If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The up and down sides of rotors relative to ridges
At 16:40 08 April 2016, Dan Marotta wrote:
My thinking is that for a wind blowing towards the east, the top of the rotor is also blowing east and the bottom of the rotor is blowing west, so the lift side of the rotor is to the west of the sink side. This is idealized because if the feature causing the wave is convoluted and irregular, all sorts of chaotic interactions can result in unpredictable patterns. That's right, and I don't think it can be predicted, hence my original position that I would not penetrate upwind looking for the up side of the rotor unless I had plenty of altitude AGL and a place to bail out (figuratively). I have personally worked rotor up into wave an several occasions, but I've always had at least 5K' AGL when I did it. This is the nature of western flying. -- Dan, 5J I think Dan is right in the fact that there are a lot of variables which will affect the issue. Mt. Washington in NH is set up similar to what SOF describes. A high mountain in the west, a sharp V shaped valley with the Wildcat ski area (lower mountain top) just to the east. Oct 8, 1966 was the first day of modern wave exploration there. Four of us got our Diamond altitudes that day. We didn't know a whole lot about wave, and we operated from the North Conway airport 23 miles to the south. Alan MacNichol towed us 23 miles through the continuous rotor of the Moat Mountains to get to Pinkham Notch right in the middle of the valley. We were at about 4200' MSL which was ~2K' below the top of Mt Washington, and about 2K' AGL. With the L-19 in a 45 left bank, and my 1-26 going 45 right, (both with full opposite control inputs), I released because there was no other option. I was lucky. After turning right 270 degrees with full controls against, I finally came into the wind and leveled out. The vario was pegged at over 1500 fpm up, and I was spit upwards into the wave, where I cut the climb off at 24K' due to airspace limits at the time. I landed after 1.5 hours and briefed a fellow club member who had just showed up with his Ka-6. He experienced the same tow, but was in heavy sink on release. He dove for the Wildcat ridge thinking it would work. It didn't. The rotor was going down-slope there. He wound up thrown into the trees while trying to land in the ski area parking lot. Luckily, he walked away, but I had to go get the Ka-6 pieces out of the woods that afternoon. I think that wind speed and atmospheric conditions will make the size / strength / location of the rotor vary, and that will directly affect if the downwind ridge is working or not. I, for one, would not bank on it working.....IMHO.....FWIW..... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Propellors vs Rotors | Don W | Home Built | 50 | March 16th 06 06:47 AM |
relative climb performance | Soaring | 8 | September 17th 05 07:21 PM | |
An Erudite Discourse on the Relative Merits and Demerits of the Various Styles of Hangar Doors | jls | Home Built | 1 | October 1st 04 01:52 AM |
Airspeed Indication and Relative Wind | Scott Lowrey | Piloting | 24 | May 8th 04 08:20 PM |
"Dirty Tricks" and "Both Sides Do It" | Leslie Swartz | Military Aviation | 19 | March 29th 04 06:11 PM |