If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"ian maclure" wrote in message news On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 07:12:47 -0500, Bob Escher wrote: No but according to today's news his commanders did it all for him. He didn't have to do a thing according to the reports Not been paying close attention have we. Said reports have been outed as forgeries. http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...uments-_Forged http://www.warbirdforum.com/bushf102.htm Comes the day of reckoning on Nov 3 there's gonna be a few very sorry Dhimmicrips. You know, at first I thought the forgery bit was maybe just sourgrapes, but after reading the alleged document, you gotta ask--who the heck really thinks such a document would have ended up in Bush's own military records anyway? Memos-for-record titled "CYA" do NOT end up in some guys 201 file. Coupled with the interesting fact that the document CBS put out, which supposedly dated from 1972 and would have at best been done up on an IBM Selectric, matches *exactly* the same document ginned up using MS Word, the forgery case does indeed seem realistic. Whatcha make a bet the big media ignores this (having already trumpeted the documents), just like they are trying to ignore Kerry's own contradictory Vietnam stories versus his own journal entries from that time period? Brooks IBM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|