A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Aerobatics
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Piper Tomahawk -- Worth Dying In?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 17th 14, 11:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.aerobatics
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Piper Tomahawk -- Worth Dying In?

On Sunday, June 8, 1997 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, wrote:
In article , (Diablo Cat) writes:
On 6 Jun 1997 02:57:57 GMT,
(Peter Ashwood-Smith) wrote:

Folks can critisize those little "Spam Can 150's" all you like but
I'll bet they will be flying for another 20 years, long after all the
fiberglass planes are history.

A lot of people don't like the traumahawk, something about the spin
characteristics. Not because it's fiberglass.

Aviation Safety did a couple of articles on it. It seems that the
original drawings called for 13 ribs in the wing, but the production
version had just four -- if memory serves me correctly.


Where do these rumors come from!! The Tomahawk is an all metal airplane, not fiberglass. The number of ribs in the wings has been consistent from day one. The plane is fully certified for spins under FAR Part 23, which is much tougher certification than the C150/C152's CAR Part 3 certification. According to the AOPA Air Safety Foundation, there has NEVER been an in-flight structural failer in a Tomahawk in the airplane's history.

The Tomahawk has a large cabin which is much more comfortable than anything Cessna has ever built. (There's nothing wrong with the Cessna trainers, but for us guys over 6' tall they are not comfy!) The Tomahawk out performs the C152 in cruise, though it does take a bit more runway during takeoff and landing due largely to the T-Tail. The wing washout in early examples was not set right, which caused abrupt stalling, but that was fixed 30 years ago with stall strips and later production changes. Other than those first few 1978 planes, they stall gently and predictably, and recover from spins conventionally.

Anyone who's actually flown a Tomahawk loves the plane. I've owned mine for 10 years now, and it's been stable and reliable and cheap to operate. You can tell how reliable they are by trying to buy one with low hours! They're all well flown with many thousands of hours on the clock. Piper stopped making these planes in the mid 1980s because the market disappeared - the same reason Cessna stopped making their piston planes at the time - not because of any problem with the airplane itself.
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Piper Tomahawk pilot realtor in Florida Owning 3 November 26th 07 07:12 AM
Piper tomahawk for 20 000$ cdn Patrik Aviation Marketplace 0 May 24th 07 02:34 AM
piper tomahawk for sale Patrik Home Built 0 May 21st 07 12:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.