If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#661
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
Air resistance. Do it in a vacuum and they will hit at the same time.
mike "Roger (K8RI)" wrote in message ... On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:47:52 +0100, Thomas Borchert wrote: Jose, It was obvious that heavier things fall faster (feather, stone, duh) Drop a sheet of paper (airfoil) and a peanut that weighs the same off a tall building. Which will get to the ground/pavement sooner (no wind) Actually, they don't. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#662
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
In article ,
Jim Logajan wrote: Jose wrote: It was obvious that heavier things fall faster (feather, stone, duh) Actually, they don't. Correct. But it was obvious that they do. Boy, I hate to be pedantic about this, but in a vacuum the heavier object _will_ reach the surface of the earth faster than a lighter one if both are released the same height above the ground. First, the forces are equal on a mass Mo and the earth Me a distance h apart from their gravitational centers; the equation being: [etc.] Interesting. You're saying the earth accelerates towards the heavy object a little bit faster than towards the light one, right? But there's only one earth, and if you drop them both at the same time, don't they both hit the rising earth at the same time? You didn't say they were released at the same time, but that was the implication in the thread. Mike Beede |
#663
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
Bob Noel wrote:
In article , Jim Logajan wrote: But the bottom line is under "ideal" conditions a heavy stone "falls" a teeny tiny miniscule bit faster to the earth than a light feather would. um, not quite. The force on the more massive object is still just proportional to the earth's mass. What happens is the earth moves towards the more massive object more so than towards the less massive object. Or have I totally botched my freshman physics? You got it right. But to the person standing on the earth trying to time the fall, the more massive object appears to drop a tiny bit faster (but I'm not sure the drop time difference could even be measured for most ordinary cases). It's really a pedantic issue unless one is dealing with objects of comparable masses, like the perturbations of planetary orbits due to other planets. |
#664
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
But it was obvious that they do.
Uhm, no. And Newton's law never said anything remotely like that. Um, yes. Lots of things that are obvious, are not true. The "fact" that heavier objects fall faster was obvious. It is also wrong. Newton's law of universal gravitation led to the result that masses fall to earth at the same rate. Newton had some other discoveries too. Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#665
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
Boy, I hate to be pedantic about this, but in a vacuum the heavier object
_will_ reach the surface of the earth faster than a lighter one if both are released the same height above the ground. That depends where they come from. If you pick up the feather (leaving the stone on the ground), the stone's mass is part of the Earth's mass. If you then drop the feather and pick up the stone, the feather becomes part of the Earth's mass for that experiment. The total mass is the same. This is true in real experiments too, unless you can "beam" the stone away while playing with the feather. End of pedantry. Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#666
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:37:33 -0000, Jim Logajan
wrote: You got it right. But to the person standing on the earth trying to time the fall, the more massive object appears to drop a tiny bit faster (but I'm not sure the drop time difference could even be measured for most ordinary cases). It's really a pedantic issue unless one is dealing with objects of comparable masses, like the perturbations of planetary orbits due to other planets. Ya gonna drop the marble and the bowling ball at the same time? Counting the Earth, that's three bodies. I thought the three-body problem was insoluble? Don |
#667
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
Jim,
You're right, of course. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#668
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
In article ,
Jim Logajan wrote: You got it right. But to the person standing on the earth trying to time the fall, the more massive object appears to drop a tiny bit faster (but I'm not sure the drop time difference could even be measured for most ordinary cases). If the feather and hammer are dropped at the same time and are next to each other. otoh - if the hammer is dropped at the true north pole and the feather were dropped at the true south pole... :-) -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#669
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
"Bob Noel" wrote in message
... If the feather and hammer are dropped at the same time and are next to each other. otoh - if the hammer is dropped at the true north pole and the feather were dropped at the true south pole... Ahhh, but more importantly, is the feather from an African or European swallow... -- "Your mother was a hamster and your father smells of elderberrys now go away or I shall taunt you a second time" |
#670
|
|||
|
|||
PHIL Thrown out of an FBO...
Mike Beede wrote:
But there's only one earth, and if you drop them both at the same time, don't they both hit the rising earth at the same time? You didn't say they were released at the same time, but that was the implication in the thread. I was treating the case where only two objects were in motion at any one time - it's a lot simpler. Since the implied problem is a three body problem it isn't going to be so easy to prove that two objects of different masses released at the same time will accelerate at the same rate towards the center of the earth. The actual trajectories are going to be surprisingly complex. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I think old planes should be thrown away !!! | Tristan Beeline | Restoration | 6 | January 20th 06 04:05 AM |
Rocks Thrown at Border Patrol Chopper | [email protected] | Piloting | 101 | September 1st 05 12:10 PM |