ZZZooommm rant latest

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...

Hi Dan
One thing about the ANN gang is that they are experts at twisting the
truth to
create a perception when the reality is something different. An example
are the
the words "sucessfully sued" used by both jaun and zoom.
Here's how it was used :

"Fact: CGS has been successfully sued by unhappy customers and is still in
the
process of defending itself against same in other venues. "

Seems to me that a customer who crashes and suffers serious long term
injuries as a result of a design problem in one of your aircraft qualifies
as an "unhappy customer."

The perception they are trying to create is that I or the company "lost"
lawsuits and am defending against others. The reality is that there were I
believe 3 lawsuits against either CGS Aviation Inc or CGS Aviation that
were
settled out of court for obvious reasons. I am in fact involved in 2 more
that
are still pending. Settling out of court is not a determination of guilt .
The
use of "sucessfully sued" could have been replaced with "settled out of
court"
but that wouldn't have created the perception that I "lostwhich is what
they
were trying to do.

$750,000 qualifies as a loss in anyone's book. And you are in fact defending
against others. Jim told the truth.

I was sucessfully sued but anyone who gets sued is "sucessfully sued" but
it
doesn't mean anything about the case.

ROFLMAO! _EXACTLY_ as I predicted, rationalizations left and right! Am I
good or what?

I don't know why they get so melodramatic about this ,as if I have
something to
hide and I don't.

Because you implied you weren't, and you lied, again, just as you lied about
who started hurling insults at me with no provocation. Remember?

And now that I've proven that neither I nor Jim were lying about this, I'm
outta here and back to my airplane.

Go ahead Bob, you can regurgitate all the crap you normally put out on
subjects like this. plonk!

Juan