A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is the DC ADIZ on the charts?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 13th 03, 07:00 PM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is the DC ADIZ on the charts?

from AVWeb:
"Frankly, we're a bit frustrated that pilots are still violating it,
and we don't know why," the FAA's William Shumann told AVweb
yesterday. "It's on the charts, it's on our Web site."

*Is* the DC ADIZ on the charts? Not on websites, on actual VFR
sectionals
and TACs?

Thanks!
Sydney
  #2  
Old November 13th 03, 07:24 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Snowbird ) wrote:

from AVWeb:
"Frankly, we're a bit frustrated that pilots are still violating it,
and we don't know why," the FAA's William Shumann told AVweb
yesterday. "It's on the charts, it's on our Web site."

*Is* the DC ADIZ on the charts? Not on websites, on actual VFR
sectionals
and TACs?


Yes, it is. On the Washington Sectional the entire ADIZ is devoid of
terrain shading, which makes the area really stand out.


--
Peter















----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #3  
Old November 13th 03, 07:28 PM
Jay Masino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter R. wrote:
Yes, it is. On the Washington Sectional the entire ADIZ is devoid of
terrain shading, which makes the area really stand out.



No it's not. The inner Flight Restricted Zone (FRZ) is on the chart, but
the ADIZ is not.

-- Jay


__!__
Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___
http://www2.ari.net/jmasino/ ! ! !

Checkout http://www.oc-adolfos.com/
for the best Italian food in Ocean City, MD and...
Checkout http://www.brolow.com/ for authentic Blues music on Delmarva

  #4  
Old November 13th 03, 07:28 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter R. ) wrote:


Yes, it is. On the Washington Sectional the entire ADIZ is devoid of
terrain shading, which makes the area really stand out.


Sheesh, my memory was wrong. I just looked at the scanned sectional on
Aeroplanner and only inner ring is missing terrain shading. The outer
boundaries are drawn on the sectional chart as heavy blue lines.

Sorry for the incorrect info.


--
Peter















----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #5  
Old November 13th 03, 07:28 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Snowbird" wrote in message om...
from AVWeb:
"Frankly, we're a bit frustrated that pilots are still violating it,
and we don't know why," the FAA's William Shumann told AVweb
yesterday. "It's on the charts, it's on our Web site."

*Is* the DC ADIZ on the charts? Not on websites, on actual VFR
sectionals
and TACs?

No, the ADIZ is NOT charted. The FRZ is. It shows up as a big white
spotch centered over DC.

I got into a discussion with a representative of NACO at one of the local pilots
meetings. They claimed they couldn't put temporary stuff on charts. I pointed
out that was nonsense because:

1. Nobody has indicated the ADIZ is temporary. They did chart the FRZ which is
no less transient.
2. They have put TFR's on the chart before. We even had a special issuance of the
DC TAC and Sectionals denoting the TFR's during the preliminary rounds of the
Olympic soccer matches held in the area.

If they can make an exception for a few weeks during the Olympics, why can't they
fix the *@#$@ charts when it's supposed important to national security.



  #6  
Old November 13th 03, 07:30 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter R." wrote in message ...
Snowbird ) wrote:

from AVWeb:
"Frankly, we're a bit frustrated that pilots are still violating it,
and we don't know why," the FAA's William Shumann told AVweb
yesterday. "It's on the charts, it's on our Web site."

*Is* the DC ADIZ on the charts? Not on websites, on actual VFR
sectionals
and TACs?


Yes, it is. On the Washington Sectional the entire ADIZ is devoid of
terrain shading, which makes the area really stand out.

That's the FRZ, not the ADIZ


  #7  
Old November 13th 03, 07:34 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter R." wrote in message ...
Peter R. ) wrote:


Yes, it is. On the Washington Sectional the entire ADIZ is devoid of
terrain shading, which makes the area really stand out.


Sheesh, my memory was wrong. I just looked at the scanned sectional on
Aeroplanner and only inner ring is missing terrain shading. The outer
boundaries are drawn on the sectional chart as heavy blue lines.

That's NO depiction of the ADIZ at all. The blue lines are the Class B.
The ADIZ does not follow the class B bondaries. Look at the red lines
that AEROPLANNER.COM themselves draws on the chart on the south
side of the airspace. There is NO marking on the printed chart that
corresponds to the red line.


  #8  
Old November 13th 03, 07:36 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Natalie ) wrote:

snip
2. They have put TFR's on the chart before.


Check out P-67, which is the expanded TFR surrounding the Kennebunkport,
ME, area. This TFR is depicted on the NY sectional as I (perhaps)
mistakenly thought of the ADIZ; devoid of terrain shading.

--
Peter


























----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #9  
Old November 13th 03, 07:59 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Natalie ) wrote:

That's NO depiction of the ADIZ at all.


Ah, fercrinoutloud. I'll just be crawling back into my hole now.

--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #10  
Old November 13th 03, 08:32 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Snowbird" wrote in message
om...

from AVWeb:
"Frankly, we're a bit frustrated that pilots are still violating it,
and we don't know why," the FAA's William Shumann told AVweb
yesterday. "It's on the charts, it's on our Web site."

*Is* the DC ADIZ on the charts? Not on websites, on actual VFR
sectionals
and TACs?


AeroPlanner's online charts show it.

http://map.aeroplanner.com/mapping/c...yp=APT&txt=iad


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RNAV Enroute CHarts John R. Copeland Instrument Flight Rules 0 September 20th 04 03:33 PM
how to get NACO online charts conveniently? Dave Butler Instrument Flight Rules 41 June 16th 04 03:14 PM
Can US enroute charts be used in Canada? Andrew Sarangan Instrument Flight Rules 0 May 31st 04 09:58 PM
that Mooney in DC ADIZ Cub Driver Piloting 10 November 13th 03 09:15 PM
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? Bob Gardner Instrument Flight Rules 5 September 6th 03 01:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.