Stupid Attorney taling about GPS's

"Richard Hertz" wrote in message
...
Huh,

I was under the impression that the GPS signals are fairly weak and
intentional interference is a serious issue.
Is that not correct?

Intentional jamming of GPS is difficult for newer units, as a simple filter
algorithm will remove most jamming signals. Do you know the difference
between spoofing and jamming?

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:33:31 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

At that point Scott's Attorney would be well on
his way to giving testimony illegally.

The lawyer wasn't giving testimony! He can say any damn thing he
pleases, subject to being shut up by the judge.

No.

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Peter" wrote in message
news:ROVYb.217372$U%5.1284734@attbi_s03...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

The failure to monitor the integrity of the WAAS signal is why the test

bit

remained set until recently. The integrity issues were WAAS integrity
issues with no relevence to GPS.

Unaugmented GPS has insufficient integrity monitoring.


See the CNX-80.

Buy a vowel, get a clue, call your mommy.

http://www.avionicsplace.com/ApolloCNX80.htm :
"The FAA’s new Wide Area Augmentation System or WAAS dramatically improves
the accuracy, integrity, and availability of GPS. The CNX80 incorporates a
new 15-channel WAAS receiver designed by UPS Aviation Technologies
specifically for airborne applications."

Interesting... Must be local... Just this past 6 week jury session our very
well known circuit judge, had to cancel trials so he could sit on jury
duty... After having sat on two cases, and not dismissed by preemptory
challenge, he was then relieved by an alternate for having completed his
jury duty, and went back to his court room... In a newspaper article he
said he found it extremely interesting to actually get to sit in the jury
room during deliberations as he is barred from there otherwise...
"I often wondered what they talk about.", he said...
denny

The other time I mentioned that I also took 2 semesters of "Business Law".
Gone!

"Peter" wrote in message
news:305Zb.345746$I06.3635492@attbi_s01...
Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Peter" wrote in message
news:ROVYb.217372$U%5.1284734@attbi_s03...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

The failure to monitor the integrity of the WAAS signal is why the test

bit

remained set until recently. The integrity issues were WAAS integrity
issues with no relevence to GPS.

Unaugmented GPS has insufficient integrity monitoring.


See the CNX-80.

Buy a vowel, get a clue, call your mommy.

http://www.avionicsplace.com/ApolloCNX80.htm :
"The FAA’s new Wide Area Augmentation System or WAAS dramatically improves
the accuracy, integrity, and availability of GPS.

Nope, but a salseman needs to sell. If you look at the difference in
minimums for the VNAV, you will note that WAAS gives the operator little to
nothing in increased capabilities.

WAAS was a scam run on aviation to remove tens of $billions from the
aviation trust fund; from that perspective WAAS is a tremendous success.
WAAS is the reason sci.geo.satellite-nav is a discredited and dishonest
newsgroup. Ron Lee being a possible exception.

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

As far as Clinton goes, it's ancient history.

And you've forgiven Nixon, right?

Nope. Only good thing about Nixon, was , he got things done. The end does
not justify the means.

Remember, he got nailed for a coverup, of an operation he did not authorize.
He was too protective of his own people. He should have fed them to the
wolves, then he would have gone down in history as a great president.
--
Jim in NC


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 2/7/04

ahhhh!!!!

"Nomen Nescio" ] wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: "Dennis O'Connor"

Interesting... Must be local... Just this past 6 week jury session our
very
well known circuit judge, had to cancel trials so he could sit on jury
duty... After having sat on two cases, and not dismissed by preemptory
challenge, he was then relieved by an alternate for having completed his
jury duty, and went back to his court room... In a newspaper article he
said he found it extremely interesting to actually get to sit in the jury
room during deliberations as he is barred from there otherwise...
"I often wondered what they talk about.", he said...
denny

The other time I mentioned that I also took 2 semesters of "Business
Law".
Gone!

I live in Massachusetts.
'Nuff said??




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBQDUkt5MoscYxZNI5AQFzjgP+IBmK57AZLK0v/JpdlmpbvelRkNbUQ5//
TjxUfo3jjTgzQYbGfj5Bbvc+/y0YrjlzI6dgl5re1Laay4qRMFf4GVrGUJB1/c0s
IGERAkTV/w6H3WFijr6Fft3m7tmxpa8Hz7p1CqFRyRzdirNYYeADt6l7e5y N2xVT
Y3e81opNJe4=
=C4jY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

The actual news article goes into this detail. After Laci Peterson was
reported missing, the police department placed covert GPS tracking
devices on all of his vehicles and monitored the vehicle (and therefore
Scott's) whereabouts pretty much constantly. This explains how they
thought he was headed for Mexico to flee the country. The defense
attorney is trying to get this surveillance data thrown out/disallowed..
and in trying to do so invoked the claim that if GPS wasnt accurate
enough to land airplanes, it wasnt iron-clad enough to be used as
evidence in a capital case.

Dave

G.R. Patterson III wrote:

Dave S wrote:

Good call on the judge allowing the evidence.


What evidence? Gerald's post simply stated that an attorney made an obviously
incorrect statement. What did I miss?

George Patterson
A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that
you look forward to the trip.

A maomentary error with what equipment?




The equipment that was in use for surveillance on Mr Peterson.

If you are going to discuss a thread based on current events, wouldnt it
be a good idea to be familiar with the context its being discussed in?

Dave

I would think he would be questioning what business the police had tracking
Peterson's whereabouts AFTER the crime was commited.

At the time the devices were PROBABLY placed, this was a missing persons
case, and Scott was PROBABLY the prime suspect. The police (and I'm sure
a judge agreed at some point) were trying to surveil a suspect by using
these devices.

but... thats just speculation on my point.
Dave

It seems the prosecution is trying him with character assasination after the
fact rather than with evidence of the crime itself. He'll probably wind up
being the first person executed for having an affair.

Don