If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:49:25 -0500, "Stan's News"
wrote: All, Bush is a bum, a skull and bones moron...., Cheney's stooge, and by the way Cheney is a bum too. Democrats, Republicans are all bums. Politics is the biggest bunch of bull**** and the boys are running the show. I like the saying, "I never vote, it only encourages them...." :-) Ron Wanttaja |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message
... On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:49:25 -0500, "Stan's News" wrote: All, Bush is a bum, a skull and bones moron...., Cheney's stooge, and by the way Cheney is a bum too. Democrats, Republicans are all bums. Politics is the biggest bunch of bull**** and the boys are running the show. I like the saying, "I never vote, it only encourages them...." :-) Ron Wanttaja You guys could start a new political party - United Anarchists of the World (UAW). Rich S. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:15:27 -0800, "Rich S."
wrote: "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message Bush is a bum, a skull and bones moron...., Cheney's stooge, and by the way Cheney is a bum too. Democrats, Republicans are all bums. Politics is the biggest bunch of bull**** and the boys are running the show. I like the saying, "I never vote, it only encourages them...." :-) You guys could start a new political party - United Anarchists of the World (UAW). Well, anarchy is better than no government at all... :-) Ron Wanttaja |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message
... On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:15:27 -0800, "Rich S." wrote: You guys could start a new political party - United Anarchists of the World (UAW). Well, anarchy is better than no government at all... :-) Ron Wanttaja Choosing the lesser of two weevils, I'd say that it may be a bit difficult for anarchist to agree on a candidate. Rich "subtlety ain't my forté" S. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
wrote:
Did I somehow get the syntax incorrect with the sarcasm off flag? Was there supposed to be an underline instead of a space or something? Funny, this sarcasm thing. One man's sarcasm is another's "Right on!" -- UA -- |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Did Hitler or IS Bush ( Who in my Honest Opinion is the GREATEST
PRESIDENT WE'VE HAD SINCE TEDDY ROOSEVELT) Building an Airplane? I Didn't think so... Now what implications does that have for this thread's appropriateness...... hmmmm can we figure it out together? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Top Sirloin" wrote in message ... On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 06:44:56 -0500, "Larry Smith" wrote: Like seizing private citizens and imprisoning them without trial, without formal charges? If this is true you should have no problem finding us lots of references for this statement Larry. Now I want you to read this, Scott, especially the last paragraph with the words of Founding Father, James Madison. It is entitled "No Charges and No Trial; Just Jail": http://www.cato.org/dailys/08-21-03.html |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Larry, Larry, Larry,
While I hate to agree with a guy who claims to have hardware in lunar and martian orbit, for example, who always posts in invisible ink,) And while a lot of the Patriot Act alarms me… It seems to me Larry, there was plenty of precedence for locking up "the usual suspects" into Japanese internment camps during WWII. These were US citizens not charged with anything or afforded legal counsel. We won that war, remember? When 100% of your terrorists are mid-eastern males it's just dumb to be deep cavity-searching little old ladies from Pasadena that don't have the physical strength to take over a flight in the name of fair play. This kind of PC where everybody gets a lawyer prior to lengthy interrogation is going to result in another intelligence shortfall. And that is going to result in a dirty bomb going off in one of our harbors. But you, predictably, would prefer an explosion to some lawyer being out of work. pacplyer "Larry Smith" wrote: Like seizing private citizens and imprisoning them without trial, without formal charges? If this is true you should have no problem finding us lots of references for this statement Larry. Now I want you to read this, Scott, especially the last paragraph with the words of Founding Father, James Madison. It is entitled "No Charges and No Trial; Just Jail": http://www.cato.org/dailys/08-21-03.html |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"pacplyer" wrote in message om... Larry, Larry, Larry, While I hate to agree with a guy who claims to have hardware in lunar and martian orbit, for example, who always posts in invisible ink,) And while a lot of the Patriot Act alarms me. It seems to me Larry, there was plenty of precedence Are you talking about "precedents"? No the Japanese internment was not precedent and every legal scholar in the country, including the courts, agrees that THAT was illegal and violated core mandates of the United States Constitution. It was really a hate reaction after Pearl Harbor. for locking up "the usual suspects" into Japanese internment camps during WWII. These were US citizens not charged with anything or afforded legal counsel. We won that war, remember? When 100% of your terrorists are mid-eastern males Jose Padilla is a black man from Chicago. And a federal court has already said that Bush and that goofy attorney general whatshisname can't hold Padilla without charging him and providing him due process. We won the war against British who did that to us, remember? Now you git, boy, unless you're building an aeroplane. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
my main question is....
DID LARRY EVERY GET HIS LATCHES? or is he still filling them outa a solid block of stainless steel? lmao BLLL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bush/Hitler creates another phony "terrorist" incident to suppressus... | Ronald Gardner | Home Built | 4 | December 29th 03 09:19 PM |