A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

lancair crash scapoose, OR



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 23rd 06, 04:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR


Yesterday, according to the news, a pilot and his grandson walked away from
a crashed Lancair after it had an electrical failure on takeoff and made a
gear-up crash landing.

Question: Do Lancairs not have a hydraulic dump or something to lower the
gear in the event of such a failure?

-c


  #2  
Old October 23rd 06, 07:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 774
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR

"gatt" wrote in message
...

Yesterday, according to the news, a pilot and his grandson walked away
from a crashed Lancair after it had an electrical failure on takeoff and
made a gear-up crash landing.

Question: Do Lancairs not have a hydraulic dump or something to lower
the gear in the event of such a failure?


What type of Lancair? If the certified Columbia, they must. From FAR
23.729:

(c) Emergency operation. For a landplane having retractable

landing gear that cannot be extended manually, there must be

means to extend the landing gear in the event of either—

(1) Any reasonably probable failure in the normal landing gear

operation system; or

(2) Any reasonably probable failure in a power source that

would prevent the operation of the normal landing gear

operation system


Since an electrical failure would be a "reasonably probably failure in a
power source...", a Columbia must have some sort of backup gear operation
system.

I'm less sure of how the experimental rules work, but I wouldn't be
surprised if one still needs some sort of backup operation system for the
gear, even for amateur-built experimentals.

Pete


  #3  
Old October 23rd 06, 10:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...

Question: Do Lancairs not have a hydraulic dump or something to lower
the gear in the event of such a failure?


What type of Lancair? If the certified Columbia, they must. From FAR
23.729:


Don't know. Ironically, I can't find the story in any of the local news
sources. They showed it on the 11 o'clock news last night, but that's the
last I've heard of it. Everything forward of the firewall looked crushed
and knocked 90 degrees to the side and the pilot looked like, well, he'd
just narrowly survived a crash with his grandson on board.

Bigger news, though, that fits the Dirty Laundry bill was a woman who fell
asleep at the wheel of her RV and rolled it on I-84 and another where a guy
was crushed by a rolling car which was in Park and had its emergency brake
on. (?!)

-c


  #4  
Old October 23rd 06, 10:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 774
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR

"Richard Riley" wrote in message
...
The Columbia does NOT have a backup gear operation system. Never has,
probably never will.


Hmmm...I thought they had released a retractable version recently. Wonder
where I got that idea.

In that case, then the rules for experimentals would apply...like I said,
I'm less familiar with those rules. It surprises me that the basic
certification standards for the amateur-built category aren't more similar
to Part 23, but if it happens that they aren't, I don't have any first-hand
knowledge that would contradict that.

Pete


  #5  
Old October 24th 06, 12:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:47:24 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

"gatt" wrote in message
...

Yesterday, according to the news, a pilot and his grandson walked away
from a crashed Lancair after it had an electrical failure on takeoff and
made a gear-up crash landing.

Question: Do Lancairs not have a hydraulic dump or something to lower
the gear in the event of such a failure?


What type of Lancair? If the certified Columbia, they must. From FAR
23.729:

(c) Emergency operation. For a landplane having retractable

landing gear that cannot be extended manually, there must be


I'm not sure about this wording or if I'm missing something, but on a
Bonanza you only have two choices. The normal electric method and
manually. If the electric fails you must extend the gear manually
and if you are on take off when this happens forget even trying. It
takes 51 turns of a little gear handle and about two minutes to
manually extend the gear on a Bo. Oh..and to do so the pilot must
lean over and back between the seats to turn that little crank. That
means your head is below the bottom of the instrument panel. You best
know how to fly instruments or you will get a lot of exercise by
leaning over, make a turn (once the gear door is open you can only do
a half turn at a time although if you are fast you can get in two half
turns) and then straighten back up to look outside. That is a *LOT*
of sideways sit ups! Also it behooves the pilot to keep the speed
well below the maximum for gear extension but high enough to be safe.
Near the maximum that little handle is nigh onto impossible to turn.

If the gear won't come down and you are coming into a controlled
airport you might just as well tell them the problem and then fly out
where you have time and room to crank the gear down and stay out of
every one else's way.



means to extend the landing gear in the event of either—

(1) Any reasonably probable failure in the normal landing gear

operation system; or

(2) Any reasonably probable failure in a power source that

would prevent the operation of the normal landing gear

operation system


Which means lowering the gear manually, but that is referred to in the
first sentence.


