If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
Don,
This discussion is mainly by and for US pilots. In the US, steering the tug is acceptable practice and is taught during training. It is not dangerous as you suggest because it's common practice. In the US, my experience regarding ground launch has typically been that most folks consider it dangerous. I find it quite enjoyable and cost effective compared to air tow. I understand that, in Australia, it is MANDATORY to fly in high tow position. That makes me very uncomfortable when I'm flying the tug. In Britain, they do a lot of cloud flying. You've already read in recent threads that US pilots (me excluded) think that's crazy and dangerous. So I ask you: What's dangerous? Is it what you think is dangerous based upon your experience and under common practices where you fly, or is it what is out of the ordinary for the region in question? I think the latter choice is more appropriate. On 4/30/2015 7:28 AM, Don Johnstone wrote: At 13:13 30 April 2015, Bob Pasker wrote: ok, go back and read my origina message. the tow pilot that towed me said h= e ignored my signals because glider pilots don't know how to fly on tow, no= t because he was taking me to an area of lift, which I admit would have bee= n a great answer if he had (not you) had made it. OK let us look at this sensibly. For a glider pilot on tow to move his glider in an attempt to steer the tug is just plain crazy, only a complete idiot would attempt it. In over 50 years of gliding this is the first time I have ever heard anyone suggest the procedure. The duty of a glider pilot is to remain, as far as possible, in the correct position behind the tug. The glider goes where the tug takes him and if you have no radio contact there is NO safe way of telling him where you want to go. An out of position glider is putting the combination at risk. While it is acceptable to demonstrate out of position, for training purposes, it is essential that the tug pilot is briefed, and agrees before hand. If you got any more crazy ideas please keep them to yourself. Someone with limited knowledge might just read your crazy idea and try it out. -- Dan Marotta |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
Ouch! They've got the signals for steering the tug backwards in that image!
On 4/30/2015 8:33 AM, Bob Pasker wrote: might I draw your attention to this diagram in the FAA's Glider Flying Handbook of aerotow visual signals? http://funkyimg.com/i/WrPp.png as well as to Task C, number 5 of the Commercial Glider PTS (which refers to the above manual): C. TASK: AEROTOW - MAINTAINING TOW POSITIONS REFERENCE: FAA-H-8083-13. Objective. To determine that the applicant: 5. Uses aerotow visual signals as appropriate and as directed by the examiner. On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:30:05 AM UTC-4, Don Johnstone wrote: At 13:13 30 April 2015, Bob Pasker wrote: ok, go back and read my origina message. the tow pilot that towed me said h= e ignored my signals because glider pilots don't know how to fly on tow, no= t because he was taking me to an area of lift, which I admit would have bee= n a great answer if he had (not you) had made it. OK let us look at this sensibly. For a glider pilot on tow to move his glider in an attempt to steer the tug is just plain crazy, only a complete idiot would attempt it. In over 50 years of gliding this is the first time I have ever heard anyone suggest the procedure. The duty of a glider pilot is to remain, as far as possible, in the correct position behind the tug. The glider goes where the tug takes him and if you have no radio contact there is NO safe way of telling him where you want to go. An out of position glider is putting the combination at risk. While it is acceptable to demonstrate out of position, for training purposes, it is essential that the tug pilot is briefed, and agrees before hand. If you got any more crazy ideas please keep them to yourself. Someone with limited knowledge might just read your crazy idea and try it out. -- Dan Marotta |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
If I understand the difference in idiom, the British term "flick roll"
is equivalent to the US term "snap roll". If that's correct, stalling the vertical fin will not cause a snap roll which is a spin in the horizontal plane. And, as we all know, a spin requires a stall with yaw. In the case of a snap roll, it is an accelerated stall and I don't see any change in AoA of the wing to cause that stall. But then I'm just a poor victim if US military flight training... Or I could be wrong on the term "flick roll". Or the BGA manual could be (horrors) wrong! On 4/30/2015 8:33 AM, son_of_flubber wrote: On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 10:16:16 AM UTC-4, wrote: There is nothing fundamentally dangerous about the technique when properly done. The BGA reference (page 30) says that pulling the tug laterally has the potential to abruptly stall the vertical stabilizer of the tug, inducing a flick roll of the tug and a possible midair collision. It goes on to say "The highest risk of a lateral upset is during the 'glider cannot release' signal demonstration". See Section 42 of the BGA Aerotowing Guidance Notes (LATERAL TUG UPSETS): https://www.gliding.co.uk/bgainfo/cl.../documents/aer otownotes.pdf -- Dan Marotta |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
so they do!
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:17:58 AM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote: Ouch!* They've got the signals for steering the tug backwards in that image! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
Geez Don, demonstrating ignorance of standard tow signals while calling everyone who use them idiots? Not smart.
