A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Email from MBNA AOPA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 28th 06, 06:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Email from MBNA AOPA

It's not as silly as it seems at first sight.
Yes, it is.


No, it isn't.

Mind you, I'm not saying it's not silly. It is just less silly than it
seems. It seems sillier than it is.

Unless, of course, he includes in his advertising the information that he
will discount the price by some amount for people not using credit cards.
There's no prohibition against any such advertising.


No, but there are rules about it. The discounted price cannot be more
prominent than the nominal price.

Also, I most often run into merchants adding this fee to credit card users
(in the form of a discount for everyone else) in situations where there is
no real concept of "advertised price". My dentist, for example.


Hmmm. I'll have to ask my dentist about that too. But if somebody
calls and says "how much is an exam", the price that is quoted should be
the non-discounted price. There really =is= a concept of "advertised
price", it's just, well, not advertised.

And of course, your explanation begs the question of why a credit card
company would write into their contracts a loophole...
your explanation requires that one assume that the credit card company cares
more about how their clients advertise and less about whether credit card
users are charged a surcharge or not.


Historically, I believe that is the case. IIRC, the "discount for cash"
gave an advantage to merchants who did this, to the detriment of
merchants who did not. CC companies valued the latter more, and
listened to their complaints (and the complaints of CC holders who
resented being charged). By putting in this rule, they induced people
to use CCs more, which is what the CC companies are =really= interested in.

They still valued the other merchants, and I guess that was the
compromise that was reached. I think some attorney generals got
involved too.

Jose
--
He who laughs, lasts.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #32  
Old December 28th 06, 07:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
skym
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Email from MBNA AOPA


I'll start using cash, I suppose. But some FBO's actually have given
me a 5% discount for using the AOPA card; then I get a 5% discount from
MBNA when I turn it in at the end of the year as part of my application
for the 5% rebate. Works out to a 9.75% discount on some (but few,
and, small) discounts. Since my annual is always put on the card, plus
all else, I always count on a $250/yr rebate, anyway.

  #33  
Old December 28th 06, 12:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 782
Default Email from MBNA AOPA

Jose wrote:
It's not as silly as it seems at first sight.

Yes, it is.


No, it isn't.

Mind you, I'm not saying it's not silly. It is just less silly than it
seems. It seems sillier than it is.


Is surface appearance the true measure of how silly it is?
  #34  
Old December 28th 06, 05:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Email from MBNA AOPA

Is surface appearance the true measure of how silly it is?

No, but it's the true measure of how silly it seems.

Jose
--
He who laughs, lasts.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #35  
Old December 28th 06, 05:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Email from MBNA AOPA

I didn't think it was as silly as it seemed.

You and I agree.

Jose
--
He who laughs, lasts.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pilot claims no blame in July crash Mortimer Schnerd, RN Piloting 48 March 15th 06 09:00 PM
MBNA Aircraft Financing att news group Owning 29 November 7th 05 04:10 AM
Searching information about Mike Fisher PitCock Home Built 2 January 17th 05 09:31 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
email attack Richard Lamb Home Built 21 September 29th 03 06:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.