A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

cost to install engine analyzer (4 cyl)?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old October 2nd 06, 01:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 678
Default Why a rough engine? (Was: cost to install engine analyzer (4 cyl)?)


"Andrew Gideon" wrote:


On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:33:54 -0500, Dan Luke wrote:

One or more cylinders wiil get too lean before the others, causing uneven
power production.


So the rough running is called by cylinders generating different power
levels? Why can't that occur anywhere in the air/fuel mixture curve?


I guess it does, to some extent. The difference isn't detectable until the
leanest cylinder is about to flame out.


  #22  
Old October 2nd 06, 03:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Why a rough engine? (Was: cost to install engine analyzer(4 cyl)?)



Andrew Gideon wrote:




So the rough running is called by cylinders generating different power
levels? Why can't that occur anywhere in the air/fuel mixture curve?


Assuming the moving metal parts are very close together in weights the
only other thing that will affect noticeable vibration is the cylinders
making different amounts of power. If you can get each cylinder to peak
within about .2 gph you will have a very smooth engine indeed.
  #23  
Old October 2nd 06, 02:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default Why a rough engine? (Was: cost to install engine analyzer (4 cyl)?)


"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:33:54 -0500, Dan Luke wrote:

One or more cylinders wiil get too lean before the others, causing uneven
power production.


So the rough running is called by cylinders generating different power
levels? Why can't that occur anywhere in the air/fuel mixture curve?


Andrew, every question you asked is clearly answered, in depth, in John
Deakin's AvWeb series about engine operations, including graphs and charts.
In color!!

Do your homework, lad!

Matt B.

--
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious, but it cannot
survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable,
for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves
amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through
all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the
traitor
appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and
he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness
that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation,
he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of
the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A
murderer is less to fear. -- Marcus Tullius Cicero



  #24  
Old October 4th 06, 12:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
randall g
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 60
Default Why a rough engine? (Was: cost to install engine analyzer (4 cyl)?)

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:26:40 -0400, Andrew Gideon
wrote:

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:33:54 -0500, Dan Luke wrote:

One or more cylinders wiil get too lean before the others, causing uneven
power production.


So the rough running is called by cylinders generating different power
levels? Why can't that occur anywhere in the air/fuel mixture curve?



When you are running at a typical rich setting, the maximum possible
combustion will be occurring in all cylinders. The excess unburned fuel
is blown out the exhaust. Since cylinders are about the same size and
compression, you have very similar powers being developed.

Once you start leaning though, the first cylinders to lean past max
power will begin developing less power while all the others are still at
max. This uneven distribution in power results in roughness. As you
continue leaning the cylinders get more unbalanced.

I have just installed Gamijectors in my engine and am about to receive a
second set. They iterate with you until you get peak power/temperatures
to coincide on all cylinders. Once this is done, you can lean quite
aggressively without unbalancing the power produced.

Read Deakins articles on the subject:
http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/list.html



randall g =%^) PPASEL+Night 1974 Cardinal RG
http://www.telemark.net/randallg
Lots of aerial photographs of British Columbia at:
http://www.telemark.net/randallg/photos.htm
Vancouver's famous Kat Kam: http://www.katkam.ca
  #25  
Old October 4th 06, 02:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Why a rough engine? (Was: cost to install engine analyzer(4 cyl)?)



randall g wrote:



When you are running at a typical rich setting, the maximum possible
combustion will be occurring in all cylinders.




Not quite. This only happens at a certain mixture setting. Any other
setting reduces power.


  #26  
Old October 4th 06, 05:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
randall g
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 60
Default Why a rough engine? (Was: cost to install engine analyzer (4 cyl)?)

On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:39:26 -0600, Newps wrote:



randall g wrote:



When you are running at a typical rich setting, the maximum possible
combustion will be occurring in all cylinders.




Not quite. This only happens at a certain mixture setting. Any other
setting reduces power.



Fair enough, but on the rich side of peak the power curve (vs fuel flow)
is fairly flat, so power differences are relatively minor. On the lean
side it drops much more quickly.




randall g =%^) PPASEL+Night 1974 Cardinal RG
http://www.telemark.net/randallg
Lots of aerial photographs of British Columbia at:
http://www.telemark.net/randallg/photos.htm
Vancouver's famous Kat Kam: http://www.katkam.ca
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Towing Roger Fowler Soaring 6 August 11th 05 04:25 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 2nd 03 03:07 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.