Class B busted...My problem or the controller's ?

"Jose" wrote in message
. ..

I knew somebody would say that. You'd hear it on the other radio.


No you wouldn't. A stuck mike blocks the frequency.



It might even be the other radio that's causing the problem. i.e. you're
operating split, the copilot is on ground with the stuck mike, and you are
on tower. You take off to do pattern work. Tower tell you to turn off
all your radios. The pilot hears it, the copilot (of course) does not.


The tower isn't going to do that.

No you wouldn't. A stuck mike blocks the frequency.

It doesn't block the other frequency.

The tower isn't going to do that.

Maybe your tower won't do that.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
m...

It doesn't block the other frequency.


It only broadcasts on one frequency.



Maybe your tower won't do that.


No tower will.

It only broadcasts on one frequency.

Right. The stuck mike is on ground, monitored by the co-pilot operating
split. The other radio is on tower, monitored by the pilot.

Happened at DXR.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
m...

Right. The stuck mike is on ground, monitored by the co-pilot operating
split. The other radio is on tower, monitored by the pilot.


Now you're catching on.



Happened at DXR.


Perhaps, but DXR tower didn't tell everyone to turn off all their radios.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

While the ultimate responsibility for complying with FARs lies with
the PIC, it is my understanding that ATC is mandated by FAAO 7110.65*
to coordinate transit into/through the airspace of other facilities.


Radar controllers are required to coordinate with the control tower for
transit authorization when providing radar traffic advisory service to an
aircraft that will enter a Class D surface area. That's not the situation
here.

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...

I think what Antoñio was asking for was a regulation to support the notion
that a pilot can or must refuse an ATC instruction just because compliance
would violate the FARs. That is, what regulation says that other
regulations take precedence over 91.123b (which requires compliance with
ATC instructions, except if there's an emergency need to deviate)? As far
as I can tell, there's no such regulation (although AIM 4-4-1a,b and
4-4-6c are at least tangentially relevant).


From FAA Order 7110.65:

"Pilots are required to abide by CFRs or other applicable regulations
regardless of the application of any procedure or minima in this order."

http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/ATC/Chp2/atc0201.html#2-1-1

Perhaps, but DXR tower didn't tell everyone to turn off all their radios.

No, just the offending aircraft.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
.. .

No, just the offending aircraft.


Not that either.

Not that either.

You were there? I was.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.