If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
En route glide slope?
I was staring at the VOR-head during a flight a while back, and started
wondering why we only use half of it most of the time. Whether by GPS or VOR, the CDI provides us with lateral navigation. But the glide slope needle sits unused until the very end of the flight (if then {8^). Why? Using older technology, why not have an altitude bug and let the bug and altimeter feed the GS needle, providing VNAV information en route? Will WAAS-ified GPSs be able to drive the GS needle en route? Curiously... Andrew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:08:56 -0500, Andrew Gideon
wrote: I was staring at the VOR-head during a flight a while back, and started wondering why we only use half of it most of the time. Whether by GPS or VOR, the CDI provides us with lateral navigation. But the glide slope needle sits unused until the very end of the flight (if then {8^). Why? Using older technology, why not have an altitude bug and let the bug and altimeter feed the GS needle, providing VNAV information en route? Will WAAS-ified GPSs be able to drive the GS needle en route? Not trying to be argumentative, but a simple look at the altimeter provides all the info you need to know. I do not see much value add by having a GS needle tell me I am 100 feet too high (enroute), when I can look at the altimeter and get the same info. Another issue: The setting of the enroute cruise altitude introduces an opportunity for error - where the pilot sets the wrong cruise altitude. Of course, this issue already exists with the more advanced altitude preset autopilots. I wonder if setting the wrong altitude is a problem with those? -Nathan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nathan Young wrote:
Will WAAS-ified GPSs be able to drive the GS needle en route? Not trying to be argumentative, but a simple look at the altimeter provides all the info you need to know. Even more to the point, a look at the altimeter provides you with the correct information, namely pressure altitude. Stefan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Stefan" wrote in message ... Nathan Young wrote: Will WAAS-ified GPSs be able to drive the GS needle en route? Not trying to be argumentative, but a simple look at the altimeter provides all the info you need to know. Even more to the point, a look at the altimeter provides you with the correct information, namely pressure altitude. Uh... Stefan..., a look at the altimeter provides you with *indicated* altitude. It only shows *pressure* altitude if the altimeter setting is set to 29.92 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew,
The software on my Pocket PC provides you with a highway in the sky if you feed it the altitude you want for each leg. Michelle Andrew Gideon wrote: I was staring at the VOR-head during a flight a while back, and started wondering why we only use half of it most of the time. Whether by GPS or VOR, the CDI provides us with lateral navigation. But the glide slope needle sits unused until the very end of the flight (if then {8^). Why? Using older technology, why not have an altitude bug and let the bug and altimeter feed the GS needle, providing VNAV information en route? Will WAAS-ified GPSs be able to drive the GS needle en route? Curiously... Andrew -- Michelle P ATP-ASEL, CP-AMEL, and AMT-A&P "Elisabeth" a Maule M-7-235B (no two are alike) Volunteer Pilot, Angel Flight Mid-Atlantic Volunteer Builder, Habitat for Humanity |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Icebound wrote: "Stefan" wrote in message ... Nathan Young wrote: Will WAAS-ified GPSs be able to drive the GS needle en route? Not trying to be argumentative, but a simple look at the altimeter provides all the info you need to know. Even more to the point, a look at the altimeter provides you with the correct information, namely pressure altitude. Uh... Stefan..., a look at the altimeter provides you with *indicated* altitude. It only shows *pressure* altitude if the altimeter setting is set to 29.92 Sounds like his enroute flight takes place above FL 180 Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Many, if not most, turbine airplanes have this but it requires an airdata
computer system. You can set it to arrive at a particular point at a specific altitude. You need an airdata system as long as you are climbing or descending to a pressure altitiude. WAAS could only guide you to a GPS altitude. Mike MU-2 "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message online.com... I was staring at the VOR-head during a flight a while back, and started wondering why we only use half of it most of the time. Whether by GPS or VOR, the CDI provides us with lateral navigation. But the glide slope needle sits unused until the very end of the flight (if then {8^). Why? Using older technology, why not have an altitude bug and let the bug and altimeter feed the GS needle, providing VNAV information en route? Will WAAS-ified GPSs be able to drive the GS needle en route? Curiously... Andrew |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Icebound" wrote in message ... "Stefan" wrote in message ... Nathan Young wrote: Will WAAS-ified GPSs be able to drive the GS needle en route? Not trying to be argumentative, but a simple look at the altimeter provides all the info you need to know. Even more to the point, a look at the altimeter provides you with the correct information, namely pressure altitude. Uh... Stefan..., a look at the altimeter provides you with *indicated* altitude. It only shows *pressure* altitude if the altimeter setting is set to 29.92 All altitudes shown on an altimeter are "pressure altitudes" (as opposed to true altitudes) since the altimeter is an air pressure guage marked in feet. Mike MU-2 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
k.net... Many, if not most, turbine airplanes have this but it requires an airdata computer system. You can set it to arrive at a particular point at a specific altitude. You need an airdata system as long as you are climbing or descending to a pressure altitiude. WAAS could only guide you to a GPS altitude. Does it really drive the glideslope needle? Some of the more sophisticated GPSs have VNAV functionality, and turbine aircraft FMSs almost certainly do too, based on a barometric altitude input. But I always thought there was a reluctance to put the information on the GS needle because the glideslope of an ILS is generally associated with a trajectory with terrain clearance -- something that simple VNAV can't guarantee. Julian Scarfe |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Icebound wrote:
Uh... Stefan..., a look at the altimeter provides you with *indicated* altitude. It only shows *pressure* altitude if the altimeter setting is set to 29.92 Uh... Icebound..., the altimeter *always* indicates pressure altitude. To get useful information, you must set the altimeter appropriately, of course. Appropriately may or may not mean 1013. On the other hand, your GPS always gives you GPS altitude, which is of no value in flight. Stefan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Route Advice? KGEU (Phoenix) -> KEMT (Los Angeles) | Eclipsme | Piloting | 4 | August 13th 04 04:15 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
filing IFR plan for VFR flight conditions | Paul Safran | Instrument Flight Rules | 53 | May 11th 04 03:07 AM |
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 10:01 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |