If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Okay... so it is now well established that 800MHz operation is illegal
in aircraft, and while 1900MHz operation is not prohibited by laws, the reality is that it doesn't work that well over 2000AGL, more or less. Now the real question---as a backup phone for traveling, does it make more sense to go with a "cheapie" PCS-only phone, or pay more for Verizon and a tri-mode phone, assuming that all modes are either illegal or impractical in the air? I have learned much from this discussion and in researching earlier ones! |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
-- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
as a backup phone for traveling, does it make more sense to go with a "cheapie" PCS-only phone, or pay more for Verizon and a tri-mode phone, assuming that all modes are either illegal or impractical in the air? (oops) Depends what kind of "backup" you are looking for. I use my palm VIIx and CBAV for aviation stuff, and a full tri-mode cell phone for cell phone stuff. I don't have a backup comm, but in an emergency I would certainly use the cell. If I were looking for something specifically for an aviation emergency backup, I'd get a portable nav-comm. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
C J Campbell wrote: I recall reading somewhere that FCC regulations against using cellular phones in flight do not apply to digital phones. No, the regulations differential between PCS and cellular. Digital cellular phones still create problmes. George Patterson This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind". |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
No, the regulations differential between PCS and cellular. Digital cellular phones still create problmes. What's the difference between PCS and digital cellular? Jos -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg Copeland" wrote in message news Hmm. Everything I've ever read says that maximum output is 5-watts. I'm not saying that's right, but that has been a constant. At 5 watts your battery would last about 5 minutes, if that. I'm not sure how far you could even transmit on 0.6 of watt. With my external antenna that I use when hunting I usually see 25-30 miles without much problem. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Teacherjh wrote: What's the difference between PCS and digital cellular? The main thing is the frequency set. By definition, cellphones use frequencies near the middle of the 800 MhZ band. By definition, PCS phones are up in the 1900 MhZ band. George Patterson This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind". |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Newps wrote:
"Greg Copeland" wrote in message news Hmm. Everything I've ever read says that maximum output is 5-watts. I'm not saying that's right, but that has been a constant. At 5 watts your battery would last about 5 minutes, if that. My Nokia 6820 will give 7 hours talk time and 10 days just switched on off a tiny battery. There's no way it's even 1 watt transmit, let alone 5 (at least under normal circumstances). -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Greg Copeland wrote in message .. .
Recentingly, in another thread, cell phones and planes came up. I thought others might be interested in these links. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1568024,00.asp http://wirelesscabin.com/ http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1...art.html?pg=12 The general theory on modern cell phones in flight, goes like this: The FCC also has a ban because when you're in flight, you're always at least 6-8 miles away from the nearest cell tower. You end up communicating with too many towers and bogging down the network. One or two such calls is tolerable, but a whole plane load moving through would disrupt the ground-based users of the network. Remember, the farther you are from a tower, the more power your cell phone uses to communicate with it's tower; up to 5-watts. Worse, a plane full of 5-watt transmitters causes terrestrial interference problems for the land cell users, in a large radius around the plane. snip Back in the mid 90's I was flying to Boston from Kentucky to do aerial photography. The company I worked for provided us with the cell phones. On this trip I was using one of the old bag phones (I think they put ot 3 watts?). Anyway, We were flying in a C-310 around Ashland Ky (about 5000 feet) and we made a phone call and talked for less than 5 minutes. Well, about 25 minutes later we made another call, I think we were just South of Pittsburg (??). So, jump forward to the next day. We were in Boston and were going to start a long day of photography. We needed to call back to our boss in KY and the phone did not work. I ended up calling the cell phone company from a land line. They told me that on the previous day my cell phone made a call on a cell tower near Ashland Ky. About 25 minutes later a cell call was placed from Pittsburg, PA. They cell company flagged this call since they believed that NO one could travel from Ashland Ky to Pittsburg in 20-25 minutes. They believed that the cell phone ID was cloned. I told them we were on a very important business trip and to turn back on the phone and we would take care of the problem later. I didn't tell them we were flying and placing the calls. ;-) Recently I upgraded by 2 year old Cingular phone to the new GSM phone (Motorola V400). I went flying and noticed that every few minutes I would get a funny buzzing sounds on my Telex ANR headsets. My friend was using traditional Non-ANR David Clarke headsets and didn't hear any buzz. I've also noticed that if I place this GSM phone near my computer monitor or speakers at work it would produce the same buzz. I guess these new GSM phones will cause some strange reactions on aviation (and ANR) frequences. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark" wrote in message
om... Recently I upgraded by 2 year old Cingular phone to the new GSM phone (Motorola V400). I went flying and noticed that every few minutes I would get a funny buzzing sounds on my Telex ANR headsets. My friend was using traditional Non-ANR David Clarke headsets and didn't hear any buzz. I've also noticed that if I place this GSM phone near my computer monitor or speakers at work it would produce the same buzz. I guess these new GSM phones will cause some strange reactions on aviation (and ANR) frequences. It's sort of a feature of GSM (no matter what frequency band) and iDEN phones to announce themselves on whatever electronics is nearby. Folks in Europe are pretty accustomed to hear an incoming call on their TV sets even before the phone rings. When I used to carry my company NEXTEL phone with me, I could hear it changing cells on my AR108 airband scanner. The moral is - try _not_ to use TDMA-based (DAMPS, GSM, and iDEN) phones while airborne. Dima |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 30th 04 11:16 AM |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | April 15th 04 06:17 AM |
Cell phones with GPS | Roger Halstead | Piloting | 0 | December 24th 03 03:04 AM |
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | October 2nd 03 12:17 AM |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 03 04:43 AM |