A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Roll Stability in lifting body and flying wing aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 04, 08:29 PM
Fred the Red Shirt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roll Stability in lifting body and flying wing aircraft

IIUC, the B-2 and F-117 rely on continuous feedback and control,
they could not be flown without computers.

So how do lifting bodies and Flying Wings like the facetmobile or the
Chance-Vought V-173 "Flying Flapjack" maintain roll stability? They
appear to have no or negative dihedral.

--

FF
  #2  
Old December 3rd 04, 08:59 PM
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
om...
IIUC, the B-2 and F-117 rely on continuous feedback and control,
they could not be flown without computers.

So how do lifting bodies and Flying Wings like the facetmobile or the
Chance-Vought V-173 "Flying Flapjack" maintain roll stability? They
appear to have no or negative dihedral.

--

FF


Having helped build and test fly a flying wing, maybe I can help.

To the roll stability question there are two answers.

1. You don't really need roll stability as long as you don't have real roll
instability. Pilots can easily keep the wings level.

2. Sweep back has the same effect as dihedral. Sometimes the dihedral
effect of sweep is so strong that anthedral (negative dihedral) is needed to
give the aircraft maneuverability.

Pitch stability comes mainly from the airfoil choice. Or, in the case of
swept back flying wings, from wing twist. Sometimes, it's a combination of
both.

Yaw stability and control is the big problem of flying wings. Here,
computer stability augmentation is very useful.

Bill Daniels

  #3  
Old December 3rd 04, 10:24 PM
Juan Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A few months ago I read a fantastic article about this very subject in an
aviation magazine, but for the life of me I can't remember which one. It was
written by one of the test pilots who flew Northrop's flying wings. VERY,
VERY interesting reading. It was one of the magazines that specialized on
WWII aircraft subjects. Anybody else remember seeing this?

"Bill Daniels" wrote in message
news:Es4sd.605454$mD.500572@attbi_s02...

"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
om...
IIUC, the B-2 and F-117 rely on continuous feedback and control,
they could not be flown without computers.

So how do lifting bodies and Flying Wings like the facetmobile or the
Chance-Vought V-173 "Flying Flapjack" maintain roll stability? They
appear to have no or negative dihedral.

--

FF


Having helped build and test fly a flying wing, maybe I can help.

To the roll stability question there are two answers.

1. You don't really need roll stability as long as you don't have real
roll
instability. Pilots can easily keep the wings level.

2. Sweep back has the same effect as dihedral. Sometimes the dihedral
effect of sweep is so strong that anthedral (negative dihedral) is needed
to
give the aircraft maneuverability.

Pitch stability comes mainly from the airfoil choice. Or, in the case of
swept back flying wings, from wing twist. Sometimes, it's a combination
of
both.

Yaw stability and control is the big problem of flying wings. Here,
computer stability augmentation is very useful.

Bill Daniels




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 1st 04 08:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 April 1st 04 08:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 March 1st 04 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 February 1st 04 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 January 1st 04 06:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.