If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Matt Giwer wrote in
: Jordan wrote: Matt Giwer wrote: Dean A. Markley wrote: Israel need not hit Damascus. All they need do is hit Assad's house near Latakia with a 2000 lb bomb. How does that act of war improve matters? By demonstrating to the Syrians that when they commit acts of war against Israel through third party clients, Syria will suffer _direct_ retaliation. Resistance to occupation is lawful and not an act of war EVEN IF there were evidence of the implicit assertion that Syria were sponsoring it. Capturing a prisoner of war from the occupying power is lawful in international law. Their only obligation is to allow Red Cross visits along with proper treatment in accordance with his rank. And when has that ever happened? The ICRC won't get to see the latest abductee and you know it. He will be murdered in contravention of the laws of war. And-uh sneaking into Israel proper isn't allowed. Were it an attack by regular forces of the Palestinian authority that would be one thing but then it would be open war and that is something the Paleosimians cannot afford. In any case the Paleosimians have made their bed and will have to lie in it. Well they lie anyway its just now they have to do it from a horizontal position. IBM |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
"Big Red" wrote in
oups.com: 1. Trim your responses. Israel. It would ammount to sucide. 2. When has this ever stopped them? IBM |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Matt Giwer wrote in
: [snip] Israelis are so professionally (but not really) paranoid that it proclaims a Well given their hostile neighbourhood its small wonder they are.... child throwing a stone at a tank a threat to its existence and then murders the child for it with a sniper a few days later. Not because he did it but because the picture of throwing the stone was caught on camera. Palestinians are not permitted to have role models. Child with a stone? Ever seen some of these "children with stones"? A teenager with a a four foot sling launching heavy projectiles can do serious damage. By me, taking such an individual out with a rifle bullet is A-OK. IBM |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Jordan wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote: Jordan wrote: wrote: Change the date and ethnic group for a fun experience. Pre-World War 2 Germany did try to expel Jews. Were the Jews, as a group, in pre-World War 2 Germany carrying out a murderous terrorist campaign aganst the non-Jewish Germans? Their property had not been stolen at that time so they did not have the lawful right to use deadly force to regain it. The originally Arab land that the Zionists originally built their settlements on was stolen by the _Turks_, The OTTOMANs did not steal the land. They only ruled it. That is the answer the Sultan gave the Zionist appeal lead by Herzl to GIVE them Palestine, "I only rule the land. I do not own it." It is the obvious answer. It was not his to give. It shows just how far back the Zionists held the communist confabulation of sovereignty with ownership. First they came for the communists and we never thanked them. BTW: Have you ever come across the reason why Israel's original efforts to get Stalin as its international pretector fell through? not the Jews (and certainly not the "Israelis," as Israel did not exist at the time). The Zionists purchased the land from the _Turks_. Something between two and three percent was actually purchased. Some put it as low as 1%. All the rest was stolen from its rightful owners who have every moral and human right to reclaim it by any means available including deadly force. If the Palestinians really cared about equity, they would be trying to get compensation from _Turkey_ for the lands, As you are ignorant of history, even Zionist history, law and sovereignty you have no informed opinion on the subject. instead of trying to murder Jewish civilians. As to civilians, as I have noted, any member of the IDF on or off duty, active or reserve is a lawful target. It would be improbably bad luck not to injure one of them in a crowd. That is why the conventions of war say in effect, if the military is among civilians they put the civilians at risk and the attackers are not liable for civilian casualties. Israel says EXACTLY the same thing when dozens of civilians are murdered in the process of murdering an alledged "terrorist." As to Jewish civilians 20% of Israel is non-Jewish and as Israel is not a segregated country one in five of those killed is on average not jewish. So either stop whining about Jews or be prepared to defend segregation in Israel. -- If the a href="http://www.ussliberty.org"attack on the Liberty/a was a mistake, it is possible to mistake OJ Simpson for Britney Spears in broad daylight. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3649 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml Zionism http://www.giwersworld.org/disinfo/disinfo.phtml a4 |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Robert Kolker wrote in
: Jordan wrote: If the Israelis had done this after 1967-72, there would have been _no_ "Palestinian issue," and by now there would be very little international concern about the descendants of said "Palestinians," who would have long since integrated into whatever countries they wound up living in. In whatever country Palestineans dwell they are a pox and a nuisance. Recall what happened in Lebanon. They were also a pain in the arse in Kuwait where some of them worked. They were not particularly loved by their Muslim "brothers". Particularly in Iraq these days... IBM |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Matt Giwer wrote: I have never been off-topic in s.h.w-i. We have been over that many times and no one has produced a single example of it. I did not post one word in this thread until you posted. That I deal with real history regarding WWII and you deal accept Allied proganda as what happened regarding WWII is a long-standing disagreement and will likely never be resolved. Matt, I actually wasn't talking about you. I disagree with you regarding the Holocaust and the role of Jews in European and Mideastern history, but you've never attempted to do real harm to those you debate with. That puts your moral standing at least one order of magnitude above scumbags like Carlos Yu, who tried to get people he didn't like fired from their jobs, and hacked into accounts; or Douglas Muir, who made fraudulent bids on my items on eBay in order to damage my account there. You grasp the basic concept that speech is not harm; they don't. If I met you IRL I'd treat you politely; I can't say the same thing for them. Sincerely Yours, Jordan |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Robert Kolker wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote: As I said, the boy in the picture was murdered by an Israeli sniper. That is what is called cold-blooded murder. So are the single shots that enter classrooms to murder students. It happens all the time, especially in Unganda. A new low even for you. The IDF is no better than Ugandan militias. I notice you have not one word to say about Hutus and Tutsis who are several orders of magnitude more brutal than the Zionists you love to hate. And the Israeles are no better than Hutus. I do not recall that subject ever coming up in this newsgroup. But if you would like, the Hutus do not claim to have the most moral army in the world. They do not even claim to have a moral army. If the Israelis were as bad as you say, there would not be a single Palestinean left alive in Gaza City tonite. The night isn't over. But everyone that dies from lack of electricity, water, food, medicine or any other cause related to this siege or the occupation in general has been murdered by Israel. As such deaths are mostly among children and the elderly it is going to be a very unpleasant accounting to Israel's already blood-drenched scorecard. That is why group punishment is a war crime punishable by hanging. -- No democracy has the right to keep secret facts which could materially affect any election. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3646 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml http://www.giwersworld.org |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Jarg wrote:
Good point. Pretty much every country that exists today was created at someone elses expense, often displacing groups that had previously displaced other groups, and on and on... The human race is a nasty species. We are the baddest smartest apes in The Monkey House. Bob Kolker |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Jarg wrote:
Then we can allow the tribes the opportunity to sort out which one was where first, although that would seem problematic given their lack of written history. I want the coffin and burial shroud concession when that happens. By the way, if we did give it back to the Indians, within thirty years it would all be back in the same hands. Bob Kolker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 9th 04 11:25 PM |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 07:31 PM |
NO MORE WAR FOR ISRAEL | MORRIS434 | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 4th 04 03:10 PM |
NO MORE WAR FOR ISRAEL | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | April 4th 04 03:09 PM |
Israel pays the price for buying only Boeing (and not Airbus) | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 57 | July 8th 03 12:23 AM |