If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message et... [snip] CBS should be ashamed at themselves for the damage to this country they could cause by these sensationalist pieces. There are just too many things CBS (or NBC, or ABC, or...) should be ashamed of that one more won't make much difference. Generally, these people are interested in eyeball count first and maybe factual presentations second. Well maybe tenth on the facts part. Sensationalism gets viewers. That is a fact of the news/entertainment business. Maybe we should change the name to newsertainment. IMO, the ONLY way to effect a change in the way these people "report" GA news is to effect their revenues. I propose we use whatever methods we have at our disposal to counter their lines of bilge, and critize their inaccuracies with as much professionalism as possible. Threatening to not watch is fine. But getting others to realize the poor quality of the reporting is much more effective. Sorta like the "give a fish-teach to fish thing" Joining AOPA and other GA friendly organizations is a good start. Actively promoting GA to everyone who will listen is another method. Volunteer at Young Eagle events; cultivate the friendship of newspaper/magazine/local radio reporters. Get the word out about the positive things GA provides to the general public. I'm sure there are many more I haven't mentioned. A truly informed viewer would be the death of network news as it is structured today. Will my singular efforts make much of a diference? I don't know, but I'm going to try. VideoGuy |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Besides what I posted above, I PS'd my email to CBS by telling them to relay
a message to their advertisers that I will no longer be viewing any CBS shows, including their network news. Then I emailed a local FBO owner who promptly got a hold of the nearest CBS affiliate to interview him. No where did I indicate that I was a pilot. -- Jim Burns III Remove "nospam" to reply So here I am, ready to write something. I see your point, but what alternative is there to complaining? I don't like the idea of ignoring it. What do people suggest? BTW, I was planning to ask when they'll be discussing the fact that trucks can go anywhere without flight plans or talking to ground traffic control. Considering how often trucks have been used in terrorist attacks, both world-wide and in the US, this is terrifying. I wasn't even going to mention that I'm a pilot (it's not really relevant to my point). - Andrew |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not supporting CBS in anyway, and I do believe GA gets a lot of this kind of publicity, as is often stated on this forum, because we are a small "elite" minority. OTOH, I don't think the fear, rational or irrational, is based on the Tampa scenario. It is based on loading up a small twin, or a heavy single with explosives and following that with some suicide activity. I don't know anything about explosives, but I suspect that the 900+ useful load in a 182 could carry enough explosives to be pretty brutal in a crowded place. I know, I know - there are plenty of equivalent threats that are not monitored (I liked the post about trucks/OKC). I just don't like to take the stance that GA is no threat - what happens after some incident occurs? Does GA become shut down? On a macro scale the problem is trying to manage all terrorist risk at the expense of common sense and reality. On a less grand scale, I just would like to see GA as concerned and proactive, since I'm afraid of what the government will do if they are allowed, through an incident, to become reactive. This doesn't take away from the fact that the CBS trailer is ridiculous. Michael "Max T, CFI" wrote in message news:t0hNb.66605$xy6.125011@attbi_s02... Here's the email I sent to our CBS channel 5 in S.F. last night. So far no response. Max T, MCFI Brian, Regarding the teaser for Wednesday's CBS Evening News: "There are thousands of general aviation airstrips around the country with little or no security. How can that be after 9-11? We'll have the story on Wednesday's CBS Evening News." You might want to consider on the local news going to a local airport and showing people how small these planes are, how little they carry, and hence how tiny a threat they are compared to airliners carrying thousands of gallons of gasoline. From the www.aopa.org website, AOPA President Phil Boyer testified before congress in 2001 that "in this national tragedy, it was airline security that was breached, and airline transport category equipment used as weapons. However, general aviation was the last allowed to return to the sky, and not all GA is yet flying. "We're not talking about big airplanes," Boyer told Congress. "We're talking about 4-place, single-engine aircraft that are on average 30 years old, cost the same as a car, and have the same weight and kinetic energy of a car." You only have to look at the pictures of the Cessna that the teenager flew into a building in Tampa to see that these planes are incapable of causing much damage. Most of these planes carry so little fuel they don't even burn when there's an accident. Give me a call if you want to talk further. I'll be in a meeting from 9-11AM, but should otherwise be free. best regards, xxxxx |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Not that it will do any good, but I sent the following to CBS:
