If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
es330td writes:
This brings up an interesting wrinkle then as GPS altitude info is not dependent on external pressure so pilots must be careful to ignore that info if available. As stated before, in Class A everyone sets their altimeter to 29.92 so that as long as everyone is wrong together everything is okay. Adding GPS info into the mix splits the groups into two; one that is wrong together at 29.92 and another that is right at actual altitude. GPS is too inaccurate for most purposes in vertical positioning, anyway. It is not designed to determine altitude with a high degree of accuracy, and can easily be hundreds of feet off. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
In article ,
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote: In theory you could use GPS altitudes when flying MSL/QNH setting, because both systems measure absolute altitued, so you would expect them to be the same. If GPS could be relied upon that is. Unfortunately it cannot, GPS altitued measurements are unrealiable and can drift wildly (as opposed to GPS 2D positioning which is quite accurate). Traditional altimeters are much better. as a rule of thumb, regular SPS GPS altitude error is roughly 50% greater than the horizontal error. The advantage of traditional altimeters is realized when everyone is using them (and the same setting). Note that above FL290 traditional altimeters errors increase to the point where separations were increased to 2000' vertical separations (except for RVSM airspace) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
On Nov 24, 8:38*am, Robert Moore wrote:
es330td wrote Just an extra point....above the transition altitude/level, we fly a Flight Level, not an Altitude. Thanks for the reminder. I hope someday to have to care about that. :-) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
es330td wrote
On Nov 24, 8:38*am, Robert Moore wrote: es330td wrote Just an extra point....above the transition altitude/level, we fly a Flight Level, not an Altitude. Thanks for the reminder. I hope someday to have to care about that. :-) Just remember.... on the way up, it's Transition Altitude, on the way down, it's Transition Level. :-) Bob Moore ATP CFI PanAm(retired) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
In article ,
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote: Bob Noel wrote in : as a rule of thumb, regular SPS GPS altitude error is roughly 50% greater than the horizontal error. That would be minimal. But IME, while most of the time it's fairly accurate, it can sometimes go wild. For example I was cross-countrying at 3,500ish ft, when suddenly the GPS went through 3,000 2,500 ... 4,500 4,000 and then settled down at 3,500 once again as if nothing had happend. It all lasted just a couple of seconds. It had not lost coverage, that would be indicated by an error screen and the map animation stopping which it did not; model GPS Pilot III. I understand this is normal behaviour. If so, GPS altitude measurements are completely unreliable. A properly operating GPS receiver, with 4 SVs in view in an appropriate geometry, should not report such extreme altitude variations. What is unknown: exactly how the GPS Pilot III selects SVs, whether or not it will require 4 in view or let altitude "drift" in order to maintain a 2D solution by using just 3 SVs, whether or not it will report outages/drops within a few seconds, whether or not it performs reasonableness checks on solutions. I assume the GPS Pilot III doesn't have RAIM or FDE |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
Bob Noel writes:
as a rule of thumb, regular SPS GPS altitude error is roughly 50% greater than the horizontal error. GPS altitude error is enormous, sometimes two orders of magnitude greater than lateral error. It's completely unreliable. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
Mxsmanic wrote:
Bob Noel writes: as a rule of thumb, regular SPS GPS altitude error is roughly 50% greater than the horizontal error. GPS altitude error is enormous, sometimes two orders of magnitude greater than lateral error. It's completely unreliable. Wrong yet again. Two orders of magnitude means 100 times. The GPS specification with SA on is 100 m lateral, 150 m vertical, which is 1.5 times. GPS measured accuracy with SA off is 2.5 m lateral, 4.7 m vertical, which is 1.9 times. WASS specification is 7.6 m lateral, 7.6 m vertical, which is 1 times. WASS measured accuracy is 0.9 m lateral, 1.3 m vertical, which is 1.4 times. In all cases, altitude error is less than 2 times lateral error. It looks as though we can add GPS and simple arithmetic to the list of things which you pontificate about yet know nothing about. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on high altitude pressures
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: Two orders of magnitude means 100 times. Yes, I know. The GPS specification with SA on is 100 m lateral, 150 m vertical, which is 1.5 times. SA has been off for years. Yes, that at least is correct. The point is that even with SA, GPS accuracy is pretty good and has nowhere near 2 orders of magnitude altitude error compared to lateral as you stated. GPS measured accuracy with SA off is 2.5 m lateral, 4.7 m vertical, which is 1.9 times. The vertical accuracy is far worse than 4.7 metres. Absolutely wrong. See the the data: http://users.erols.com/dlwilson/gpswaas.htm GPS with SA off, vertical error: No WAAS 50% 3.0 m Mean 3.6 m RMS 4.5 m With WAAS: 50% 2.2 m Mean 2.6 m RMS 3.2 m A quick Google (source of all your knowledge) finds numerous sites with similar data. You are wrong, wrong, wrong once again. It looks as though we can add GPS and simple arithmetic to the list of things which you pontificate about yet know nothing about. Be sure to fly IFR sometime in IMC with GPS as your altimeter, and you'll see what I mean. If you knew anything about real flying, you would know that you NEVER use GPS as your altimeter under ANY circumstances for reasons entirely unlrelated to GPS accuracy. But how would you know as you have never been in a real airplane with a real altimeter and a real GPS? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High Altitude Waypoints | Dennis Johnson | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | May 2nd 08 02:44 AM |
High Altitude Linnies | TTaylor at cc.usu.edu | Soaring | 4 | August 4th 06 10:47 PM |
High altitude & RPM | abripl | Home Built | 1 | September 1st 05 12:12 AM |
High-altitude autorotations? | Bill McClain | Military Aviation | 17 | March 15th 04 04:23 PM |
Low and high altitude airways | David Megginson | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | September 9th 03 01:18 AM |