A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Disruptive Technology



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 18th 04, 08:47 AM
Ross Oliver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 17 Oct 2004 00:58:25 GMT, Steelgtr62 wrote:
Meanwhile, as a beginning disruptive technology, the electric car...snip



The flaw in your argument is that an electric car is a product,
not a technology. Until a truly a disruptive technological
breakthrough in electrical energy storage is developed, electric
vehicles must suffer only incremental improvements.


  #12  
Old October 18th 04, 09:50 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bill Daniels" wrote
I still have an IBM PC XT that works as well as the day it was bought back
in 1985. It just doesn't do anything useful in today's world.


There is a Bendix T-12C ADF installed in my airplane. It has been
there for decades and still works as well as it ever did. It just
doesn't do anything useful in today's world.

Well, maybe. In fact it allows me to legally shoot the approach into
my home field. In reality, I shoot it with the panel LORAN and
yokemount GPS - either of which is far more accurate and reliable -
but for the sake of legalities the ADF must be there. In theory I am
supposed to use it as the primary reference, but nobody can prove I
don't.

And thus my point - your IBM PC-XT does nothing useful because the
regulatory climate is quite relaxed in personal computer use. Not so
when it comes to panel-mount avionics in certified aircraft. I fully
expect that the first-generation glass panel displays will still have
significant value a decade from now (and maybe three decades) because
the FAA acts as a massive brake on innovation.

Michael
  #13  
Old October 18th 04, 10:19 PM
Steelgtr62
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If there were more people flying they would load that brake harder and
eventually it would become politically inexpedient. Look at CB radio, the FCC
decided it wasn't worth the candle.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Living with Technology quilljar Aerobatics 0 July 30th 03 09:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.