Leaving Usnet Groups, Bye

Dudley Henriques wrote:


"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:


"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:


"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:


The first thing you learn in flying is NEVER to put much faith in
general analogies. They don't work for various reasons.
On Usenet, the old "ignore them" analogy usually ends up right back
out here on Usenet, being laid out by someone for someone else, as
nothing more than absolute proof that the analogy doesn't work in
the first place.
:-)
No my friend....unfortunately it's man's basic flaws and individual
personalities that will determine how communication is carried out
on Usenet, not the old "ignore um" analogy.
But it sounds good anyway :-)))))

Dudley Henriques


Dudley,

When you use the word "analogy" do you mean, like, "rule of thumb" or
"method"?

Just asking.

--
Saville

Sorry. I can't imagine...

Don't sell yourself short, Dudley; you've exhibited a vibrant and
highly
creative imagination.

.....you "just asking" me anything,

Believe me...setups utterly unecessary.


Sorry, your post has nothing to do with aviation.


Neither did your response to my question (my question did have something
to
do with aviation).



--
Saville

Well then, as of THIS post, consider anything written by me to you as
whatever you wish it to be.
Starting today; new game!

NEW *game*? Fascinating....

Well that's good because you've replied to dozens of non-aviation entries,
with non-aviation replies, especially just in the last few days. So we know
you, in fact, have no problem replying to non-aviation threads, in reality.


.................and your question or statement concerning flying
is............................?

It's a question about a flying statement you made:

You wrote (you can see it above):

The first thing you learn in flying is NEVER to put much faith in
general analogies. They don't work for various reasons.

I want to understand what you mean by the word "analogies" when used in this
statement about flying.

My question was and is:

When you use the word "analogy" do you mean, like, "rule of thumb" or
"method"?

Or did you really mean the "A is to B as B is to C" sort of thing?

And, clearly, I mean the specific use of the word above, as regards to
flying.



--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
ink.net...
The problem with people like me ( not that I'm anything special) is that
I'm in print enough throughout the world that there are many in aviation
who recognize the name. Although It's true the average poster on Usenet
wouldn't know if the person posting with this name was actually me, there
are enough people out here both in my profession and on Usenet who
actually know me personally that it's not all that hard to put the post to
the name.


I can tel when it's you not by looking at the properties of the message, but
rather the content. You have a body of knowledge most of us lack. I don't
believe it can be faked.


It is a bit different for people on Usenet who use their real names than
it is for the pseudonym posters. Actually, as I have said many times, if I
had it to do over again, I would not have come to Usenet as Dudley
Henriques.


I long ago came to the same conclusion, hence the Mortimer Schnerd moniker.
Obviously, that's not my real name but I am accessible through it. I don't
keep my real name a secret with email... only in Usenet.


Mortimer Schnerd, RN

This is a pasted in reply.

................new game...my rules;

................and your statement or question concerning flying is?

Dudley Henriques

"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:


"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:


"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:


"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:


The first thing you learn in flying is NEVER to put much faith in
general analogies. They don't work for various reasons.
On Usenet, the old "ignore them" analogy usually ends up right back
out here on Usenet, being laid out by someone for someone else, as
nothing more than absolute proof that the analogy doesn't work in
the first place.
:-)
No my friend....unfortunately it's man's basic flaws and individual
personalities that will determine how communication is carried out
on Usenet, not the old "ignore um" analogy.
But it sounds good anyway :-)))))

Dudley Henriques


Dudley,

When you use the word "analogy" do you mean, like, "rule of thumb"
or
"method"?

Just asking.

--
Saville

Sorry. I can't imagine...

Don't sell yourself short, Dudley; you've exhibited a vibrant and
highly
creative imagination.

.....you "just asking" me anything,

Believe me...setups utterly unecessary.


Sorry, your post has nothing to do with aviation.


Neither did your response to my question (my question did have something
to
do with aviation).



--
Saville

Well then, as of THIS post, consider anything written by me to you as
whatever you wish it to be.
Starting today; new game!

NEW *game*? Fascinating....

Well that's good because you've replied to dozens of non-aviation entries,
with non-aviation replies, especially just in the last few days. So we
know
you, in fact, have no problem replying to non-aviation threads, in
reality.