I am writing, with no expectations of it having any effect, to express my grave dissatisfaction with the promotional spots you are running for this evening's newscasts. In these spots, you promise to reveal the grave security threat that general aviation airports pose to our country. These spots - and presumably the report you intend to run this evening - are focused on a threat that is at best extremely remote. Like almost any other pilot, I could cite any number of reasons why this nation's light aircraft present far less of a threat than nearly every other means of transportation. The simple fact, however, is that your organization isn't even remotely concerned with telling the other side of the story. Any number of national organizations, such as the Airplane Owners and Pilot's Association (AOPA), would have happily granted on-camera interviews for this story if they had been invited to do so. Since CBS News failed to take even this basic and obvious step, one can only conclude that your broadcast will reflect only one reporter's misguided understanding of the world. CBS News is not serving the public interest with this report, and is not adhering to it's commitment to use the public airwaves in a responsible manner. In closing, I want to assure you that my letter should not be taken as an indicator that I will be viewing your broadcast this evening. I also won't bore you with threats to boycott your broadcasts in the future. The truth of the matter is that my family simply gave away our television three years ago, and have never looked back. A big part of our decision to do so came from being exposed to over-hyped, inaccurate, and uninformative news reports such as this one. In fact, I urge to continue on the road you have chosen. Every time you present something that a good number of people know to be patently false, you impugn your credibility with the public even further. Eventually, you just may offend everyone enough to get them to follow my family's example. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... | | "John Gaquin" wrote in message | ... | | "Maule Driver" wrote in message | | I'm hoping that it is a more level headed report ... | | From network news? a level-headed report? still smokin' that funny | stuff, | huh? | | From CBS, no less; the folks that blew up a pickup truck to show how they | could...well, blow up. I believe that was NBC. The truck would not blow up when rammed from the side so they attached fireworks to make sure that they got a nice explosion. Then they ran a show on how dangerous the truck was. This was one of those rare cases where the manufacturer successfully sued for defamation. You sure? I thought it was a part of "60 Minutes". |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in
: "David H" wrote in message ... | I just saw a "teaser" piece during the CBS Evening News promoting | their "investigation" on security at GA airports, to air tomorrow | (Wed. 1/14). It looks like it's going to be just awful. | The way to respond to shows like this is to increase security. If we see news media photographing the airport or interviewing people at the airport, we should tackle the reporter, throw him or her to the ground, and smash his camera equipment. Then we should explain that we do not allow the airport or personnel associated with the airport to be photographed or interviewed because that would compromise security. They want tough security measures? Then let's give them tough security measures! They should also be held incommunicado for 30 days after the incident (in the FBO restrooms) as an added security precaution. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael 182" wrote in message news:hChNb.66255$8H.106469@attbi_s03... I'm not supporting CBS in anyway, and I do believe GA gets a lot of this kind of publicity, as is often stated on this forum, because we are a small "elite" minority. OTOH, I don't think the fear, rational or irrational, is based on the Tampa scenario. It is based on loading up a small twin, or a heavy single with explosives and following that with some suicide activity. I don't know anything about explosives, but I suspect that the 900+ useful load in a 182 could carry enough explosives to be pretty brutal in a crowded place. You could carry a lot more explosives in a 3/4 ton pickup or a 12 foot U-Haul or fake UPS truck. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"VideoGuy" gkasten at brick dot net wrote in message ... "Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message et... [snip] CBS should be ashamed at themselves for the damage to this country they could cause by these sensationalist pieces. There are just too many things CBS (or NBC, or ABC, or...) should be ashamed of that one more won't make much difference. Generally, these people are interested in eyeball count first and maybe factual presentations second. Well maybe tenth on the facts part. Sensationalism gets viewers. That is a fact of the news/entertainment business. Anyone read Michael Crichton's book "Airframe"? Completely skewers the "news" media. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
As I said in my original post "I know, I know - there are plenty of
equivalent threats that are not monitored (I liked the post about trucks/OKC). I just don't like to take the stance that GA is no threat - what happens after some incident occurs? Does GA become shut down?" "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Michael 182" wrote in message news:hChNb.66255$8H.106469@attbi_s03... I'm not supporting CBS in anyway, and I do believe GA gets a lot of this kind of publicity, as is often stated on this forum, because we are a small "elite" minority. OTOH, I don't think the fear, rational or irrational, is based on the Tampa scenario. It is based on loading up a small twin, or a heavy single with explosives and following that with some suicide activity. I don't know anything about explosives, but I suspect that the 900+ useful load in a 182 could carry enough explosives to be pretty brutal in a crowded place. You could carry a lot more explosives in a 3/4 ton pickup or a 12 foot U-Haul or fake UPS truck. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Geoffrey Barnes" wrote in message nk.net... Not that it will do any good, but I sent the following to CBS: [snip] In closing, I want to assure you that my letter should not be taken as an indicator that I will be viewing your broadcast this evening. I also won't bore you with threats to boycott your broadcasts in the future. The truth of the matter is that my family simply gave away our television three years ago, and have never looked back. A big part of our decision to do so came from being exposed to over-hyped, inaccurate, and uninformative news reports such as this one. Good man!! I disconnected our cable two years ago...we have a 54" TV, but the only signal it gets from the DVD and VCR players. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
08 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 8th 03 11:28 PM |