Since an electrical failure would be a "reasonably probably failure in a
power source...", a Columbia must have some sort of backup gear operation
system.

I'm less sure of how the experimental rules work, but I wouldn't be
surprised if one still needs some sort of backup operation system for the
gear, even for amateur-built experimentals.


The Twin Comanche had the simplest emergency gear operation. Pull the
handle the gravity pulls the gear down.


Pete

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #6  
Old October 24th 06, 01:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kyle Boatright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Richard Riley" wrote in message
...
The Columbia does NOT have a backup gear operation system. Never has,
probably never will.


Hmmm...I thought they had released a retractable version recently. Wonder
where I got that idea.

In that case, then the rules for experimentals would apply...like I said,
I'm less familiar with those rules. It surprises me that the basic
certification standards for the amateur-built category aren't more similar
to Part 23, but if it happens that they aren't, I don't have any
first-hand knowledge that would contradict that.


Providing you can demonstrate compliance to the 51% rule, you can add
seatbelts, an N number, and the proper instrumentation to your barca-lounger
and get it "certified" as an experimental-amateur built. You'll have to add
a transponder, encoder, and a radio to fly it into Class B airspace. If you
deem the instrumentation adequate, you'll be able to fly it IFR as long as
you get the rating and the pitot/static/transponder passes the annual IFR
recertification test.

There are very few rules governing experimentals. This is a good thing if
you believe in self determination. Members of the "we have to be protected
against ourselves crowd" are probably not as appreciative.

KB


  #7  
Old October 24th 06, 11:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
.Blueskies.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 249
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR


"gatt" wrote in message ...
:: Don't know. Ironically, I can't find the story in any of the local news
: sources. They showed it on the 11 o'clock news last night, but that's the
: last I've heard of it. Everything forward of the firewall looked crushed
: and knocked 90 degrees to the side and the pilot looked like, well, he'd
: just narrowly survived a crash with his grandson on board.
:
:


not on the news cuz nobody died, doesn't fit the airplanes are not safe profile...


  #8  
Old October 25th 06, 08:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kingfish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 470
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR


Roger (K8RI) wrote:
The Twin Comanche had the simplest emergency gear operation. Pull the
handle the gravity pulls the gear down.


Not unlike any other retractable gear Piper built since the 60's IIRC...

  #9  
Old October 26th 06, 02:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:35:48 -0700, "gatt"
wrote:


Yesterday, according to the news, a pilot and his grandson walked away from
a crashed Lancair after it had an electrical failure on takeoff and made a
gear-up crash landing.

Question: Do Lancairs not have a hydraulic dump or something to lower the
gear in the event of such a failure?


The following, posted on a local aviation forum by a friend of the pilot, may
help:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"During the flight, he experienced total electrical failure. An emergency, yes,
but not something that would cause the airplane to fall out of the sky. He
headed back to Scappoose, where he entered the downwind. He turned base then
final, visually clearing each leg, as his radio was not working. He DID extend
the gear by using the emergency extension, which on that airplane is simply a
lever that allows the gear to free-fall. Upon VERY short final, he noticed an
airplane on the runway. He quickly side-stepped the runway to land on the grass.
At the same moment, he added full power to initiate a go-around. The immediate
torque of the engine caused a left bank and descent. The airplane hit the ground
in a left wing low attitude. It cartwheeled on the left wingtip, smashing the
nose into the ground. At that point, the airplane came to rest on its belly. The
gear was down, but got torn off by the impact....Everyone is fine, but the plane
is totaled."
------------------------------------------------------------------

Ron Wanttaja

  #10  
Old October 26th 06, 12:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Neil Gould
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 723
Default lancair crash scapoose, OR

Recently, Ron Wanttaja posted:

The following, posted on a local aviation forum by a friend of the
pilot, may help:

Any word on who the pilot is?

Neil


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 Mike Naval Aviation 0 May 6th 06 11:13 PM
Pilot claims no blame in July crash Mortimer Schnerd, RN Piloting 48 March 15th 06 09:00 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Doubts raised in jet crash Dave Butler Piloting 8 July 26th 05 01:25 AM
Yet another A36 crash H.P. Piloting 10 April 23rd 05 05:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.