If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:575932e0-ef5f-4870-be93-43f2005fc961 @s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com: On Mar 15, 1:27 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Vaughn Simon wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Chuck Yeager wasn't the first through the sound barrier :-)) Yes, but how many of those who preceeded Chuck through the sound barrier lived to tell about it? Vaughn Actually, the guy who did it did it just the week before Yeager and he most certainly did live to tell about it. He finally lost his life in a crash during the F100 program while working as a test pilot for NORTH AMERICAN Aviation. There's some debate on that, isn't there? Some suspicion of compressibility? Bertie There will always be debate on it due to the various issues that surrounded the incident, but the word is rock solid that Welsh broke the barrier the week prior to Yeager's attempt in the X1 if you dig deep enough. Welsh said he was going to attempt it the week before in the prototype F86, and he had a ton of witnesses sitting at the bar at Pancho's who heard it when he went through. The AF squelched it due to considerations in play with Bell at the time, but there is general acceptance in the flight est community that Welch did indeed bust through on his last dive of the day. His flight test data card wasn't programmed for the high Mach dive and he did it on his own call. Yeager has known that Welsh broke the barrier since day one as he knew almost everybody who was at Pancho's that day,and has to my knowledge anyway, just let it slide as he rode an entire career on his "reputation". Officially, the AF I believe revised Yeager's X1 flight to say he wa the first to break Mach one in LEVEL FLIGHT. The "debate" will probably go on forever, but Welsh was the man!! I read a few years back that the russians may have done it in 46 in something they captured from the germans. what it was I do not know, but they weren't interested in advertising it since it wasn't a russian aircraft. I think they got ahold of the TA183 and it may have been that. They did seem to have a fascination for that design as reflected by some of their own efforts, particularly Lavotchkin and Mig. If anything should have been capable it would have been the TA 183. No stab trim though AFAIK. Well, as much as I respect the work of Kurt Tank, I don't think he made it through Mach 1 with the TA183. There was a ton of fuselage drag on that thing. Even the Mig 15 which a lot of people believe was loosely based on Tank's design, couldn't get through Mach 1. The "barrel planes" just had too much parasite drag . This having been said, I never quite get to the point on these things where I never say never :-)) Those were highly secretive times, but the basic designs don't pass muster with the guys I know who crack the numbers on the supersonic math :-)) We'll have to ask Tucker. I'm sure he has the answer :-)) Dudley Henriques Ok Mr. Dud, It seems probable to me that a Me-163 could exceed Mach 1 in a dive, and likely did. Nope, you're an idiot. Bertie I wonder if Mr. Tucker realizes that by the time the 163 got high enough to "dive" it became a glider :-)) By the time Tucker gets high enough to dive he bcomes a boob. Bertie Yeah, but I believe he has a head start! :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
Dudley Henriques wrote in news:3LudnfZqkqMG-
: By the time Tucker gets high enough to dive he bcomes a boob. Bertie Yeah, but I believe he has a head start! :-) You gotta wonder how someone gets that stupid, really Bertie |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
On Mar 15, 4:06 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:575932e0-ef5f-4870-be93-43f2005fc961 @s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com: On Mar 15, 1:27 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Vaughn Simon wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message news:dO2dnVi2FNM4b0banZ2dnUVZ_rbinZ2d@rc n.net... Chuck Yeager wasn't the first through the sound barrier :-)) Yes, but how many of those who preceeded Chuck through the sound barrier lived to tell about it? Vaughn Actually, the guy who did it did it just the week before Yeager and he most certainly did live to tell about it. He finally lost his life in a crash during the F100 program while working as a test pilot for NORTH AMERICAN Aviation. There's some debate on that, isn't there? Some suspicion of compressibility? Bertie There will always be debate on it due to the various issues that surrounded the incident, but the word is rock solid that Welsh broke the barrier the week