.................and your question or statement concerning flying
is............................?

It's a question about a flying statement you made:

You wrote (you can see it above):

The first thing you learn in flying is NEVER to put much faith in
general analogies. They don't work for various reasons.

I want to understand what you mean by the word "analogies" when used in
this
statement about flying.

My question was and is:

When you use the word "analogy" do you mean, like, "rule of thumb" or
"method"?

Or did you really mean the "A is to B as B is to C" sort of thing?

And, clearly, I mean the specific use of the word above, as regards to
flying.



--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm

"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message
news:ON2fe.2579$sy6.393@lakeread04...

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
ink.net...
The problem with people like me ( not that I'm anything special) is that
I'm in print enough throughout the world that there are many in aviation
who recognize the name. Although It's true the average poster on Usenet
wouldn't know if the person posting with this name was actually me, there
are enough people out here both in my profession and on Usenet who
actually know me personally that it's not all that hard to put the post
to the name.


I can tel when it's you not by looking at the properties of the message,
but rather the content. You have a body of knowledge most of us lack. I
don't believe it can be faked.

I believe the legitimate pilots on these groups, especially the ones who
have lived through a career or have spent their lives in aviation in one
form or another each have a unique experience to bring to the information
table. I as well believe these pilots for the most part recognize each other
through just the process you have described above; the quality of
information that's passed back and forth through posting. They know it's
fact because they have lived the fact...in one form or another.
These pilots have no problems at all with each other on Usenet.
After all is said and done with the rest of what one has to put up with from
the trolls and idiots on these groups, it's only the recognition and
acceptance of the people "in the know" for each other that keeps the groups
alive.


It is a bit different for people on Usenet who use their real names than
it is for the pseudonym posters. Actually, as I have said many times, if
I had it to do over again, I would not have come to Usenet as Dudley
Henriques.


I long ago came to the same conclusion, hence the Mortimer Schnerd
moniker. Obviously, that's not my real name but I am accessible through
it. I don't keep my real name a secret with email... only in Usenet.

I do exactly the same thing :-)

Dudley Henriques

Dudley Henriques wrote:




This is a pasted in reply.

...............new game...my rules;

...............and your statement or question concerning flying is?

Dudley Henriques


No sense in fooling around with an admitted game player. The only person who
will follow your high-school rules is you.


--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm

This is a pasted in reply.

................new game...my rules;

................and your statement or question concerning flying is?

Dudley Henriques

cc/file
Stevens IA

"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:




This is a pasted in reply.

...............new game...my rules;

...............and your statement or question concerning flying is?

Dudley Henriques


No sense in fooling around with an admitted game player. The only person
who
will follow your high-school rules is you.


--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm

Dudley Henriques wrote:




This is a pasted in reply.

...............new game...my rules;

...............and your statement or question concerning flying is?

Dudley Henriques


At least you admit you're a game player - even if the game is solitaire.


--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm

This is a pasted in reply.

................new game...my rules;

................and your statement or question concerning flying is?

Dudley Henriques


"gregg" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:




This is a pasted in reply.

...............new game...my rules;

...............and your statement or question concerning flying is?

Dudley Henriques


At least you admit you're a game player - even if the game is solitaire.


--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm

They don't charge for that. I just got one recently.


"Nomen Nescio" ] wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"

Well, that's easy enough to fix. My commercial license has my social
security
number on it as well. I sent them $2 and they're supposed to send me one
of
those new plastic licenses with a new number on it.

They're charging for that, now? I had my SS# removed a few months ago and,
at
that time, they were sending out the plastic license for free if you
requested a
new license#.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBQnWYu5MoscYxZNI5AQEEDgP8CloJCZAb/7KTwjkIAoO2iAVfpgA6Z8rm
IPl8iRjWOgweXSa/cTZcfQ+fsuSH2M169Z7hvkKai+PUfRTRKEGvqgZNKEr3UBDt
YTGh2cFXCc1ezcI+5NA00ZiqJXrOV3tKAUKtkmcZKwo+3nkPhl k2n/FB5jxrMSvf
yphj6aZ+9Ow=
=6ppf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----