off for those airplanes or not. No a strict reading doesn't say that. He may be a safety pilot, as that requires only ratings. He can not log safety pilot time as PIC time as he can not legally be PIC. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
AF investigators cite pilot error in fighter crash | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 09:55 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |