A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

JS3 chatter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old January 2nd 17, 07:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default JS3 chatter

Wish I had the airbrake locking feature on the Stemme. Currently I have
to have my wife dump the flaps after landing. If I let go of the
airbrake lever to retract the flaps (to increase weight on the gear),
the brakes are as likely to close as not. In cross winds that can be a
problem with a wing wanting to lift.

On 1/2/2017 10:56 AM, wrote:
I like that they relocated the wheel brake on the stick, uncoupling it from the airbrake. That and the airbrake locking mechanism should simplify the landing roll.

CG


--
Dan, 5J
  #92  
Old January 2nd 17, 07:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default JS3 chatter

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 6:07:57 AM UTC-8, wrote:
More info on air venting inside the cockpit ?

I've seen the central channel and the sealed hole for instruments cooling but I don't see any vent directing air flow to the pilot.

How can the pilot avoid boiling in the Australian hot weather ? Only the slide window ?



In the long video on the WGC webpage, the right side of the cockpit above the landing gear handle has two small vents with a circular knob in between. Perhaps a small hidden electric fan controlled by the knob takes in air through one of these two vents and sends it out toward the pilot through the other. Just a guess.
  #93  
Old January 4th 17, 03:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 190
Default JS3 chatter

Like the a model Ventus, the JS3 appears to have a small man's cockpit. Wonder if a 6'2" pilot with wide shoulders and a little extra "insulation" will fit? You guys in Benella give us the scoop.
  #94  
Old January 4th 17, 05:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
krasw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 668
Default JS3 chatter

No it doesn't. It is the same old ASH 26 cockpit size.
  #95  
Old January 4th 17, 05:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Duster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 161
Default JS3 chatter

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 1:22:43 PM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
Wish I had the airbrake locking feature on the Stemme. Currently I have
to have my wife dump the flaps after landing.
Dan, 5J


Now we know the real reason Dan brings his wife along to fly... we were misled into thinking he was just being a thoughtful husband!
  #96  
Old January 4th 17, 06:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 374
Default JS3 chatter

I am sure, and have been told by people who have seen it, that it is a good sized cockpit but I can't see the relevance of judging an obviously different newly designed fuselage and cockpit to the ASH 26. The JS1?- fair enough. But not the JS3.
  #97  
Old January 5th 17, 12:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 190
Default JS3 chatter

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 12:18:41 PM UTC-5, krasw wrote:
No it doesn't. It is the same old ASH 26 cockpit size.


To me, it appears Uys "fills" his JS3 cockpit but looks can deceive. Seeing the likes of Bruce Taylor or one of the Goudriaan brothers flying it will be more convincing.
  #98  
Old January 5th 17, 01:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default JS3 chatter

Bingo! Happy wife, happy life!

On 1/4/2017 10:28 AM, Duster wrote:
On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 1:22:43 PM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
Wish I had the airbrake locking feature on the Stemme. Currently I have
to have my wife dump the flaps after landing.
Dan, 5J

Now we know the real reason Dan brings his wife along to fly... we were misled into thinking he was just being a thoughtful husband!


--
Dan, 5J
  #99  
Old January 5th 17, 07:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
krasw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 668
Default JS3 chatter

On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 20:28:19 UTC+2, wrote:
I am sure, and have been told by people who have seen it, that it is a good sized cockpit but I can't see the relevance of judging an obviously different newly designed fuselage and cockpit to the ASH 26. The JS1?- fair enough. But not the JS3.


I think this was dicussed earlier, but judging from the photos JS3 fuselage shape is extremely close/identical to JS1 which is "borrowed" aerodynamically from ASH 26. I do not wan't to downplay the importance of new structure, wing-fuselage junction and several other detail improvements, and the design work associated, but general shape still looks identical to '26. Making small size cockpit is just plain stupid, people are not getting smaller in future.
  #100  
Old January 5th 17, 10:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Iain Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default JS3 chatter

At 07:29 05 January 2017, krasw wrote:
I think this was dicussed earlier, but judging from the photos JS3
fuselage=
shape is extremely close/identical to JS1 which is "borrowed"
aerodynamica=
lly from ASH 26. I do not wan't to downplay the importance of new
structure=
, wing-fuselage junction and several other detail improvements,

and the
des=
ign work associated, but general shape still looks identical to '26.
Making=
small size cockpit is just plain stupid, people are not getting

smaller
in=
future.


It is not a small size cockpit.

Doubt that anyone has ever described Oscar Goudriaan as a small
man yet he has flown at least five 1000km+ flights in his JS1, flight
times up to eight hours. His brother Laurens is larger and at times
has had back problems, yet has flown multiple flights of 750km+ in
his JS1. If the cockpit was cramped then they would not have been
able to do these long flights - and not at such high speeds with
impaired decision-making due to discomfort.

There was a Dutch JS1 owner who - if I recall correctly - is at least
1.96m tall. That's 6'5"...

Gordon Boettger is also 6'5" and has commented that "after
removing the seat back and still wearing a parachute, I was able to
comfortably fit into the JS1. I wouldn't think that 9-10 hours in the
glider would be a problem."

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cockpit Chatter and Groundcrew Gripes Andie Ankey-Upcuff General Aviation 1 June 9th 05 02:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.