If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
In article et, Jerry
Springer writes: Was anyone talking to you? If you don't like to see people talking here with people you don't like, don't read. Shoo. Juan You said one time you were going back to PR so your kids could get a better education than they can get here in this country. If you are the product of the PR education system I feel sorry for your kids. Now, don't let the door hit you in the ass as you leave this country. Please hurry and go. Jerry AND TAKE JIM WITH YOU! Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Kind of difficult when you don't use your real address for a response.
Juan E Jimenez wrote: "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message et... I've tried asking Jim... The typical result is a nasty response including the threat of legal action and a demand that I not e-mail ANN again. Kind of odd, given that I respond to articles in numerous publications maybe a half dozen times a year, and other than ANN I've never been threatened or instructed not to write back. KB I've seen the responses that Jim typically makes to email queries sent to him by readers (when I receive fwd's of reader inquiries about my articles, or about issues that ANN considers of interest to me), and I've never seen any threats of legal action. What was the content of your email (not your recollection, the actual text) and the content of the response (again, actual text, not your recollection)? Juan |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
I have tried to killfile juan's postings but he has done
something to his headers that prevents my filter from blocking his drivel. The visible return address is listed in my killfile (five different times) but that is not blocking anything. Can anybody who knows someting about computers tell me what to put into my killfile that will actually stop his trash? Thanks, Scott McQ 1¾ ************************************************** * The reply e-dress is a dead end. If you want me to read your e-mail, send it to "dropbox" at the same ISP. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Come on Bill, don't confuse the poor dumbass. If he has proof, he should produce it or shut up. This crap by Campbell has gone on way too long now and needs to be brought to an end. Jim Campbell's never ending vendetta against Chuck, even if the so call charges were true, is getting ridiculous. Nobody should have to put up with having their name and business trashed in any publication on an ongoing, never ending basis. This is especially true when the proof of the allegations has never been forthcoming. The whole issue used as the justification for the ongoing assault is more than 7 years old. Bob Reed I'm not so sure that the publicity Chuck gets from some maniacal rant is all harmful. I think most people who really know what's going on, understand the rift and take it for what it's worth. As for those who don't know beans about Zoom or Chuck, I really think that the press, even though negative possibly helps Chuck because it keeps his company's name in circulation. Yes, I know this is a strange thing to say to some of you, but I have friends who feel that any press, negative press included can be a benefit. I'm not trying to open a debate over this, I'm just speculating a bit, and I'm not sure what the real outcome is. But, I'll guarantee you one thing, everybody in the ultralight industry knows who Zoom is and they all hold him and what he says in context. Having Zoom out to get you is considered an product endorsement by many. In fact most of the readers of this group are in that category! Just some simple minded thinking out loud this morning. Bill |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:54:09 GMT, "Juan E Jimenez"
wrote: "Badwater Bill" wrote in message .. . Settling out of court, pretrial, is not an admission of guilt. Civil lawsuits are not about guilt. They can be. Bill |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
"Stu Fields" wrote in message ... It is impossible to believe the amount of energy going into this kind of thing!!! I could build a house with the time and energy spent in flaming each other in this newsgroup. What does everyone get out of this excercise? What is the purpose or goal behind it?? I'm really curious. Basically they have run out of anything useful to write or say so they have reviewed all that has been said in the past, now they are just bitching about it. Being old their memory about what really happened is fadeing a little. -- .. -- Cheers, Jonathan Lowe whatever at antispam dot net No email address given because of spam. Antispam trap in place Stu Fields "Juan E Jimenez" wrote in message news:y_t6b.278017$cF.86657@rwcrnsc53... "Jez" wrote in message news 1) Chuck Slusarczyk seems to have consistently told the truth, even when it has been an admission that he has settled law suits for fairly large sums of money, which could reasonably be expected to cause a certain amount of embarrassment. Despite many attempts to catch Chuck out in a lie, no-one seems to have succeeded. You're entitled to your opinion. I disagree. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Juan E Jimenez"
Chuck will not be further embarassed if he chooses not to make any more derogatory comments about me and imply that I lie about him. And I don't even have to surmise that it might be worth a try... Juan, he implied nothing of the sort. He STATED you lied. No implication on his part nor a need for you to infer. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Juan E Jimenez"
Funny, I have seen the signs and do not recalling Jim Campbell's name on any of those signs. Poor naive Bob, doesn't have a clue what the signs were about, and thinks everyone else thinks the same. Not. Read it again, Juan, he didn't say he didn't know what the signs were about, he simply said he doesn't recall seeing Jim Campbell's name on the signs. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Why do you guys keep bothering with Juan? Was anyone talking to you? If you don't like to see people talking here with people you don't like, don't read. Shoo. Juan Just as a matter of curiosity has anyone ever seen Tarver and Juan in the same room? Their tactics are identical. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
"Juan E Jimenez" wrote in message
. .. I don't disagree that we need tort reform, but I do disagree that all lawsuits that are settled out of court have no merit, or are settled solely for economic reasons. Many times suits are settled because the defendant realized that there's no way he/she can win. I think you know that as well as I do. I didn't say --- all cases settled out of court have no merit. I did say --- settling out of court says nothing about a case's merit. Remember, cases get settled out of court because the plaintiff gets a guaranteed payout instead of rolling the dice and possibly getting nothing. The plaintiff settles because their case isn't so airtight that they're assured of a win. The defendant is more strongly motivated to settle because when juries are involved because there is no upper bound to what might be awarded. I'm in favor of capital punishment for stupid juries... summary judgments, immediately enforced, no chance for appeals! Eric (Of course, I feel the same way about parking tickets and jaywalking ) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Latest Pipistrel Motorglider Newsletter Uploaded | Michael Coates | Home Built | 1 | September 16th 03 06:04 PM |
so what is the latest word on Sport Pilot ??? | Gilan | Home Built | 12 | September 7th 03 11:14 PM |
Latest Ripon & Fisk (OSH) Updates | Jim Weir | Home Built | 4 | July 20th 03 10:59 PM |
Latest Newsletter | Michael Coates | Home Built | 3 | July 15th 03 10:04 PM |