A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nav Antenna Placement



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 18th 04, 05:30 PM
Jim Pensinger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nav Antenna Placement

I am building a metal experimental aircraft that has an all moving
rudder/vertical stabilizer (Zenith Zodiac 601XL). Does the moving
stabilizer present any problems to the VOR antenna? It seems to me that the
bottom of the fuselage under the cockpit would be a better mounting place
but I have never seen this used. Is there a reason?




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #2  
Old September 19th 04, 02:20 AM
Bruce Bockius
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Pensinger" wrote in message ...
I am building a metal experimental aircraft that has an all moving
rudder/vertical stabilizer (Zenith Zodiac 601XL). Does the moving
stabilizer present any problems to the VOR antenna? It seems to me that the
bottom of the fuselage under the cockpit would be a better mounting place
but I have never seen this used. Is there a reason?


On my 601HD I mounted my VOR antenna on the bottom of the rear
fuselage just forward of the tailwheel (about 1' from the end if you
have a trike). Seems to work although I use the GPS 99.9% of the time
anyways...

http://home.earthlink.net/~fellrider/nav_ant.jpg
http://www.whiteantelopesoftware.com/zodiac

-Bruce Bockius
  #3  
Old September 19th 04, 01:38 PM
JFLEISC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On my 601HD I mounted my VOR antenna on the bottom of the rear
fuselage just forward of the tailwheel (about 1' from the end if you
have a trike). Seems to work although I use the GPS 99.9% of the time
anyways...


Exactly the same here. It gets the same or better reception than any other
plane I have flown. The added benefit is (since the top of the tail isn't as
high as my wife's Cessna) you won't take your eye out during a preflight.

Jim
  #5  
Old October 2nd 04, 12:08 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brian Cox" wrote

combination VOR/Comm, "Flying Lady".

Brian
N3827X


Huh?
--
Jim in NC


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.770 / Virus Database: 517 - Release Date: 9/28/2004


  #6  
Old October 4th 04, 04:22 PM
Brian Cox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Morgans" wrote in message ...
"Brian Cox" wrote

combination VOR/Comm, "Flying Lady".

Brian
N3827X


Huh?


It is an antenna with separate connectors for the VHF comm and the VOR
antenna. It mounts on top of the fuselage, usually over the
pilot/co-pilot location. The antenna looks like a forward swept VHF
blade. At the top is a backward swept V shaped dipole. The blade is
the comm antenna, the dipole is the VOR antenna. I may be wrong, but
I assume that they were originally designed for the V-tail Bonanza
because it did not have a vertical stabilizer to mount the VOR.

Thanks,
Brian
  #7  
Old October 4th 04, 09:20 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brian Cox" wrote
combination VOR/Comm, "Flying Lady".

Brian
N3827X


Huh?


It is an antenna with separate connectors for the VHF comm and the VOR
antenna. It mounts on top of the fuselage, usually over the
pilot/co-pilot location. The antenna looks like a forward swept VHF
blade. At the top is a backward swept V shaped dipole. The blade is
the comm antenna, the dipole is the VOR antenna. I may be wrong, but
I assume that they were originally designed for the V-tail Bonanza
because it did not have a vertical stabilizer to mount the VOR.

Thanks,
Brian


Gotcha. I had never heard them called that before.
--
Jim in NC


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.772 / Virus Database: 519 - Release Date: 10/1/2004


  #8  
Old October 4th 04, 09:55 PM
Jim Carriere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Cox wrote:
combination VOR/Comm, "Flying Lady".

It is an antenna with separate connectors for the VHF comm and the VOR
antenna. It mounts on top of the fuselage, usually over the
pilot/co-pilot location. The antenna looks like a forward swept VHF
blade. At the top is a backward swept V shaped dipole. The blade is
the comm antenna, the dipole is the VOR antenna. I may be wrong, but
I assume that they were originally designed for the V-tail Bonanza
because it did not have a vertical stabilizer to mount the VOR.


Is it a coincidence that this description resembles the Rolls Royce
"flying lady" hood ornaments?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Retractable Comm Antenna Ron Wanttaja Home Built 11 September 6th 04 06:59 PM
Another antenna question David Wilson Home Built 7 August 12th 04 10:04 PM
Antenna ground plane and coax grounding G. Fred McCutchen Home Built 2 August 8th 04 12:27 PM
ELT antenna -- Pitts Al MacDonald Home Built 0 July 15th 04 03:27 PM
comm's RX antenna acepilot Home Built 5 March 3rd 04 05:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.