prior to Yeager's attempt in the X1 if you dig deep enough. Welsh said he was going to attempt it the week before in the prototype F86, and he had a ton of witnesses sitting at the bar at Pancho's who heard it when he went through. The AF squelched it due to considerations in play with Bell at the time, but there is general acceptance in the flight est community that Welch did indeed bust through on his last dive of the day. His flight test data card wasn't programmed for the high Mach dive and he did it on his own call. Yeager has known that Welsh broke the barrier since day one as he knew almost everybody who was at Pancho's that day,and has to my knowledge anyway, just let it slide as he rode an entire career on his "reputation". Officially, the AF I believe revised Yeager's X1 flight to say he wa the first to break Mach one in LEVEL FLIGHT. The "debate" will probably go on forever, but Welsh was the man!! I read a few years back that the russians may have done it in 46 in something they captured from the germans. what it was I do not know, but they weren't interested in advertising it since it wasn't a russian aircraft. I think they got ahold of the TA183 and it may have been that. They did seem to have a fascination for that design as reflected by some of their own efforts, particularly Lavotchkin and Mig. If anything should have been capable it would have been the TA 183. No stab trim though AFAIK. Well, as much as I respect the work of Kurt Tank, I don't think he made it through Mach 1 with the TA183. There was a ton of fuselage drag on that thing. Even the Mig 15 which a lot of people believe was loosely based on Tank's design, couldn't get through Mach 1. The "barrel planes" just had too much parasite drag . This having been said, I never quite get to the point on these things where I never say never :-)) Those were highly secretive times, but the basic designs don't pass muster with the guys I know who crack the numbers on the supersonic math :-)) We'll have to ask Tucker. I'm sure he has the answer :-)) Dudley Henriques Ok Mr. Dud, It seems probable to me that a Me-163 could exceed Mach 1 in a dive, and likely did. Nope, you're an idiot. Bertie I wonder if Mr. Tucker realizes that by the time the 163 got high enough to "dive" it became a glider :-)) By the time Tucker gets high enough to dive he bcomes a boob. Bertie Yeah, but I believe he has a head start! :-) Hey Dud, bertie is an outright ****ing queer, I've noticed you kiss his asshole alot, why? Anyway, the Me-163C was certainly able to do Mach+ in a shallow dive. Hell, even the twinky straight winged CF-100 could do that with junky canucky jets, and canux knew ****-all about flying (still don't). - Dudley Henriques One of the reasons why I pulled your last star is because you're an ass-kisser as bertie demo'd. Ken |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
: On Mar 15, 4:06 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:575932e0-ef5f-4870-be93-43f2005fc961 @s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com: On Mar 15, 1:27 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Vaughn Simon wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message news:dO2dnVi2FNM4b0banZ2dnUVZ_rbinZ2d@rc n.net... Chuck Yeager wasn't the first through the sound barrier :-)) Yes, but how many of those who preceeded Chuck through the sound barrier lived to tell about it? Vaughn Actually, the guy who did it did it just the week before Yeager and he most certainly did live to tell about it. He finally lost his life in a crash during the F100 program while working as a test pilot for NORTH AMERICAN Aviation. There's some debate on that, isn't there? Some suspicion of compressibility? Bertie There will always be debate on it due to the various issues that surrounded the incident, but the word is rock solid that Welsh broke the barrier the week prior to Yeager's attempt in the X1 if you dig deep enough. Welsh said he was going to attempt it the week before in the prototype F86, and he had a ton of witnesses sitting at the bar at Pancho's who heard it when he went through. The AF squelched it due to considerations in play with Bell at the time, but there is general acceptance in the flight est community that Welch did indeed bust through on his last dive of the day. His flight test data card wasn't programmed for the high Mach dive and he did it on his own call. Yeager has known that Welsh broke the barrier since day one as he knew almost everybody who was at Pancho's that day,and has to my knowledge anyway, just let it slide as he rode an entire career on his "reputation". Officially, the AF I believe revised