Ramy |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 10:49:12 AM UTC-4, Tango Whisky wrote:
Le jeudi 30 avril 2015 16:33:36 UTC+2, Bob Pasker a écrit*: might I draw your attention to this diagram in the FAA's Glider Flying Handbook of aerotow visual signals? http://funkyimg.com/i/WrPp.png When I compare the signals on tow in your link to the signals on tow in the link of son_of_flubber (which indicates just the opposite), I think that the invention of the radio was a rather good thing. This http://www.soaringsafety.org/briefings/signals.html follows the dictum "Pull the tug's tail and point him in the direction that you want to go." |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
"Only a complete idiot would attempt steering turns"
I am really biting my tongue to now respond with an equally poor rant. Steering turns were part of my initial glider training at Minden and have been part of my biannual flight reviews on and off for over twenty years at several different soaring sites. I just completed a flight review at Williams Soaring Center and steering turns were part of the review. I actually was directed to make the tow plane make a 180 degree turn using steering turns. No wonder persons of authority that have to deal with the public tend to drink heavily after a day of work. People are sooooo special. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
Eek! Too true! Well, at least they fixed the "wench launch"
chapter... |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 10:22:16 AM UTC-5, Dan Marotta wrote:
If I understand the difference in idiom, the British term "flick roll" is equivalent to the US term "snap roll".* If that's correct, stalling the vertical fin will not cause a snap roll which is a spin in the horizontal plane.* And, as we all know, a spin requires a stall with yaw.* In the case of a snap roll, it is an accelerated stall and I don't see any change in AoA of the wing to cause that stall.* But then I'm just a poor victim if US military flight training...* Or I could be wrong on the term "flick roll".* Or the BGA manual could be (horrors) wrong! Dan, I remember reading the BGA article and I think they were referring to what the towplane did when the vertical stabilizer stalled (due to the yaw from a glider WAY out to the side). The sudden loss of all yaw stability results in the tug suddenly yawing away from the glider, and the roll due to the sudden yaw results in a pretty impressive roll. Perhaps not a classic "snap roll" but interesting nevertheless! So many interesting things going on in this thread! For the original poster: Bob, it sounds like you have a tow pilot who needs some "counseling" on his responsibility as a tuggie. If it's a commercial operation, talk to the chief towpilot or the owner, and worse case take you business somewhere else. In a club situation, that tow pilot should be retrained, and if he continues to ignore the standards, asked to leave (it doesn't sound like he's a glider pilot). For Dave Springford and Don Johnstone (assuming you fly in Britain), are you saying that steering turns are not done there? What if the towplane is taking you downwind over unlandable terrain, and your radio doesn't work? You would just sit there? As far as steering turns being dangerous - how so? Unless you are deliberately holding off the yaw due to the glider moving off to the side (as in boxing the wake, which should be prebriefed prior to the launch), a smart tow pilot will just let the glider gently pull him in the direction he wants to go. And you have to move out pretty far before you significantly change the flightpath of the towplane. So, a competent glider pilot will stay behind the towplane, a competent tuggie will be clearing the flight path, and working as a team, they will proceed the the optimum release point, using whatever works best (radio or signals). Where a radio is really nice is the rare situation where the glider is trying to force the tug to go somewhere he really doesn't want (like a cloud, or other traffic). Without a radio, you pretty much are stuck with standing on the rudder and the glider should realize that you are intentionally refusing to turn. But the glider should never go so far out to the side that he risks stalling the tug tail (which is really far out!). So, nothing crazy at all about it.. By the way - the military uses visual signals all the time in high speed jets, despite all sorts of fancy radios. Why talk when you can do it silently.... Finally, Dan, I know that guy! He's the glider pilot who gets pulled through a boomer multiple times, underneath a climbing gaggle, and refuses to get off until 3000'agl, which is of course when you are in the sink from that boomer! Those glider guys, they are such a hoot! Kirk 66 (Flies on both ends of the string) |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Towpilots ignoring turn signals
With their permission I will gladly give you the contact details of at
least 2 tow pilots who have experienced just such a thing (unless it was their imagination of course...) GG At 14:55 30 April 2015, Tango Eight wrote: SNIPIt's perfectly possible for a glider to transmit steering information to a = tow plane through positioning, without causing any sort of divergent situat= ion. There is no significant danger of flick rolls (at least with a 200' r= ope and any tow plane in my experience), that's just someone's imagination = running wild. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
illegal signals knocking out gps | macpacheco | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 22nd 11 02:04 AM |
Winch Signals | Nyal Williams[_2_] | Soaring | 88 | April 20th 09 01:00 PM |
Why are people ignoring the ADS-B Out NPRM? | Ron Lee[_2_] | Piloting | 30 | December 20th 07 01:15 PM |
Tow Signals | Ramy | Soaring | 58 | October 19th 06 04:46 AM |
Ignoring the Challenger? | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | July 1st 03 10:24 AM |