If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
Curious if the fine folks at Cambridge have ever thought about what it
would take software wise to give the user the option to select from a variety of vario climb/sink/cruise tones. I'm not suggesting a radical departure in the indication of the tone (increasing beeping for climb), but the background tone that is used. I like my 302, but I'd sure like the option for a tone that wasn't quite so harsh Obviously the ultimate would be the ability of the owner to download the equivalent of a ringtone for the various sounds.... Just a thought... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
On Aug 25, 6:55*pm, Mark wrote:
Curious if the fine folks at Cambridge have ever thought about what it would take software wise to give the user the option to select from a variety of vario climb/sink/cruise tones. *I'm not suggesting a radical departure in the indication of the tone (increasing beeping for climb), but the background tone that is used. *I like my 302, but I'd sure like the option for a tone that wasn't quite so harsh Obviously the ultimate would be the ability of the owner to download the equivalent of a ringtone for the various sounds.... Just a thought... The fine folks at Cambridge who could have done this are now at NK. Lets see what features the new NK Vario will have. They really ought to be releasing specs. Won't damage their current vario sales (NK have none) so unclear what not releasing at least basic details gives. But not doing so certainly avoids having to deal with annoying potential customer feedback. Darryl |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
On Aug 26, 7:16*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Aug 25, 6:55*pm, Mark wrote: Curious if the fine folks at Cambridge have ever thought about what it would take software wise to give the user the option to select from a variety of vario climb/sink/cruise tones. *I'm not suggesting a radical departure in the indication of the tone (increasing beeping for climb), but the background tone that is used. *I like my 302, but I'd sure like the option for a tone that wasn't quite so harsh Obviously the ultimate would be the ability of the owner to download the equivalent of a ringtone for the various sounds.... Just a thought... The fine folks at Cambridge who could have done this are now at NK. Lets see what features the new NK Vario will have. They really ought to be releasing specs. Won't damage their current vario sales (NK have none) so unclear what not releasing at least basic details gives. But not doing so certainly avoids having to deal with annoying potential customer feedback. Darryl I really enjoy my 302, but it would be great if one could have a choice of 'ring'tones |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
The fine folks at Cambridge who could have done this are now at NK. Darryl If you are suggesting that there is no one doing software development on the 302 at Cambridge, then perhaps they should/could consider an open source concept... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:15:23 -0700, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Tim may have other concerns, but one problem is that secure flight recorders use a private/public key signing mechanism (e.g. DSA). An open source development project could not expose the private key. However I don't see why this automatically makes this impossible in principle, there could be schemes where a private key is held in escrow and not disclosed even to the developers. The developers and hardware manufactuer would also have to organize to have software releases IGC approved. Do you mean secure in the sense of not being able to tamper with a signed, downloaded trace without it being easily detectable? -- Alex |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
On Aug 26, 8:11*am, Alex Potter wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:15:23 -0700, Darryl Ramm wrote: Tim may have other concerns, but one problem is that secure flight recorders use a private/public key signing mechanism (e.g. DSA). An open source development project could not expose the private key. However I don't see why this automatically makes this impossible in principle, there could be schemes where a private key is held in escrow and not disclosed even to the developers. The developers and hardware manufactuer would also have to organize to have software releases IGC approved. Do you mean secure in the sense of not being able to tamper with a signed, downloaded trace without it being easily detectable? -- Alex Yes. Anybody with the private key can sit at their computer make up an entirely fake flight or edit an existing flight (e.g. take out a restricted airspace incursion) and resign the IGC file and nobody would be able to tell. Darryl Darryl |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
On Aug 26, 7:15*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:
The C302 has several features (e.g. use of accelerometer hardware) that were kicked around but never shipped I thinks it's true to say that the accelerometers were never included in the vario function. However I'm quite sure that nomal accel is used for the slow speed warning. Andy (GY) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:25:25 -0700, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Yes. Anybody with the private key can sit at their computer make up an entirely fake flight or edit an existing flight (e.g. take out a restricted airspace incursion) and resign the IGC file and nobody would be able to tell. I don't think this runs as an argument. The downloaded file is, as far as I understand it, signed by the "logger", rather than by the downloader's computer, which makes checking for "fiddling" quite easy. The developers can invent any key-pair they choose. The keys used in the instrument will have been be hard-coded, therefore the private key is already in the user's possession, even though hard, if not impossible(!?) to read... Potential cheats would need some considerable technical skill as well as criminal(?) intent. Do such people fly gliders? -- Alex |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:36:11 +0100, Tim Newport-Peace wrote:
Not exactly. the Private key is held in the 302 in volatile memory that is corrupted when the box is opened, and can only be loaded into the 302 using software only held by Cambridge. More I will not say. Thanks for the clarification. I can understand your wish to say no more on that subject. Would you care to share your reasons for not opening the source code for the logger itself? No reason nor necessity to share the key-store mechanism, I'd have thought? Potential cheats would need some considerable technical skill as well as criminal(?) intent. Do such people fly gliders? Well, yes. There well known examples of cheating attempts both in Record Claims and World Championships. A pity. Always one or two, I suppose. -- Alex |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
302 audio
On Aug 26, 1:45*am, Sven wrote:
I really enjoy my 302, but it would be great if one could have a choice of 'ring'tones- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hmmmm . . . perhaps some of that Meg Ryan sound track for lift?? :c) for those who don't remember, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nNhOH4Y0bI bumper zz Quiet Vent and MKIV "high tech" yaw string |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAV 11 Audio Vario/no Audio ideas? (Cambridge) | Gregg Leslie[_2_] | Soaring | 3 | June 4th 11 12:08 AM |
Audio Highlights while owning N1943L - Audio only with text | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | May 1st 10 03:07 AM |
B 50 audio problems | Vsoars | Soaring | 6 | January 4th 08 04:08 PM |
L-13 + TE + Audio Vario | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 4 | January 12th 05 03:21 AM |
RST-565 Audio Panel | Jim Weir | Owning | 0 | October 29th 04 08:57 PM |