Yeager's X1 flight to say he wa the first to break Mach one in LEVEL FLIGHT. The "debate" will probably go on forever, but Welsh was the man!! I read a few years back that the russians may have done it in 46 in something they captured from the germans. what it was I do not know, but they weren't interested in advertising it since it wasn't a russian aircraft. I think they got ahold of the TA183 and it may have been that. They did seem to have a fascination for that design as reflected by some of their own efforts, particularly Lavotchkin and Mig. If anything should have been capable it would have been the TA 183. No stab trim though AFAIK. Well, as much as I respect the work of Kurt Tank, I don't think he made it through Mach 1 with the TA183. There was a ton of fuselage drag on that thing. Even the Mig 15 which a lot of people believe was loosely based on Tank's design, couldn't get through Mach 1. The "barrel planes" just had too much parasite drag . This having been said, I never quite get to the point on these things where I never say never :-)) Those were highly secretive times, but the basic designs don't pass muster with the guys I know who crack the numbers on the supersonic math :-)) We'll have to ask Tucker. I'm sure he has the answer :-)) Dudley Henriques Ok Mr. Dud, It seems probable to me that a Me-163 could exceed Mach 1 in a dive, and likely did. Nope, you're an idiot. Bertie I wonder if Mr. Tucker realizes that by the time the 163 got high enough to "dive" it became a glider :-)) By the time Tucker gets high enough to dive he bcomes a boob. Bertie Yeah, but I believe he has a head start! :-) Hey Dud, bertie is an outright ****ing queer, I've noticed you kiss his asshole alot, why? Anyway, the Me-163C was certainly able to do Mach+ in a shallow dive. No, it wasn;t, fjukkwit. Hell, even the twinky straight winged CF-100 could do that with junky canucky jets, and canux knew ****-all about flying (still don't). You're an idiot. - Dudley Henriques One of the reasons why I pulled your last star is because you're an ass-kisser as bertie demo'd. You must be gutted Dudley. Bertie |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Mar 15, 4:06 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:575932e0-ef5f-4870-be93-43f2005fc961 @s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com: On Mar 15, 1:27 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Vaughn Simon wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Chuck Yeager wasn't the first through the sound barrier :-)) Yes, but how many of those who preceeded Chuck through the sound barrier lived to tell about it? Vaughn Actually, the guy who did it did it just the week before Yeager and he most certainly did live to tell about it. He finally lost his life in a crash during the F100 program while working as a test pilot for NORTH AMERICAN Aviation. There's some debate on that, isn't there? Some suspicion of compressibility? Bertie There will always be debate on it due to the various issues that surrounded the incident, but the word is rock solid that Welsh broke the barrier the week prior to Yeager's attempt in the X1 if you dig deep enough. Welsh said he was going to attempt it the week before in the prototype F86, and he had a ton of witnesses sitting at the bar at Pancho's who heard it when he went through. The AF squelched it due to considerations in play with Bell at the time, but there is general acceptance in the flight est community that Welch did indeed bust through on his last dive of the day. His flight test data card wasn't programmed for the high Mach dive and he did it on his own call. Yeager has known that Welsh broke the barrier since day one as he knew almost everybody who was at Pancho's that day,and has to my knowledge anyway, just let it slide as he rode an entire career on his "reputation". Officially, the AF I believe revised Yeager's X1 flight to say he wa the first to break Mach one in LEVEL FLIGHT. The "debate" will probably go on forever, but Welsh was the man!! I read a few years back that the russians may have done it in 46 in something they captured from the germans. what it was I do not know, but they weren't interested in advertising it since it wasn't a russian aircraft. I think they got ahold of the TA183 and it may have been that. They did seem to have a fascination for that design as reflected by some of their own efforts, particularly Lavotchkin and Mig. If anything should have been capable it would have been the TA 183. No stab trim though AFAIK. Well, as much as I respect the work of Kurt Tank, I don't think he made it through Mach 1 with the TA183. There was a ton of fuselage drag on that thing. Even the Mig 15 which a lot of people believe was loosely based on Tank's design, couldn't get through Mach 1. The "barrel planes" just had too much parasite drag . This having been said, I never quite get to the point on these things where I never say never :-)) Those were highly secretive times, but the basic designs don't pass muster with the guys I know who crack the numbers on the supersonic math :-)) We'll have to ask Tucker. I'm sure he has the answer :-)) Dudley Henriques Ok Mr. Dud, It seems probable to me that a Me-163 could exceed Mach 1 in a dive, and likely did. Nope, you're an idiot. Bertie I wonder if Mr. Tucker realizes that by the time the 163 got high enough to "dive" it became a glider :-)) By the time Tucker gets high enough to dive he bcomes a boob. Bertie Yeah, but I believe he has a head start! :-) Hey Dud, bertie is an outright ****ing queer, I've noticed you kiss his asshole alot, why? Anyway, the Me-163C was certainly able to do Mach+ in a shallow dive. Hell, even the twinky straight winged CF-100 could do that with junky canucky jets, and canux knew ****-all about flying (still don't). - Dudley Henriques One of the reasons why I pulled your last star is because you're an ass-kisser as bertie demo'd. Ken I've noticed your language seems to get worse the more wrong you are Ken :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
On Mar 16, 12:56 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
I've noticed your language seems to get worse the more wrong you are Ken :-) The gay reference is somewhat similar to invoking the Godwin .. He loses |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
george wrote:
On Mar 16, 12:56 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: I've noticed your language seems to get worse the more wrong you are Ken :-) The gay reference is somewhat similar to invoking the Godwin .. He loses "Reductio_ad_Hitlerum" :-)) -- Dudley Henriques |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:55:55 -0400, "Peter Dohm" wrote: "Roger" wrote in message .. . --------some snipped---------- Yup and half standard when you get any where near the airport. (Time for a PARg) I had wonderedl whether those were even still available. I rarely see them listed, but the nearby commercial airport was still issuing them on request. At one time when I was flying in there quite often I'd regularly get requests to fly a PAR for a trainee controller. Flying one when you can see is more difficult than flying one when you can't. You almost invariably try to fly it as your eyes tell you instead of what the controller says. Of course watching them on the instruments really means you have to fight your instincts. A beginner can have you S-turning across the localizer all the way down the GS. They've always been pretty close on the GS. Peter Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Yeager has known that Welsh broke the barrier since day one as he knew almost everybody who was at Pancho's that day,and has to my knowledge anyway, just let it slide as he rode an entire career on his "reputation". Officially, the AF I believe revised Yeager's X1 flight to say he wa the first to break Mach one in LEVEL FLIGHT. The "debate" will probably go on forever, but Welsh was the man!! -- Dudley Henriques Level flight is the key here... There was apparently also someone who made it through in a prop fighter diving, got lucky and pulled it out... |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
Turn to Final - Keeping Ball Centered
"Blueskies" wrote in message ... There was apparently also someone who made it through in a prop fighter diving, got lucky and pulled it out... If you were to do a literature search, you would probably find many making that claim. It is one of those things that can never be proven one way or another, so the claims will go on forever. More to the point, (and brazenly contributing to the subject drift) has anyone ever broken the sound barrier in any prop plane in a verifiable and repeatable manner? Vaughn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implications of.....keeping the speed up | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 48 | January 14th 07 11:41 PM |
Gamepad, stopping throttle axis from being auto-centered | DenisK | Simulators | 1 | December 20th 06 09:16 AM |
Keeping a builders log | Lou | Home Built | 24 | January 28th 06 10:46 PM |
Thanks for ideas on drilling a centered hole! | Scott | Home Built | 12 | October 25th 04 02:52 AM |
Keeping Me Out of Your Warbird? | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 47 | February 12th 04 04:34 PM |